Complex intracranial aneurysms: a DELPHI study to define associated characteristics.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06182-z
Francesco Diana, Michele Romoli, Eytan Raz, Ronit Agid, Felipe C Albuquerque, Adam S Arthur, Jürgen Beck, Jerome Berge, Hieronymus D Boogaarts, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Marco Cenzato, René Chapot, Fady T Charbel, Hubert Desal, Giuseppe Esposito, Johanna T Fifi, Stefan Florian, Andreas Gruber, Ameer E Hassan, Pascal Jabbour, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Miikka Korja, Timo Krings, Giuseppe Lanzino, Torstein R Meling, Jaques Morcos, Pascal J Mosimann, Erez Nossek, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Andreas Raabe, Luca Regli, Veit Rohde, Adnan H Siddiqui, Rokuya Tanikawa, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Alejandro Tomasello, Peter Vajkoczy, Luca Valvassori, Nikolay Velinov, Daniel Walsh, Henry Woo, Bin Xu, Shinichi Yoshimura, Wim H van Zwam, Simone Peschillo
{"title":"Complex intracranial aneurysms: a DELPHI study to define associated characteristics.","authors":"Francesco Diana, Michele Romoli, Eytan Raz, Ronit Agid, Felipe C Albuquerque, Adam S Arthur, Jürgen Beck, Jerome Berge, Hieronymus D Boogaarts, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Marco Cenzato, René Chapot, Fady T Charbel, Hubert Desal, Giuseppe Esposito, Johanna T Fifi, Stefan Florian, Andreas Gruber, Ameer E Hassan, Pascal Jabbour, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Miikka Korja, Timo Krings, Giuseppe Lanzino, Torstein R Meling, Jaques Morcos, Pascal J Mosimann, Erez Nossek, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Andreas Raabe, Luca Regli, Veit Rohde, Adnan H Siddiqui, Rokuya Tanikawa, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Alejandro Tomasello, Peter Vajkoczy, Luca Valvassori, Nikolay Velinov, Daniel Walsh, Henry Woo, Bin Xu, Shinichi Yoshimura, Wim H van Zwam, Simone Peschillo","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06182-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intracranial aneurysms present significant health risks, as their rupture leads to subarachnoid haemorrhage, which in turn has high morbidity and mortality rates. There are several elements affecting the complexity of an intracranial aneurysm. However, criteria for defining a complex intracranial aneurysm (CIA) in open surgery and endovascular treatment could differ, and actually there is no consensus on the definition of a \"complex\" aneurysm. This DELPHI study aims to assess consensus on variables defining a CIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international panel of 50 members, representing various specialties, was recruited to define CIAs through a three-round Delphi process. The panelists participated in surveys with Likert scale responses and open-ended questions. Consensus criteria were established to determine CIA variables, and statistical analysis evaluated consensus and stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In open surgery, CIAs were defined by fusiform or blister-like shape, dissecting aetiology, giant size (≥ 25 mm), broad neck encasing parent arteries, extensive neck surface, wall calcification, intraluminal thrombus, collateral branch from the sac, location (AICA, SCA, basilar), vasospasm context, and planned bypass (EC-IC or IC-IC). For endovascular treatment, CIAs included giant size, very wide neck (dome/neck ratio ≤ 1:1), and collateral branch from the sac.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The definition of aneurysm complexity varies by treatment modality. Since elements related to complexity differ between open surgery and endovascular treatment, these consensus criteria of CIAs could even guide in selecting the best treatment approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06182-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intracranial aneurysms present significant health risks, as their rupture leads to subarachnoid haemorrhage, which in turn has high morbidity and mortality rates. There are several elements affecting the complexity of an intracranial aneurysm. However, criteria for defining a complex intracranial aneurysm (CIA) in open surgery and endovascular treatment could differ, and actually there is no consensus on the definition of a "complex" aneurysm. This DELPHI study aims to assess consensus on variables defining a CIA.

Methods: An international panel of 50 members, representing various specialties, was recruited to define CIAs through a three-round Delphi process. The panelists participated in surveys with Likert scale responses and open-ended questions. Consensus criteria were established to determine CIA variables, and statistical analysis evaluated consensus and stability.

Results: In open surgery, CIAs were defined by fusiform or blister-like shape, dissecting aetiology, giant size (≥ 25 mm), broad neck encasing parent arteries, extensive neck surface, wall calcification, intraluminal thrombus, collateral branch from the sac, location (AICA, SCA, basilar), vasospasm context, and planned bypass (EC-IC or IC-IC). For endovascular treatment, CIAs included giant size, very wide neck (dome/neck ratio ≤ 1:1), and collateral branch from the sac.

Conclusions: The definition of aneurysm complexity varies by treatment modality. Since elements related to complexity differ between open surgery and endovascular treatment, these consensus criteria of CIAs could even guide in selecting the best treatment approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂性颅内动脉瘤:旨在确定相关特征的 DELPHI 研究。
目的:颅内动脉瘤对健康构成重大威胁,因为动脉瘤破裂会导致蛛网膜下腔出血,进而造成高发病率和高死亡率。影响颅内动脉瘤复杂程度的因素有很多。然而,在开放手术和血管内治疗中,对复杂颅内动脉瘤(CIA)的定义标准可能会有所不同,而且实际上对 "复杂 "动脉瘤的定义还没有达成共识。这项 DELPHI 研究旨在评估关于 CIA 定义变量的共识:方法:我们招募了一个由 50 名成员组成的国际小组,他们代表不同的专科,通过三轮德尔菲过程来定义 CIA。小组成员参与了李克特量表回答和开放式问题的调查。通过建立共识标准来确定 CIA 变量,并通过统计分析评估共识和稳定性:在开放手术中,CIA的定义包括:纺锤形或水泡样形状、解剖病因、巨大尺寸(≥ 25 毫米)、宽颈部包裹母动脉、颈部表面广泛、管壁钙化、管腔内血栓、囊内侧枝、位置(AICA、SCA、基底动脉)、血管痉挛背景和计划分流(EC-IC 或 IC-IC)。对于血管内治疗,CIA包括巨型、颈部非常宽(穹顶/颈部比≤1:1)和囊内侧枝:动脉瘤复杂性的定义因治疗方式而异。结论:动脉瘤复杂性的定义因治疗方式而异,由于开放手术和血管内治疗的复杂性要素不同,这些CIA的共识标准甚至可以指导选择最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Contusion expansion, low platelet count and bifrontal contusions are associated with worse patient outcome following traumatic brain injury-a retrospective single-center study. Neuroanatomical photogrammetric models using smartphones: a comparison of apps. How I do it: safe resection of a complex type 3 foramen magnum meningioma with dorsal displacement of the neurovascular bundle. Correction to: Influence of preoperative embolisation on resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: cohort study. Retraction Note: Inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase prevents blood-brain barrier disruption and normalizes the expression of tight junction proteins clautin-5 and ZO-1 in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1