Comparative landslide susceptibility assessment using information value and frequency ratio bivariate statistical methods: a case study from Northwestern Himalayas, Jammu and Kashmir, India

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-12022-2
Imran Khan, Ashutosh Kainthola, Harish Bahuguna, Md. Sarfaraz Asgher
{"title":"Comparative landslide susceptibility assessment using information value and frequency ratio bivariate statistical methods: a case study from Northwestern Himalayas, Jammu and Kashmir, India","authors":"Imran Khan, Ashutosh Kainthola, Harish Bahuguna, Md. Sarfaraz Asgher","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-12022-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the northwestern Himalayas, including Jammu and Kashmir (J&amp;K), frequent landslides pose significant risks, necessitating proactive zoning to mitigate potential damage through effective land-use planning. Fourteen causative and two triggering factors, such as slope, aspect, curvature, relative relief (RR), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), geomorphon, dissection index (Di), lithology, structural tectonic, drainage density (Dd), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), land use land cover (LULC), road density (Rd), earthquake density (Ed), and rainfall density (Rd), were selected based on terrain conditions to assess landslide susceptibility. Utilizing frequency ratio (FR) and information value (IV) approaches, a comprehensive landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) study covered 54,922 km<sup>2</sup>, incorporating 6669 landslide instances. This dataset was split into 70% (4659 landslides) for modeling and 30% (2010 landslides) for validation. The landslide susceptibility map, classified into five categories (very low, low, moderate, high, and very high), delineates varying proportions of the study area. Using the FR approach, these zones cover 12.9% (7063 km<sup>2</sup>), 25.7% (14,101 km<sup>2</sup>), 25.6% (14,049 km<sup>2</sup>), 24.7% (13,586 km<sup>2</sup>), and 11.1% (6123 km<sup>2</sup>) of the area, respectively. Meanwhile, employing the IV approach, the coverage percentages are 5.7% (3119 km<sup>2</sup>), 11.0% (6063 km<sup>2</sup>), 20.1% (11,057 km<sup>2</sup>), 38.9% (21,373 km<sup>2</sup>), and 24.1% (13,310 km<sup>2</sup>). Validation using receiver operating characteristic curves revealed high correlations for both FR (AUC: 0.809) and IV (AUC: 0.778) models, indicating their effectiveness. The FR model, characterized by simplicity and higher accuracy, outperformed the IV model, offering valuable insights for local, regional, and governments in land-use planning, disaster prevention, and mitigation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12022-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the northwestern Himalayas, including Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), frequent landslides pose significant risks, necessitating proactive zoning to mitigate potential damage through effective land-use planning. Fourteen causative and two triggering factors, such as slope, aspect, curvature, relative relief (RR), terrain ruggedness index (TRI), geomorphon, dissection index (Di), lithology, structural tectonic, drainage density (Dd), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), land use land cover (LULC), road density (Rd), earthquake density (Ed), and rainfall density (Rd), were selected based on terrain conditions to assess landslide susceptibility. Utilizing frequency ratio (FR) and information value (IV) approaches, a comprehensive landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) study covered 54,922 km2, incorporating 6669 landslide instances. This dataset was split into 70% (4659 landslides) for modeling and 30% (2010 landslides) for validation. The landslide susceptibility map, classified into five categories (very low, low, moderate, high, and very high), delineates varying proportions of the study area. Using the FR approach, these zones cover 12.9% (7063 km2), 25.7% (14,101 km2), 25.6% (14,049 km2), 24.7% (13,586 km2), and 11.1% (6123 km2) of the area, respectively. Meanwhile, employing the IV approach, the coverage percentages are 5.7% (3119 km2), 11.0% (6063 km2), 20.1% (11,057 km2), 38.9% (21,373 km2), and 24.1% (13,310 km2). Validation using receiver operating characteristic curves revealed high correlations for both FR (AUC: 0.809) and IV (AUC: 0.778) models, indicating their effectiveness. The FR model, characterized by simplicity and higher accuracy, outperformed the IV model, offering valuable insights for local, regional, and governments in land-use planning, disaster prevention, and mitigation efforts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用信息值和频率比二变量统计方法进行滑坡易发性比较评估:印度查谟和克什米尔西北喜马拉雅山案例研究
在包括查谟和克什米尔(J&K)在内的喜马拉雅山西北部,频繁发生的山体滑坡带来了巨大风险,因此有必要通过有效的土地利用规划,积极进行分区,以减轻潜在的破坏。根据地形条件,选择溪流动力指数 (SPI)、地形湿润指数 (TWI)、土地利用土地覆盖 (LULC)、道路密度 (Rd)、地震密度 (Ed) 和降雨密度 (Rd) 来评估滑坡易发性。利用频率比(FR)和信息值(IV)方法,一项全面的滑坡易发性绘图(LSM)研究覆盖了 54,922 平方公里,包含 6669 个滑坡实例。该数据集分为 70%(4659 个滑坡实例)用于建模,30%(2010 个滑坡实例)用于验证。滑坡易发性地图分为五个类别(极低、低、中、高和极高),划分了研究区域的不同比例。采用 FR 方法,这些区域的面积分别为 12.9%(7063 平方公里)、25.7%(14101 平方公里)、25.6%(14049 平方公里)、24.7%(13586 平方公里)和 11.1%(6123 平方公里)。而采用 IV 方法,覆盖率分别为 5.7%(3119 平方公里)、11.0%(6063 平方公里)、20.1%(11057 平方公里)、38.9%(21373 平方公里)和 24.1%(13310 平方公里)。利用接收器运行特征曲线进行的验证显示,FR 模型(AUC:0.809)和 IV 模型(AUC:0.778)都具有较高的相关性,表明其有效性。FR 模型的特点是简单、准确性高,其性能优于 IV 模型,为地方、区域和政府的土地利用规划、防灾和减灾工作提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Construction of multi-purpose geophysical test site on a lateritic clay soil Impact of stained- and cemented-type sandstone natural fractures on stress-weathered cracking behavior Mineralogical, geochemical, and spectral characteristics of low-high grade bauxite deposits of the southern bauxite zone at Al Ba’itha mine, Az Zabirah, Saudi Arabia Reservoir recovery study with stability analysis model constructed by water-driven oil flat sand filling experiment: example of well area X in Tankou oilfield, China Geotechnical characterisation and 2D soil cross-section model development in the Kashmir Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1