Removal of acephate and methamidophos from water: Coagulation and adsorptive treatment approaches

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124514
Emília Marques Brovini , Mariana de Oliveira , Andressa Rezende Pereira , Maria Elvira Poleti Martucci , Sérgio Francisco de Aquino
{"title":"Removal of acephate and methamidophos from water: Coagulation and adsorptive treatment approaches","authors":"Emília Marques Brovini ,&nbsp;Mariana de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Andressa Rezende Pereira ,&nbsp;Maria Elvira Poleti Martucci ,&nbsp;Sérgio Francisco de Aquino","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pesticides has transformed the agricultural industry, primarily by enhancing productivity. However, the indiscriminate use of such compounds can adversely affect human health and disrupt ecosystem balance. Limited knowledge exists regarding the removal of these compounds from water, particularly for organophosphate pesticides when employing conventional treatment technologies. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the removal of acephate (ACE) and methamidophos (MET) - considered priority pesticides in Brazil - from waters with high and low turbidity during the clarification process carried out with aluminum sulfate (AS) and ferric chloride (FC), either alone or combined with powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption. All water samples were submitted to solid phase extraction (SPE C18 cartridges) prior to acephate and methamidophos analysis by HPLC MS/MS. The clarification process with either AS or FC coagulant did not efficiently remove acephate or methamidophos and maximum average removal (27 %) was observed with waters of high turbidity when using ferric chloride as coagulant. Addition of mineral PAC was also ineffective for removing both pesticides. However, the use of vegetable PAC (10 mg/L) resulted in better removal percentages, up to 80%, but only for methamidophos. The limited removal rates were attributed to the high hydrophilicity of acephate and methamidophos, along with their neutral charge at coagulation pH. These factors hinder the interaction of such organophosphorus pesticides with the flocs formed during coagulation as well as with PAC surface.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"358 ","pages":"Article 124514"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124012284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pesticides has transformed the agricultural industry, primarily by enhancing productivity. However, the indiscriminate use of such compounds can adversely affect human health and disrupt ecosystem balance. Limited knowledge exists regarding the removal of these compounds from water, particularly for organophosphate pesticides when employing conventional treatment technologies. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the removal of acephate (ACE) and methamidophos (MET) - considered priority pesticides in Brazil - from waters with high and low turbidity during the clarification process carried out with aluminum sulfate (AS) and ferric chloride (FC), either alone or combined with powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption. All water samples were submitted to solid phase extraction (SPE C18 cartridges) prior to acephate and methamidophos analysis by HPLC MS/MS. The clarification process with either AS or FC coagulant did not efficiently remove acephate or methamidophos and maximum average removal (27 %) was observed with waters of high turbidity when using ferric chloride as coagulant. Addition of mineral PAC was also ineffective for removing both pesticides. However, the use of vegetable PAC (10 mg/L) resulted in better removal percentages, up to 80%, but only for methamidophos. The limited removal rates were attributed to the high hydrophilicity of acephate and methamidophos, along with their neutral charge at coagulation pH. These factors hinder the interaction of such organophosphorus pesticides with the flocs formed during coagulation as well as with PAC surface.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去除水中的乙酰甲胺磷和甲胺磷:混凝和吸附处理方法。
农药主要通过提高生产力改变了农业。然而,滥用此类化合物会对人类健康造成不利影响,并破坏生态系统平衡。目前,人们对采用传统处理技术从水中去除这些化合物(尤其是有机磷农药)的了解有限。因此,本研究旨在评估在使用硫酸铝(AS)和氯化铁(FC),单独或结合粉末活性炭(PAC)吸附进行澄清的过程中,高浊度和低浊度水体对乙酰甲胺磷(ACE)和甲胺磷(MET)(被认为是巴西的重点农药)的去除情况。在使用 HPLC MS/MS 分析乙酰甲胺磷和甲胺磷之前,所有水样都进行了固相萃取(SPE C18 滤芯)。使用 AS 或 FC 混凝剂的澄清过程不能有效去除乙酰甲胺磷或甲胺磷,使用氯化铁作为混凝剂时,高浊度水体的平均去除率最高(27%)。添加矿物 PAC 也不能有效去除这两种杀虫剂。不过,使用植物性 PAC(10 毫克/升)的去除率更高,可达 80%,但仅限于甲胺磷。去除率有限的原因在于乙酰甲胺磷和甲胺磷的高亲水性,以及它们在混凝 pH 值下的中性电荷。这些因素阻碍了此类有机磷农药与混凝过程中形成的絮团以及 PAC 表面的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
期刊最新文献
Ecological context matters: toward more ecologically realistic fire-ash impact assessments in grassy ecosystems. Beyond accuracy: Stabilizing feature importance in GWRF/RF for soil heavy metal mapping. Clarifying the stability of feature importance rankings in geographically weighted random forest models: A response to prof. Yoshiyasu Takefuji. A tiered framework for ecological risk assessment of contaminants: from model species to local pollution-impacted assemblages. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 mitigates acrolein-driven ferroptosis to preserve kidney function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1