Global Lunar Crater Density Using Buffered Nonsparseness Correction

IF 3.8 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS The Planetary Science Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.3847/psj/ad4ceb
Ya Huei Huang, Christian Riedel, Jason M. Soderblom, Stephanie Brown Krein, Csilla Orgel, Jack W. Conrad, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, David A. Minton
{"title":"Global Lunar Crater Density Using Buffered Nonsparseness Correction","authors":"Ya Huei Huang, Christian Riedel, Jason M. Soderblom, Stephanie Brown Krein, Csilla Orgel, Jack W. Conrad, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, David A. Minton","doi":"10.3847/psj/ad4ceb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The density of craters on a planetary surface directly relates to the age of the surface. As the surface ages, however, craters can be erased by subsequent large impacts via direct overprinting, known as geometric crater obliteration. Such counts become increasingly limited as surfaces become more heavily cratered. Techniques to infer the statistics of the regions obliterated by craters were developed in the past decade. Such techniques, however, have only been used for regional studies. Herein, we present a study of the global density of lunar impact craters ≥20 km in diameter using both traditional crater-counting and buffered nonsparseness correction (BNSC) crater-counting techniques. By comparing the measurements, we quantify the influence of geometric crater obliteration on the visible lunar crater record. Our results reveal that geometric crater obliteration erased up to three-fifths of craters ≥20 km in diameter that formed on the most ancient lunar terrains, whereas younger surfaces, like the Procellarum KREEP Terrane, show little to no evidence of such crater obliteration. The differences in derived crater densities highlight ancient surfaces in which the effects of geometric crater obliteration must be considered to characterize their cratering histories. Furthermore, our results identify the most heavily cratered area on the Moon, a region of the lunar highlands between Smythii basin and the South Pole–Aitken (SPA) basin (Smythii–SPA–Highlands); the number of impacts revealed by the BNSC technique for this region is consistent with estimates derived from the abundance of highly siderophile elements and from modeling crustal porosity.","PeriodicalId":34524,"journal":{"name":"The Planetary Science Journal","volume":"367 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planetary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad4ceb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The density of craters on a planetary surface directly relates to the age of the surface. As the surface ages, however, craters can be erased by subsequent large impacts via direct overprinting, known as geometric crater obliteration. Such counts become increasingly limited as surfaces become more heavily cratered. Techniques to infer the statistics of the regions obliterated by craters were developed in the past decade. Such techniques, however, have only been used for regional studies. Herein, we present a study of the global density of lunar impact craters ≥20 km in diameter using both traditional crater-counting and buffered nonsparseness correction (BNSC) crater-counting techniques. By comparing the measurements, we quantify the influence of geometric crater obliteration on the visible lunar crater record. Our results reveal that geometric crater obliteration erased up to three-fifths of craters ≥20 km in diameter that formed on the most ancient lunar terrains, whereas younger surfaces, like the Procellarum KREEP Terrane, show little to no evidence of such crater obliteration. The differences in derived crater densities highlight ancient surfaces in which the effects of geometric crater obliteration must be considered to characterize their cratering histories. Furthermore, our results identify the most heavily cratered area on the Moon, a region of the lunar highlands between Smythii basin and the South Pole–Aitken (SPA) basin (Smythii–SPA–Highlands); the number of impacts revealed by the BNSC technique for this region is consistent with estimates derived from the abundance of highly siderophile elements and from modeling crustal porosity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用缓冲非稀疏性校正的全球月球陨石坑密度
行星表面的陨石坑密度与行星表面的年龄直接相关。然而,随着表面年龄的增长,陨石坑可能会被随后的大型撞击通过直接叠印的方式抹去,这就是所谓的几何陨石坑抹去。随着地表陨石坑越来越多,这种计数也越来越有限。在过去的十年中,开发出了推断陨石坑湮没区域统计数据的技术。然而,这些技术只用于区域研究。在此,我们利用传统的环形山计数技术和缓冲非稀疏性校正(BNSC)环形山计数技术,对直径≥20 千米的月球撞击环形山的全球密度进行了研究。通过比较测量结果,我们量化了几何陨石坑湮没对可见月球陨石坑记录的影响。我们的结果表明,在最古老的月球地形上形成的直径≥20千米的环形山中,多达五分之三的环形山被几何湮没所抹去,而较年轻的地表,如Procellarum KREEP Terrane,则几乎没有这种环形山湮没的迹象。得出的陨石坑密度差异突出表明,在一些古老的表面上,必须考虑几何陨石坑湮没的影响,以确定其陨石坑历史的特征。此外,我们的研究结果还确定了月球上陨石坑最密集的区域,即位于斯迈思盆地和南极-艾特肯盆地(斯迈思-南极-艾特肯盆地-高地)之间的月球高地区域;BNSC技术所揭示的这一区域的撞击次数与根据高亲铁元素丰度和地壳孔隙率建模得出的估计值相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Planetary Science Journal
The Planetary Science Journal Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jovian Vortex Hunter: A Citizen Science Project to Study Jupiter’s Vortices Experimental Method for Measuring Cohesion of Regolith via Electrostatic Lofting Mid-infrared Measurements of Ion-irradiated Carbonaceous Meteorites: How to Better Detect Space Weathering Effects Triton’s Captured Youth: Tidal Heating Kept Triton Warm and Active for Billions of Years The Global Distribution of Water and Hydroxyl on the Moon as Seen by the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1