The search suggestion effect (SSE): A quantification of how autocomplete search suggestions could be used to impact opinions and votes

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108342
Robert Epstein, Savannah Aries, Kelly Grebbien, Alyssa M. Salcedo, Vanessa R. Zankich
{"title":"The search suggestion effect (SSE): A quantification of how autocomplete search suggestions could be used to impact opinions and votes","authors":"Robert Epstein,&nbsp;Savannah Aries,&nbsp;Kelly Grebbien,&nbsp;Alyssa M. Salcedo,&nbsp;Vanessa R. Zankich","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>News reports in 2016 suggested that a leading search engine was suppressing negative search suggestions for one US Presidential candidate but not for her opponent. We conducted a progressive series of five experiments to determine what effect differential suppression of this type might have on voters. We found that negative suggestions attract far more clicks than neutral or positive ones, consistent with extensive research on negativity bias, and that the differential suppression of negative search suggestions can turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into more than a 90/10 split favoring the candidate for whom negative search suggestions were suppressed. We conclude that differentially suppressing negative search suggestions can have a dramatic impact on the opinions and voting preferences of undecided voters, potentially shifting a large number of votes without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002103/pdfft?md5=542bfc9ec3db1ec0b448486029533245&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224002103-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

News reports in 2016 suggested that a leading search engine was suppressing negative search suggestions for one US Presidential candidate but not for her opponent. We conducted a progressive series of five experiments to determine what effect differential suppression of this type might have on voters. We found that negative suggestions attract far more clicks than neutral or positive ones, consistent with extensive research on negativity bias, and that the differential suppression of negative search suggestions can turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into more than a 90/10 split favoring the candidate for whom negative search suggestions were suppressed. We conclude that differentially suppressing negative search suggestions can have a dramatic impact on the opinions and voting preferences of undecided voters, potentially shifting a large number of votes without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
搜索建议效应(SSE):量化自动完成搜索建议对意见和投票的影响
2016 年的新闻报道显示,一家领先的搜索引擎压制了对一位美国总统候选人的负面搜索建议,但却没有压制对其对手的负面搜索建议。我们进行了五个渐进式系列实验,以确定这种类型的差异化压制可能会对选民产生什么影响。我们发现,负面建议所吸引的点击量远高于中性或正面建议,这与关于负面偏差的广泛研究相一致,而且对负面搜索建议的不同抑制可以将未决定选民中的五五分成转化为 90/10 以上的有利于被抑制负面搜索建议的候选人。我们的结论是,有区别地压制负面搜索建议会对未决定选民的意见和投票偏好产生巨大影响,有可能在人们不知情的情况下转移大量选票,而且不会留下纸质线索供当局追踪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
The negative consequences of networking through social network services: A social comparison perspective Can online behaviors be linked to mental health? Active versus passive social network usage on depression via envy and self-esteem Self-regulation deficiencies and perceived problematic online pornography use among young Chinese women: The role of self-acceptance Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing Navigating online perils: Socioeconomic status, online activity lifestyles, and online fraud targeting and victimization of old adults in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1