Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain

Evangelia Tsolaki, Wenxin Wei, Michael Ward, Ausaf Bari, Nader Pouratian
{"title":"Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain","authors":"Evangelia Tsolaki, Wenxin Wei, Michael Ward, Ausaf Bari, Nader Pouratian","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.17.24313765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nChronic low back pain (CLBP) poses a significant challenge, contributing significantly to the ongoing opioid crisis while also being a leading cause of disability. Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) stands as the primary FDA-endorsed method for neuromodulatory therapy in CLBP, there remains a subset of patients unresponsive to SCS and others who experience insufficient pain relief over time. In view of the evidence suggesting the critical role of subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC) connectivity in pain processing, in the current study we investigated the role of the baseline SCC structural as a potential neuroimaging predictive biomarker to identify patients that are likely to benefit from SCS. Methods\nDiffusion magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired in 8 patients with CLBP (mean (SD) age = 70 (10) years; 6 female/2 male, 6 UCLA site, 2 UTSW) before their initial SCS trial. Probabilistic tractography from subject-specific anatomically defined SCC seed regions to the ventral striatum (VS), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), uncinate fasciculus (UCF) and bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was used to calculate FSL structural probabilistic connectivity in the target network. To explore cross-sectional variations in SCC connectivity related to SCS trial response, we employed a general linear model (GLM) using the SCC probability of connectivity as dependent variable, and the response to the SCS trial as independent variable. We used Pearson correlation to evaluate further the relationships between the critical SCC probability of connectivity and the change in VAS score after the SCS trial. Finally, the role of depression in the treatment outcome was evaluated. Results\nResponders to SCS had significantly lower ipsilateral SCC connectivity to mPFC (F1,8 =8.19, p = 0.03) and VS (F1,8 =17.48, p=0.01) on the left hemisphere compared to non-responders. Pearson correlation analysis showed that decreased ipsilateral SCC baseline connectivity to left mPFC (p=0.03) and VS (p=0.01) was correlated with higher improvement in VAS scores. The baseline depression severity did not significantly influence the change in VAS score following the SCS trial. On the other hand, baseline SCC-VS connectivity on the left hemisphere was a significant predictor of change in VAS score (p=0.02). Conclusions\nOur study highlights the important role of SCC connectivity that can serve as a potential biomarker for CLBP stratification and prediction to SCS treatment. These results can reshape our perspective on CLBP management and can serve as early indicator of response to the treatment providing a personalized approach based on the individual's underlying SCC connectivity.","PeriodicalId":501393,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.17.24313765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Chronic low back pain (CLBP) poses a significant challenge, contributing significantly to the ongoing opioid crisis while also being a leading cause of disability. Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) stands as the primary FDA-endorsed method for neuromodulatory therapy in CLBP, there remains a subset of patients unresponsive to SCS and others who experience insufficient pain relief over time. In view of the evidence suggesting the critical role of subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC) connectivity in pain processing, in the current study we investigated the role of the baseline SCC structural as a potential neuroimaging predictive biomarker to identify patients that are likely to benefit from SCS. Methods Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired in 8 patients with CLBP (mean (SD) age = 70 (10) years; 6 female/2 male, 6 UCLA site, 2 UTSW) before their initial SCS trial. Probabilistic tractography from subject-specific anatomically defined SCC seed regions to the ventral striatum (VS), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), uncinate fasciculus (UCF) and bilateral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was used to calculate FSL structural probabilistic connectivity in the target network. To explore cross-sectional variations in SCC connectivity related to SCS trial response, we employed a general linear model (GLM) using the SCC probability of connectivity as dependent variable, and the response to the SCS trial as independent variable. We used Pearson correlation to evaluate further the relationships between the critical SCC probability of connectivity and the change in VAS score after the SCS trial. Finally, the role of depression in the treatment outcome was evaluated. Results Responders to SCS had significantly lower ipsilateral SCC connectivity to mPFC (F1,8 =8.19, p = 0.03) and VS (F1,8 =17.48, p=0.01) on the left hemisphere compared to non-responders. Pearson correlation analysis showed that decreased ipsilateral SCC baseline connectivity to left mPFC (p=0.03) and VS (p=0.01) was correlated with higher improvement in VAS scores. The baseline depression severity did not significantly influence the change in VAS score following the SCS trial. On the other hand, baseline SCC-VS connectivity on the left hemisphere was a significant predictor of change in VAS score (p=0.02). Conclusions Our study highlights the important role of SCC connectivity that can serve as a potential biomarker for CLBP stratification and prediction to SCS treatment. These results can reshape our perspective on CLBP management and can serve as early indicator of response to the treatment providing a personalized approach based on the individual's underlying SCC connectivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为慢性腰背痛生物标志物的丘脑扣带下结构连通性
背景 慢性腰背痛(CLBP)是一项重大挑战,它在很大程度上加剧了当前的阿片类药物危机,同时也是导致残疾的主要原因。虽然脊髓刺激(SCS)是美国食品与药物管理局(FDA)认可的治疗慢性腰背痛的主要神经调节方法,但仍有一部分患者对 SCS 无反应,还有一些患者的疼痛长期得不到充分缓解。鉴于有证据表明扣带下皮层(SCC)连通性在疼痛处理中起着关键作用,我们在本研究中探讨了基线扣带下皮层结构作为潜在神经影像预测生物标志物的作用,以确定可能从 SCS 中获益的患者。方法 在首次 SCS 试验之前,我们对 8 名 CLBP 患者(平均(标清)年龄 = 70(10)岁;6 名女性/2 名男性,6 名来自加州大学洛杉矶分校,2 名来自UTSW)进行了扩散磁共振成像扫描。从特定受试者解剖学定义的 SCC 种子区域到腹侧纹状体 (VS)、前扣带回皮质 (ACC)、钩状束 (UCF) 和双侧内侧前额叶皮质 (mPFC) 的概率牵引图用于计算目标网络中的 FSL 结构概率连接。为了探索与 SCS 试验反应相关的 SCC 连接性的横截面变化,我们采用了一般线性模型 (GLM),将 SCC 连接性概率作为因变量,SCS 试验反应作为自变量。我们使用皮尔逊相关性进一步评估了临界 SCC 连接概率与 SCS 试验后 VAS 评分变化之间的关系。最后,我们还评估了抑郁症在治疗结果中的作用。结果与无应答者相比,SCS应答者左半球同侧SCC与mPFC(F1,8 =8.19,P =0.03)和VS(F1,8 =17.48,P =0.01)的连通性明显降低。皮尔逊相关分析表明,同侧 SCC 与左侧 mPFC(p=0.03)和 VS(p=0.01)的基线连通性降低与 VAS 评分的改善相关。基线抑郁严重程度对 SCS 试验后 VAS 评分的变化没有显著影响。另一方面,左半球基线 SCC-VS 连接是 VAS 评分变化的重要预测因素(p=0.02)。结论我们的研究强调了 SCC 连接性的重要作用,它可以作为潜在的生物标志物,用于 CLBP 分层和 SCS 治疗预测。这些结果可以重塑我们对慢性阻塞性脑脊髓膜炎治疗的看法,并可作为治疗反应的早期指标,根据个体潜在的 SCC 连接性提供个性化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Subcallosal Cingulate structural connectivity as a biomarker for chronic low back pain Women with fibromyalgia: Insights into behavioral and brain imaging Towards validation of clinical measures to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain: cluster analysis of a cohort with chronic musculoskeletal pain Pain-related white-matter changes following mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging pilot study Mitigating the Opioid Epidemic: The Role of Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1