Developmental defects of enamel in childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European journal of paediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.23804/ejpd.2024.2256
A Allam, N Camoni, S Cirio, C Salerno, G Campus, M G Cagetti
{"title":"Developmental defects of enamel in childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"A Allam, N Camoni, S Cirio, C Salerno, G Campus, M G Cagetti","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2024.2256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero registration number: CRD42023472016) aims to assess the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDEs), qualitatively and/or quantitatively, in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and evaluate, when possible, these data in comparison with those found in healthy children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from January 2003 to January 2024 for studies reporting on DDEs in children with a mean age not exceeding 16 years at the time of the study who underwent antineoplastic therapy. The ROBINS-I and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Included studies with comparable outcomes underwent random effects models meta-analysis using Stata®18.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCS showed a higher prevalence of DDEs, both qualitative and quantitative, compared to healthy children. The meta- analysis showed higher odds of developing qualitative defects over quantitative defects in CCS. Conclusions regarding the association between the type of therapy administered, age of therapy initiation, and prevalence of DDEs could not be drawn due to insufficient data. A lack of a standardized method of detecting enamel defects posed a challenge in the qualitative and quantitative analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2024.2256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The present systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero registration number: CRD42023472016) aims to assess the prevalence of developmental defects of enamel (DDEs), qualitatively and/or quantitatively, in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and evaluate, when possible, these data in comparison with those found in healthy children.

Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from January 2003 to January 2024 for studies reporting on DDEs in children with a mean age not exceeding 16 years at the time of the study who underwent antineoplastic therapy. The ROBINS-I and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Included studies with comparable outcomes underwent random effects models meta-analysis using Stata®18.

Conclusion: CCS showed a higher prevalence of DDEs, both qualitative and quantitative, compared to healthy children. The meta- analysis showed higher odds of developing qualitative defects over quantitative defects in CCS. Conclusions regarding the association between the type of therapy administered, age of therapy initiation, and prevalence of DDEs could not be drawn due to insufficient data. A lack of a standardized method of detecting enamel defects posed a challenge in the qualitative and quantitative analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童癌症幸存者的釉质发育缺陷:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析(Prospero注册号:CRD42023472016)旨在定性和/或定量评估儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)牙釉质发育缺陷(DDEs)的发生率,并尽可能将这些数据与健康儿童的数据进行比较评估:从 2003 年 1 月到 2024 年 1 月,我们在三个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus)中搜索了有关接受抗肿瘤治疗的平均年龄不超过 16 岁的儿童 DDEs 的研究报告。采用 ROBINS-I 和 Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) 工具评估偏倚风险。使用 Stata®18 对纳入的具有可比结果的研究进行随机效应模型 meta 分析:结论:与健康儿童相比,儿童营养服务在定性和定量方面都显示出更高的 DDEs 患病率。元分析表明,在儿童慢性疾病患者中,出现定性缺陷的几率高于定量缺陷。由于数据不足,无法就治疗类型、开始治疗的年龄与 DDEs 患病率之间的关联得出结论。缺乏检测釉质缺陷的标准化方法给定性和定量分析带来了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of paediatric dentistry
European journal of paediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Caries Activity Tests and Associated Factors among 3-5-Year-Old Preschool Children in Zhao County, Hebei Province, China. Laser and remineralising agents in dental erosion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Combined surgical luxation and orthodontic traction treatment of a severely infraoccluded primary molar with deep caries: a case report and literature review. Effects of Medication on Asthma and the Development of Caries Cavities in Children Aged 3-15 at Luz Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. Nasal bone modification compared to normal growth after rapid maxillary expansion anchored onto deciduous teeth: a CBCT retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1