Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization among Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2001 to 2018.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0225
Christine D Hsu, Xiaoying Yu, Fangjian Guo, Victor Adekanmbi, Yong-Fang Kuo, Jordan Westra, Abbey B Berenson
{"title":"Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization among Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2001 to 2018.","authors":"Christine D Hsu, Xiaoying Yu, Fangjian Guo, Victor Adekanmbi, Yong-Fang Kuo, Jordan Westra, Abbey B Berenson","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have elevated risks of cervical precancers and cancers and guidelines recommend more frequent cervical cancer screening exams. However, little is known about current trends in cervical cancer screening in this unique population. We described patterns in the uptake of cervical cancer screening exams among female KTRs and identified factors associated with screening utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included female KTRs between 20 and 65 years old, with Texas Medicare fee-for-service coverage, who received a transplant between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2017. We determined the cumulative incidence of receiving cervical cancer screening post-transplant using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes and assessed factors associated with screening utilization, using the Fine and Gray model to account for competing events. Subdistribution hazard models were used to assess factors associated with screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,653 KTRs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of initiating a cervical cancer screening exam post-transplant were 31.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.0%-33.6%], 48.0% (95% CI, 46.2%-49.9%), and 58.5% (95% CI, 56.7%-60.3%), respectively. KTRs who were 55 to 64 years old (vs. <45 years old) and those with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score post-transplant were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cervical cancer screening uptake is low in the years immediately following a kidney transplant.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our findings highlight a need for interventions to improve cervical cancer screening utilization among kidney transplant recipients. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1554.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1678-1682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have elevated risks of cervical precancers and cancers and guidelines recommend more frequent cervical cancer screening exams. However, little is known about current trends in cervical cancer screening in this unique population. We described patterns in the uptake of cervical cancer screening exams among female KTRs and identified factors associated with screening utilization.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included female KTRs between 20 and 65 years old, with Texas Medicare fee-for-service coverage, who received a transplant between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2017. We determined the cumulative incidence of receiving cervical cancer screening post-transplant using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes and assessed factors associated with screening utilization, using the Fine and Gray model to account for competing events. Subdistribution hazard models were used to assess factors associated with screening uptake.

Results: Among 2,653 KTRs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of initiating a cervical cancer screening exam post-transplant were 31.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.0%-33.6%], 48.0% (95% CI, 46.2%-49.9%), and 58.5% (95% CI, 56.7%-60.3%), respectively. KTRs who were 55 to 64 years old (vs. <45 years old) and those with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score post-transplant were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening post-transplant.

Conclusions: Cervical cancer screening uptake is low in the years immediately following a kidney transplant.

Impact: Our findings highlight a need for interventions to improve cervical cancer screening utilization among kidney transplant recipients. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1554.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2001-2018年肾移植受者宫颈癌筛查利用率。
背景:肾移植受者(KTRs)罹患宫颈癌前病变和癌症的风险较高,因此指南建议更频繁地进行宫颈癌筛查。然而,人们对这一特殊人群目前的宫颈癌筛查趋势知之甚少。我们描述了女性 KTR 接受宫颈癌筛查的模式,并确定了与筛查利用率相关的因素:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了年龄在 20-65 岁之间、享受德克萨斯州医疗保险付费服务的女性 KTR,她们在 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受了移植手术。我们使用 ICD-9、ICD-10 和 CPT 编码确定了移植后接受宫颈癌筛查的累积发病率,并使用 Fine and Gray 模型评估了与筛查利用率相关的因素,以考虑竞争事件。使用子分布危险模型评估与筛查接受率相关的因素:在符合纳入和排除标准的 2,653 名 KTR 中,移植后 1 年、2 年和 3 年的宫颈癌筛查累积发生率分别为 31.7%(95% 置信区间 (CI),30.0-33.6%)、48.0%(95% CI,46.2-49.9%)和 58.5%(95% CI,56.7-60.3%)。年龄在 55-64 岁之间的 KTR(与年龄在 55-64 岁之间的 KTR 相比)的宫颈癌筛查率分别为 48.0%(95% CI,46.2-49.9%)、58.5%(95% CI,56.7-60.3在肾移植后的几年中,宫颈癌筛查的接受率很低:我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要采取干预措施提高 KTR 接受宫颈癌筛查的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Urinary Levels of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Breast Density in Young Women. Evaluating Efficacy of Cervical HPV-HR DNA Testing as Alternative to PET/CT Imaging for Posttreatment Cancer Surveillance: Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study. Food Insecurity and Clinical Biomarkers of Inflammation among Cancer Survivors in the All of Us Research Program. Highly Sensitive DNA Testing of Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Tumors. Rurality of Residence and Distance to Clinic Are Risk Factors for Non-engagement in Childhood Cancer Survivor Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1