{"title":"P-160 IMPACTS ARISING FROM WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY RESEARCH FOR A GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY","authors":"Jimmy Twin","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Based on work by the Institute for Work & Health (Canada), a research impact framework was co-developed between the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR, Australia) and WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) to measure and evaluate the impact of ISCRR research on policies, procedures and decision-making. This framework has now become a guiding strategy for ISCRR’s research translation activities. Methods This impact framework focusses on three main levels of research impact: i) research dissemination and diffusion, ii) informing decision-making, and iii) contribution towards societal change. All research carried out by ISCRR researchers for WorkSafe Victoria are now assessed for research impact. Results An audit of 35 ISCRR research projects completed between 2019-22 found that 77% (n=27) had achieved some form of impact which informed decision-making. These decision-making impacts ranged from informing internal strategies, treatment options and guidelines, and further research, as well as leading to the development of programs and initiatives. Two research projects demonstrated a connection to preliminary societal level impacts improving the outcome of injured workers. For the research projects without measured decision-making impacts (n=8), these were either too early in their impact journey, or there were difficulties in obtaining research impact metrics. Discussion The majority of ISCRR research for WorkSafe Victoria directly informs decision-making processes. The ability to measure these impacts relies on a proactive approach and champion identification. Conclusion Government authorities strive to make evidence-informed decisions backed by solid research. Research impact measurement and monitoring is important to demonstrate this process and identify opportunities to further impact progression.","PeriodicalId":19452,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqae023.0677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Based on work by the Institute for Work & Health (Canada), a research impact framework was co-developed between the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR, Australia) and WorkSafe Victoria (Australia) to measure and evaluate the impact of ISCRR research on policies, procedures and decision-making. This framework has now become a guiding strategy for ISCRR’s research translation activities. Methods This impact framework focusses on three main levels of research impact: i) research dissemination and diffusion, ii) informing decision-making, and iii) contribution towards societal change. All research carried out by ISCRR researchers for WorkSafe Victoria are now assessed for research impact. Results An audit of 35 ISCRR research projects completed between 2019-22 found that 77% (n=27) had achieved some form of impact which informed decision-making. These decision-making impacts ranged from informing internal strategies, treatment options and guidelines, and further research, as well as leading to the development of programs and initiatives. Two research projects demonstrated a connection to preliminary societal level impacts improving the outcome of injured workers. For the research projects without measured decision-making impacts (n=8), these were either too early in their impact journey, or there were difficulties in obtaining research impact metrics. Discussion The majority of ISCRR research for WorkSafe Victoria directly informs decision-making processes. The ability to measure these impacts relies on a proactive approach and champion identification. Conclusion Government authorities strive to make evidence-informed decisions backed by solid research. Research impact measurement and monitoring is important to demonstrate this process and identify opportunities to further impact progression.