Evaluation of evaporation methods for modelling rainfall interception in a dry tropical forest

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Theoretical and Applied Climatology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s00704-024-05096-1
Antonio José Steidle Neto, Daniela C. Lopes, Thieres G. F. Silva, Luciana S. B. Souza
{"title":"Evaluation of evaporation methods for modelling rainfall interception in a dry tropical forest","authors":"Antonio José Steidle Neto, Daniela C. Lopes, Thieres G. F. Silva, Luciana S. B. Souza","doi":"10.1007/s00704-024-05096-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The simulation of rainfall interception by vegetation is essential to water resource management, considering both changing land use and climate change effects. In the rainfall interception models, the evaporation rate is frequently estimated by means of the Penman-Monteith method, but the Priestley-Taylor equation appears as a promising approach with fewer input requirements. In this study these both formulations were evaluated with the sparse Gash model with variable parametrization for estimating rainfall interception by four tree species in a Brazilian dry tropical forest. The Penman-Monteith equation was used with the canopy resistance set to zero, and the momentum method was applied for estimating the aerodynamic resistance. The Priestley-Taylor formulation was tested with the proportional coefficients (α) of 1.26 and 1.34. The results of rainfall predictions were compared with the measurements by statistical indicators, which pointed slightly favorable to Penman-Monteith method. The Priestley-Taylor with α = 1.26 resulted in predictions better than with α = 1.34. Most of the simulations were classified as good (CMRE varying from 5.5 − 9.3%). The Priestley-Taylor method can be used for estimating the evaporation rate in simulations based on the sparse Gash model with variable parametrization in the studied dry tropical forest, under situations with restrictions of micrometeorological measurements or minimal processing time requirement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22945,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-024-05096-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The simulation of rainfall interception by vegetation is essential to water resource management, considering both changing land use and climate change effects. In the rainfall interception models, the evaporation rate is frequently estimated by means of the Penman-Monteith method, but the Priestley-Taylor equation appears as a promising approach with fewer input requirements. In this study these both formulations were evaluated with the sparse Gash model with variable parametrization for estimating rainfall interception by four tree species in a Brazilian dry tropical forest. The Penman-Monteith equation was used with the canopy resistance set to zero, and the momentum method was applied for estimating the aerodynamic resistance. The Priestley-Taylor formulation was tested with the proportional coefficients (α) of 1.26 and 1.34. The results of rainfall predictions were compared with the measurements by statistical indicators, which pointed slightly favorable to Penman-Monteith method. The Priestley-Taylor with α = 1.26 resulted in predictions better than with α = 1.34. Most of the simulations were classified as good (CMRE varying from 5.5 − 9.3%). The Priestley-Taylor method can be used for estimating the evaporation rate in simulations based on the sparse Gash model with variable parametrization in the studied dry tropical forest, under situations with restrictions of micrometeorological measurements or minimal processing time requirement.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于模拟热带干旱森林降雨截流的蒸发方法
考虑到土地利用的变化和气候变化的影响,模拟植被对降雨的拦截对水资源管理至关重要。在降雨截流模型中,蒸发率通常是通过彭曼-蒙蒂斯法估算的,但普利斯特里-泰勒方程似乎是一种有前途的方法,对输入的要求较少。在这项研究中,利用参数可变的稀疏加什模型对这两种公式进行了评估,以估算巴西干旱热带雨林中四种树种的降雨截流情况。在将树冠阻力设为零的情况下使用了彭曼-蒙蒂斯方程,并采用动量法估算了空气动力阻力。普里斯特利-泰勒公式在比例系数(α)为 1.26 和 1.34 时进行了测试。通过统计指标将降雨预测结果与测量结果进行比较,结果表明 Penman-Monteith 方法略胜一筹。普里斯特利-泰勒法(α = 1.26)的预测结果优于α = 1.34。大多数模拟结果被归类为良好(CMRE 在 5.5 - 9.3% 之间)。在所研究的干旱热带雨林中,普利斯特里-泰勒方法可用于估算基于稀疏加什模型的可变参数化模拟中的蒸发率,前提是微气象测量数据有限或处理时间要求最短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Theoretical and Applied Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
376
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Climatology covers the following topics: - climate modeling, climatic changes and climate forecasting, micro- to mesoclimate, applied meteorology as in agro- and forestmeteorology, biometeorology, building meteorology and atmospheric radiation problems as they relate to the biosphere - effects of anthropogenic and natural aerosols or gaseous trace constituents - hardware and software elements of meteorological measurements, including techniques of remote sensing
期刊最新文献
Climatological analysis of rainfall over Hinatuan City, Surigao del Sur in eastern Mindanao—the wettest location in the Philippines Evaluating NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 performance in complex terrain for forecasting key freezing rain factors High-resolution projections of future FWI conditions for Portugal according to CMIP6 future climate scenarios On the variability of convective available potential energy in the Mediterranean Region for the 83-year period 1940–2022; signals of climate emergency Wavelet local multiple correlation analysis of long-term AOD, LST, and NDVI time-series over different climatic zones of India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1