The Attachment Script Assessment: Introduction of a coding system to evaluate deactivation, hyperactivation, and anomalous content.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Attachment & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1080/14616734.2024.2367324
Ashley M Groh, Katherine C Haydon
{"title":"The Attachment Script Assessment: Introduction of a coding system to evaluate deactivation, hyperactivation, and anomalous content.","authors":"Ashley M Groh, Katherine C Haydon","doi":"10.1080/14616734.2024.2367324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although research on adult attachment has yielded insight into the legacy of attachment for functioning in adulthood, methodological challenges persist in the assessment of adult attachment. The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) offers a rich assessment of secure, insecure, and unresolved states of mind. However, it is resource intensive to administer and code. Attachment Script Assessment (ASA) offers a resource-effective alternative to the AAI. However, the ASA coding system only yields a single, security-like dimension: secure base script knowledge. Here, we introduce a complementary coding system for the ASA to assess attachment deactivation (i.e. script characterized by limited interpersonal connection and minimization of attachment problems/emotions), hyperactivation (i.e. script in which attachment-relevant problems and negative emotions are heightened), and anomalous content (i.e. script in which attachment problems contain elements of fear and/or disorientation); and we discuss the conceptual convergence of these scripts with corresponding patterns of attachment insecurity and disorganization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8632,"journal":{"name":"Attachment & Human Development","volume":"26 3","pages":"203-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2024.2367324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although research on adult attachment has yielded insight into the legacy of attachment for functioning in adulthood, methodological challenges persist in the assessment of adult attachment. The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) offers a rich assessment of secure, insecure, and unresolved states of mind. However, it is resource intensive to administer and code. Attachment Script Assessment (ASA) offers a resource-effective alternative to the AAI. However, the ASA coding system only yields a single, security-like dimension: secure base script knowledge. Here, we introduce a complementary coding system for the ASA to assess attachment deactivation (i.e. script characterized by limited interpersonal connection and minimization of attachment problems/emotions), hyperactivation (i.e. script in which attachment-relevant problems and negative emotions are heightened), and anomalous content (i.e. script in which attachment problems contain elements of fear and/or disorientation); and we discuss the conceptual convergence of these scripts with corresponding patterns of attachment insecurity and disorganization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
依恋脚本评估:采用编码系统评估失活、超活和异常内容。
尽管对成人依恋的研究已经让人们深入了解了依恋对成年后功能的影响,但在评估成人依恋的方法上仍然存在挑战。成人依恋访谈(AAI)可对安全、不安全和未解决的心理状态进行丰富的评估。但是,该方法的实施和编码需要大量资源。依恋脚本评估(ASA)为 AAI 提供了一种资源有效的替代方法。然而,ASA 编码系统只能生成单一的安全类维度:安全基础脚本知识。在此,我们为依恋脚本评估引入了一个补充编码系统,以评估依恋失活(即以有限的人际联系和依恋问题/情绪最小化为特征的脚本)、超活(即依恋相关问题和负面情绪增强的脚本)和异常内容(即依恋问题包含恐惧和/或迷失元素的脚本);我们还讨论了这些脚本与相应的依恋不安全和无组织模式的概念趋同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Attachment & Human Development
Attachment & Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Attachment & Human Development is the leading forum for the presentation of empirical research, reviews and clinical case studies that reflect contemporary advances in attachment theory and research. The journal addresses the growing demand from the domains of psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and related disciplines including nursing and social work, for a clear presentation of ideas, methods and research based on attachment theory.
期刊最新文献
A call to represent the current diversity of family forms in attachment research. Exploring the cross-cultural validity of attachment theory: a study of Egyptian mother-child dyads using the Strange Situation Procedure. Secure base script knowledge and friendship quality as protective factors for bullying and victimization in elementary school. Celebrating more than 26,000 adult attachment interviews: mapping the main adult attachment classifications on personal, social, and clinical status. What do we know about parental embodied mentalizing? A systematic review of the construct, assessment, empirical findings, gaps and further steps.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1