P-526 THE IMPACT OF LONG WORKING HOURS AND THE USE OF WORK-RELATED COMMUNICATION DEVICES OUTSIDE REGULAR WORKING HOURS ON COMPUTER VISION SYNDROME AMONG WORKERS INTENSIVELY UTILIZING VISUAL DISPLAY TERMINALS

Kim Shinhyeong, Seong-Kyu Kang, Won-Jun Choi, Seunghon Ham
{"title":"P-526 THE IMPACT OF LONG WORKING HOURS AND THE USE OF WORK-RELATED COMMUNICATION DEVICES OUTSIDE REGULAR WORKING HOURS ON COMPUTER VISION SYNDROME AMONG WORKERS INTENSIVELY UTILIZING VISUAL DISPLAY TERMINALS","authors":"Kim Shinhyeong, Seong-Kyu Kang, Won-Jun Choi, Seunghon Ham","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Prior studies have explored psychological strain caused by work-related communication devices used beyond regular working hours. However, research on their direct physical impacts is limited. This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of long working hours and off-hours use of work-related communication devices on computer vision syndrome (CVS) symptoms among workers extensively using visual display terminals (VDTs). Methods This study utilized cross-sectional data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), specifically responses from 16,304 workers using VDTs over half of work time. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression models, adjusting for gender, age, occupation, education, and income to examine influence of work-related communication device use during off-hours or long working hours on CVS symptoms. Results Compared to the reference group, those using work-related communication devices off-hours without long working hours showed higher risk of CVS symptoms (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.57-1.86) compared to those who worked long hours but did not use work-related communication devices during off-hours (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.76). Furthermore, the group that both worked long hours and used work-related communication devices outside of regular working hours exhibited the highest OR of CVS symptoms (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.65-2.22). Conclusion Among VDT-intensive workers, the use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours is associated with higher risk of CVS symptoms compared to working long hours alone. This suggests that when redefining working hours, it is necessary to consider work-related communication device use outside of working hours with regular work time.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Prior studies have explored psychological strain caused by work-related communication devices used beyond regular working hours. However, research on their direct physical impacts is limited. This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of long working hours and off-hours use of work-related communication devices on computer vision syndrome (CVS) symptoms among workers extensively using visual display terminals (VDTs). Methods This study utilized cross-sectional data from the 6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS), specifically responses from 16,304 workers using VDTs over half of work time. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression models, adjusting for gender, age, occupation, education, and income to examine influence of work-related communication device use during off-hours or long working hours on CVS symptoms. Results Compared to the reference group, those using work-related communication devices off-hours without long working hours showed higher risk of CVS symptoms (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.57-1.86) compared to those who worked long hours but did not use work-related communication devices during off-hours (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.76). Furthermore, the group that both worked long hours and used work-related communication devices outside of regular working hours exhibited the highest OR of CVS symptoms (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.65-2.22). Conclusion Among VDT-intensive workers, the use of work-related communication devices outside regular working hours is associated with higher risk of CVS symptoms compared to working long hours alone. This suggests that when redefining working hours, it is necessary to consider work-related communication device use outside of working hours with regular work time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P-526 长时间工作和在正常工作时间以外使用与工作有关的通讯设备对大量使用视觉显示终端的工人的电脑视觉综合症的影响
导言 以前的研究探讨了与工作有关的通讯设备在正常工作时间以外使用所造成的心理压力。然而,对其直接身体影响的研究却很有限。本研究旨在评估和比较长时间工作和非工作时间使用工作相关通讯设备对广泛使用视觉显示终端(VDT)的工人的电脑视觉综合症(CVS)症状的影响。方法 本研究利用了第六次韩国工作条件调查(KWCS)的横截面数据,特别是 16304 名半数以上工作时间使用 VDT 的工人的回复。在调整性别、年龄、职业、教育程度和收入的基础上,利用逻辑回归模型计算出患病率比(ORs)和 95% 的置信区间(CIs),以研究在非工作时间或长时间工作时使用与工作相关的通讯设备对 CVS 症状的影响。结果 与参照组相比,在非工作时间使用与工作相关的通讯设备而没有长时间工作的人群出现 CVS 症状的风险更高(OR:1.71,95% CI:1.57-1.86),而长时间工作但没有在非工作时间使用与工作相关的通讯设备的人群出现 CVS 症状的风险更高(OR:1.36,95% CI:1.05-1.76)。此外,既长时间工作又在正常工作时间以外使用与工作相关的通讯设备的人群出现 CVS 症状的 OR 值最高(OR:1.91,95% CI:1.65-2.22)。结论 在 VDT 密集型工人中,与单独长时间工作相比,在正常工作时间之外使用与工作相关的通讯设备与更高的 CVS 症状风险相关。这表明,在重新定义工作时间时,有必要将工作时间以外使用与工作相关的通讯设备与正常工作时间结合起来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
90 years SOM then and now A better approach to mitigate the risk of airborne infections in workplaces. Bauxite mine and alumina refinery workers: mortality and cancer risk ECHO OEM virtual community of learning for primary care. Evaluation of job satisfaction and related factors in wood extraction workers in Gilan province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1