Greedy Jobs, Labour Market Institutions, and the Gender Pay Gap*

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Record Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/1475-4932.12824
Kristen Sobeck
{"title":"Greedy Jobs, Labour Market Institutions, and the Gender Pay Gap*","authors":"Kristen Sobeck","doi":"10.1111/1475-4932.12824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research argues that occupational gender pay gaps arise from greedy jobs within occupations. Greedy jobs involve working long and unpredictable hours in jobs where individuals are not easily substitutable. They engender compensating differentials resulting in an earnings‐to‐hours elasticity that often exceeds 1. This paper shows that greedy jobs also exist in Australia, where labour market institutions differ substantially from those in the United States. It shows that occupational gender earnings gaps are highest in occupations where greedy jobs proliferate. Wage‐setting institutions engender heterogeneous effects on occupational gender earnings gaps. Relative to the United States, occupational gender earnings gaps are smaller in Australia, consistent with evidence that labour market institutions compress the earnings distribution. Within occupations, the use of collective agreements attenuates the size of occupational gender earnings gaps, while the use of individual agreements increases them. Not surprisingly, individuals employed in greedy occupations predominantly use individual agreements to negotiate pay.","PeriodicalId":47484,"journal":{"name":"Economic Record","volume":"368 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Record","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research argues that occupational gender pay gaps arise from greedy jobs within occupations. Greedy jobs involve working long and unpredictable hours in jobs where individuals are not easily substitutable. They engender compensating differentials resulting in an earnings‐to‐hours elasticity that often exceeds 1. This paper shows that greedy jobs also exist in Australia, where labour market institutions differ substantially from those in the United States. It shows that occupational gender earnings gaps are highest in occupations where greedy jobs proliferate. Wage‐setting institutions engender heterogeneous effects on occupational gender earnings gaps. Relative to the United States, occupational gender earnings gaps are smaller in Australia, consistent with evidence that labour market institutions compress the earnings distribution. Within occupations, the use of collective agreements attenuates the size of occupational gender earnings gaps, while the use of individual agreements increases them. Not surprisingly, individuals employed in greedy occupations predominantly use individual agreements to negotiate pay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贪婪的工作、劳动力市场体制和性别薪酬差距*
以往的研究认为,职业性别薪酬差距源于职业内部的贪婪工作。贪婪的工作是指在个人不易被替代的工作岗位上,工作时间长且不可预测。这些工作会产生补偿性差异,导致收入与工时之间的弹性往往超过 1。本文表明,澳大利亚也存在贪婪工作,澳大利亚的劳动力市场制度与美国有很大不同。它表明,在贪婪工作大量存在的职业中,男女收入差距最大。工资设定制度对职业性别收入差距产生了不同的影响。与美国相比,澳大利亚的职业性别收入差距较小,这与劳动力市场制度压缩收入分配的证据相一致。在各种职业中,集体协议的使用会缩小职业性别收入差距,而个人协议的使用则会扩大这种差距。不足为奇的是,受雇于贪婪职业的个人主要使用个人协议来协商薪酬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Record
Economic Record ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Economic Society of Australia, the Economic Record is intended to act as a vehicle for the communication of advances in knowledge and understanding in economics. It publishes papers in the theoretical, applied and policy areas of economics and provides a forum for research on the Australian economy. It also publishes surveys in economics and book reviews to facilitate the dissemination of knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information News and Notices Lost in Transition: A Cohort Analysis of Catch‐Up in Homeownership in Australia* A Review of Wellbeing: Science and Policy, by Richard Layard, and Jan‐Emmanuel De Neve (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 2023), pp. 350. An Incentive Program with Almost no Incentive: Overlooked Benefits of Pay for Performance*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1