Economic and Political Determinants of Sovereign Default and IMF Credit Use: A Robustness Assessment Post 2010

IF 2.1 Q2 ECONOMICS Economies Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/economies12070181
Lina Maddah, Hassan Sherry, Hussein Zeaiter
{"title":"Economic and Political Determinants of Sovereign Default and IMF Credit Use: A Robustness Assessment Post 2010","authors":"Lina Maddah, Hassan Sherry, Hussein Zeaiter","doi":"10.3390/economies12070181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the IMF, the current public debt makes up nearly 40 percent of the global debt, marking the highest share since the mid-1960s. Despite the vast research on alarming levels of sovereign default, the literature remains inconclusive. This paper investigates macroeconomic, financial, and political determinants of IMF credit use in the post-2010 era. The main contribution of our study lies in its temporal analysis as we investigate how the robustness of different factors has evolved. By utilizing an extensive dataset on 216 countries over the period of 2010–2021 and employing a variant of the Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) method, our study reveals that fluctuations in the IMF credit to external debt ratio can be attributed to changes in the total reserves to external debt ratio, where this relationship is statistically significant and reliable. However, high political risks seem to no longer affect the IMF’s decision, post 2010. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that excluding countries with low debt arrears strengthens the results’ robustness. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the complexities surrounding IMF credit use in the contemporary global economic scene and offer new standpoints on the Fund’s lending choices.","PeriodicalId":52214,"journal":{"name":"Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12070181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the IMF, the current public debt makes up nearly 40 percent of the global debt, marking the highest share since the mid-1960s. Despite the vast research on alarming levels of sovereign default, the literature remains inconclusive. This paper investigates macroeconomic, financial, and political determinants of IMF credit use in the post-2010 era. The main contribution of our study lies in its temporal analysis as we investigate how the robustness of different factors has evolved. By utilizing an extensive dataset on 216 countries over the period of 2010–2021 and employing a variant of the Extreme Bounds Analysis (EBA) method, our study reveals that fluctuations in the IMF credit to external debt ratio can be attributed to changes in the total reserves to external debt ratio, where this relationship is statistically significant and reliable. However, high political risks seem to no longer affect the IMF’s decision, post 2010. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that excluding countries with low debt arrears strengthens the results’ robustness. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the complexities surrounding IMF credit use in the contemporary global economic scene and offer new standpoints on the Fund’s lending choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主权违约和国际货币基金组织信贷使用的经济和政治决定因素:2010 年后的稳健性评估
根据国际货币基金组织的数据,目前的公共债务占全球债务的近 40%,是自 20 世纪 60 年代中期以来的最高份额。尽管对令人担忧的主权违约问题进行了大量研究,但相关文献仍然没有定论。本文研究了 2010 年后国际货币基金组织信贷使用的宏观经济、金融和政治决定因素。我们研究的主要贡献在于其时间分析,因为我们调查了不同因素的稳健性是如何演变的。通过利用 2010-2021 年期间 216 个国家的广泛数据集,并采用极端边界分析(EBA)方法的变体,我们的研究揭示了国际货币基金组织信贷与外债比率的波动可归因于总储备与外债比率的变化,这种关系在统计上是显著和可靠的。然而,2010 年后,高政治风险似乎不再影响国际货币基金组织的决策。此外,我们的研究结果表明,将债务拖欠程度低的国家排除在外可增强结果的稳健性。这些研究结果有助于更好地理解国际货币基金组织在当代全球经济环境中使用信贷的复杂性,并为国际货币基金组织的贷款选择提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economies
Economies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Drivers of Firm Internationalisation: A Fuzzy Set Analysis Using Global Entrepreneurship Development Index Data What Determines the Crime Rate? A Macroeconomic Case Study The Contribution of Green, Blue, and Energy Sources to Economic Development in Central Asia Quantifying Loss to the Economy Using Interrupted Time Series Models: An Application to the Wholesale and Retail Sales Industries in South Africa Accessibility and Older and Foreign Populations: Exploring Local Spatial Heterogeneities across Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1