The Accuracy of PUMA Questionnaire in Combination With Peak Expiratory Flow Rate to Identify At-risk, Undiagnosed COPD Patients

IF 8.7 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Archivos De Bronconeumologia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arbres.2024.06.013
Kang-Cheng Su , Yi-Han Hsiao , Hsin-Kuo Ko , Kun-Ta Chou , Tien-Hsin Jeng , Diahn-Warng Perng
{"title":"The Accuracy of PUMA Questionnaire in Combination With Peak Expiratory Flow Rate to Identify At-risk, Undiagnosed COPD Patients","authors":"Kang-Cheng Su ,&nbsp;Yi-Han Hsiao ,&nbsp;Hsin-Kuo Ko ,&nbsp;Kun-Ta Chou ,&nbsp;Tien-Hsin Jeng ,&nbsp;Diahn-Warng Perng","doi":"10.1016/j.arbres.2024.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The English PUMA questionnaire emerges as an effective COPD case-finding tool. We aimed to use the PUMA questionnaire in combination with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) to improve case-finding efficacy in Chinese population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional, observational study included two stages: translating English to Chinese PUMA (C-PUMA) questionnaire with linguistic validation and psychometric evaluation, followed by clinical validation. Eligible participants (with age ≥40 years, respiratory symptoms, smoking history ≥10 pack-years) were enrolled and subjected to three questionnaires (C-PUMA, COPD assessment test [CAT], and generic health survey [SF-12V2]), PEFR measurement, and confirmatory spirometry. The C-PUMA score and PEFR were incorporated into a PUMA-PEFR prediction model applying binary logistic regression coefficients to estimate the probability of COPD (<em>P</em><sub>COPD</sub>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>C-PUMA was finalized through standard forward–backward translation processes and confirmation of good readability, comprehensibility, and reliability. In clinical validation, 240 participants completed the study. 78/240 (32.5%) were diagnosed with COPD. C-PUMA exhibited significant validity (correlated with CAT or physical component scores of SF-12V2, both <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05, respectively). PUMA-PEFR model had higher diagnostic accuracy than C-PUMA alone (area under ROC curve, 0.893 <em>vs.</em> 0.749, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). The best cutoff values of C-PUMA and PUMA-PEFR model (<em>P</em><sub>COPD</sub>) were ≥6 and ≥0.39, accounting for a sensitivity/specificity/numbers needed to screen of 77%/64%/3 and 79%/88%/2, respectively. C-PUMA ≥5 detected more underdiagnosed patients, up to 11.5% (<em>vs.</em> C-PUMA ≥6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>C-PUMA is well-validated. The PUMA-PEFR model provides more accurate and cost-effective case-finding efficacy than C-PUMA alone in at-risk, undiagnosed COPD patients. These tools can be useful to detect COPD early.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8339,"journal":{"name":"Archivos De Bronconeumologia","volume":"60 12","pages":"Pages 737-745"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos De Bronconeumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300289624002345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The English PUMA questionnaire emerges as an effective COPD case-finding tool. We aimed to use the PUMA questionnaire in combination with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) to improve case-finding efficacy in Chinese population.

Methods

This cross-sectional, observational study included two stages: translating English to Chinese PUMA (C-PUMA) questionnaire with linguistic validation and psychometric evaluation, followed by clinical validation. Eligible participants (with age ≥40 years, respiratory symptoms, smoking history ≥10 pack-years) were enrolled and subjected to three questionnaires (C-PUMA, COPD assessment test [CAT], and generic health survey [SF-12V2]), PEFR measurement, and confirmatory spirometry. The C-PUMA score and PEFR were incorporated into a PUMA-PEFR prediction model applying binary logistic regression coefficients to estimate the probability of COPD (PCOPD).

Results

C-PUMA was finalized through standard forward–backward translation processes and confirmation of good readability, comprehensibility, and reliability. In clinical validation, 240 participants completed the study. 78/240 (32.5%) were diagnosed with COPD. C-PUMA exhibited significant validity (correlated with CAT or physical component scores of SF-12V2, both P < 0.05, respectively). PUMA-PEFR model had higher diagnostic accuracy than C-PUMA alone (area under ROC curve, 0.893 vs. 0.749, P < 0.05). The best cutoff values of C-PUMA and PUMA-PEFR model (PCOPD) were ≥6 and ≥0.39, accounting for a sensitivity/specificity/numbers needed to screen of 77%/64%/3 and 79%/88%/2, respectively. C-PUMA ≥5 detected more underdiagnosed patients, up to 11.5% (vs. C-PUMA ≥6).

Conclusion

C-PUMA is well-validated. The PUMA-PEFR model provides more accurate and cost-effective case-finding efficacy than C-PUMA alone in at-risk, undiagnosed COPD patients. These tools can be useful to detect COPD early.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PUMA 问卷与呼气峰流速相结合识别高危、未确诊慢性阻塞性肺病患者的准确性。
简介:英文PUMA问卷是一种有效的慢性阻塞性肺疾病病例查找工具。我们的目的是将 PUMA 问卷与呼气峰流速(PEFR)结合使用,以提高在中国人群中病例查找的有效性:这项横断面观察性研究包括两个阶段:将英文 PUMA(C-PUMA)问卷翻译成中文并进行语言验证和心理测量学评估,然后进行临床验证。符合条件的参与者(年龄≥40岁,有呼吸道症状,吸烟史≥10包年)被纳入研究,并接受了三种问卷调查(C-PUMA、COPD评估测试[CAT]和通用健康调查[SF-12V2])、PEFR测量和确证肺活量测定。将 C-PUMA 评分和 PEFR 纳入 PUMA-PEFR 预测模型,应用二元逻辑回归系数估算 COPD(PCOPD)的概率:结果:C-PUMA 经过标准的前向-后向翻译过程,并确认具有良好的可读性、可理解性和可靠性,最终定稿。在临床验证中,240 名参与者完成了研究。78/240(32.5%)人被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病。C-PUMA显示出明显的有效性(与CAT或SF-12V2的身体成分得分相关,均为PCOPD)分别为≥6和≥0.39,灵敏度/特异性/筛查所需人数分别为77%/64%/3和79%/88%/2。结论:C-PUMA≥5能发现更多诊断不足的患者,比例高达11.5%(与C-PUMA≥6相比):结论:C-PUMA 具有良好的有效性。对于高危、未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺病患者,PUMA-PEFR 模型比单独使用 C-PUMA 更准确、更经济有效。这些工具有助于早期发现慢性阻塞性肺病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos De Bronconeumologia
Archivos De Bronconeumologia Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
17.50%
发文量
330
审稿时长
14 days
期刊介绍: Archivos de Bronconeumologia is a scientific journal that specializes in publishing prospective original research articles focusing on various aspects of respiratory diseases, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical practice, surgery, and basic investigation. Additionally, the journal features other types of articles such as reviews, editorials, special articles of interest to the society and editorial board, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and clinical images. Published monthly, the journal comprises 12 regular issues along with occasional supplements containing articles from different sections. All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo rigorous evaluation by the editors and are subjected to expert peer review. The editorial team, led by the Editor and/or an Associate Editor, manages the peer-review process. Archivos de Bronconeumologia is published monthly in English, facilitating broad dissemination of the latest research findings in the field.
期刊最新文献
Persistent Blood Eosinophilia and Eosinopenia: Relationship with Outcomes in Bronchiectasis. Characterization of Inactive COPD Patients: Barriers to Physical Activity and Perceived Impact of Inactivity. Editorial Board Contents Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Serum and Urine With DIA Mass Spectrometry Reveals Biomarkers for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1