O-140 THE SITUATION VIS-À-VIS LATENT TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION OF HOSPITAL STAFF AT ENTRY AND POST-CONTACT TO ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS: A STUDY AT A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN THAILAND

Naesinee Chaiear, Phanumas Kraisorn, Chatpong Ngarmchokwatta, Kiatichai Faksri, Yingrit Chantarasuk, Arunya Phewkliang
{"title":"O-140 THE SITUATION VIS-À-VIS LATENT TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION OF HOSPITAL STAFF AT ENTRY AND POST-CONTACT TO ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS: A STUDY AT A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN THAILAND","authors":"Naesinee Chaiear, Phanumas Kraisorn, Chatpong Ngarmchokwatta, Kiatichai Faksri, Yingrit Chantarasuk, Arunya Phewkliang","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Hospital staff are at higher risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), but there is limited understanding of the real LTBI situation among the large hospital staff in Thailand. Objectives: 1) We investigated 1) the proportion of LTBI among hospital workers at entry and after they were prioritized as having had high or medium contact with active TB, and 2) the recent development of LTBI. Methodology: This was descriptive research done on 2,021 hospital staff between 2016-2020. The recent development of LTBI was studied in 416 hospital staff between 2021-2022. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus was used to determine LTBI (QFT-Plus). Results The proportion of LTBI among the hospital staff at job commencement was 8.02% (97/1210), compared to 12.5% (101/811) post-contact to active tuberculosis (TB). The 5-year prevalence of LTBI was 9.80% (198/2021). Hospital staff post-contact with TB were categorized as high priority (61.9%), and most index cases were patients (86.9%). No active cases of TB were found following post-contact with TB. 49.9% of LTBI cases were treated with preventive treatments. As for the recent development of LTBI, annual surveillance was reported at 2.4% (10/416), whereas 13.5% (5/37) were found post-contact with TB, and most cases during performance of aerosol generated procedures (AGP). Discussion In Thailand, a program for hospital staff post-contact with active TB surveillance is worth considering. Hospital staff performing AGP should be aware of appropriate respirators. Conclusion The proportion of LTBI among hospital staff in Thailand was not as high as previously reported. Post-contact to TB is worth routine implementation.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Hospital staff are at higher risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), but there is limited understanding of the real LTBI situation among the large hospital staff in Thailand. Objectives: 1) We investigated 1) the proportion of LTBI among hospital workers at entry and after they were prioritized as having had high or medium contact with active TB, and 2) the recent development of LTBI. Methodology: This was descriptive research done on 2,021 hospital staff between 2016-2020. The recent development of LTBI was studied in 416 hospital staff between 2021-2022. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus was used to determine LTBI (QFT-Plus). Results The proportion of LTBI among the hospital staff at job commencement was 8.02% (97/1210), compared to 12.5% (101/811) post-contact to active tuberculosis (TB). The 5-year prevalence of LTBI was 9.80% (198/2021). Hospital staff post-contact with TB were categorized as high priority (61.9%), and most index cases were patients (86.9%). No active cases of TB were found following post-contact with TB. 49.9% of LTBI cases were treated with preventive treatments. As for the recent development of LTBI, annual surveillance was reported at 2.4% (10/416), whereas 13.5% (5/37) were found post-contact with TB, and most cases during performance of aerosol generated procedures (AGP). Discussion In Thailand, a program for hospital staff post-contact with active TB surveillance is worth considering. Hospital staff performing AGP should be aware of appropriate respirators. Conclusion The proportion of LTBI among hospital staff in Thailand was not as high as previously reported. Post-contact to TB is worth routine implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O-140 医院工作人员入职时和接触活动性肺结核后的肺结核潜伏感染情况:泰国一家三级医院的研究
导言:医院工作人员是潜伏肺结核感染(LTBI)的高风险人群,但人们对泰国大型医院工作人员中LTBI的实际情况了解有限。研究目的1)我们调查了 1) 医院工作人员在入职时和被优先考虑为与活动性肺结核有高度或中度接触后的 LTBI 比例,以及 2) LTBI 的近期发展情况。研究方法:这是一项描述性研究,研究对象是2016-2020年间的2021名医院工作人员。在 2021-2022 年期间,对 416 名医院员工近期出现的 LTBI 进行了研究。采用QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus测定LTBI(QFT-Plus)。结果 医院员工在开始工作时患有 LTBI 的比例为 8.02%(97/1210),而在接触活动性肺结核(TB)后为 12.5%(101/811)。5年的LTBI患病率为9.80%(198/2021)。接触结核病后的医院工作人员被列为高度优先人群(61.9%),大多数指标病例为患者(86.9%)。接触肺结核患者后未发现活动性肺结核病例。49.9%的迟发性肺结核患者接受了预防性治疗。至于近期出现的迟发性肺结核,年度监测报告为 2.4%(10/416),而 13.5%(5/37)是在接触肺结核患者后发现的,大多数病例是在进行气溶胶产生程序(AGP)时发现的。讨论 在泰国,医院员工接触后活动性肺结核监测计划值得考虑。执行 AGP 的医院工作人员应了解适当的呼吸器。结论 在泰国,医院工作人员中感染迟发性肺结核的比例并不像之前报道的那么高。接触后结核病监测值得常规实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
90 years SOM then and now A better approach to mitigate the risk of airborne infections in workplaces. Bauxite mine and alumina refinery workers: mortality and cancer risk ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care. Evaluation of job satisfaction and related factors in wood extraction workers in Gilan province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1