Force reserve predicts compensation in reaching movement with induced shoulder strength deficit.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1152/jn.00143.2024
Germain Faity, Victor R Barradas, Nicolas Schweighofer, Denis Mottet
{"title":"Force reserve predicts compensation in reaching movement with induced shoulder strength deficit.","authors":"Germain Faity, Victor R Barradas, Nicolas Schweighofer, Denis Mottet","doi":"10.1152/jn.00143.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following events such as fatigue or stroke, individuals often move their trunks forward during reaching, leveraging a broader muscle group even when only arm movement would suffice. In previous work, we showed the existence of a \"force reserve\": a phenomenon where individuals, when challenged with a heavy weight, adjusted their motor coordination to preserve approximately 40% of their shoulder's force. Here, we investigated if such reserve can predict hip, shoulder, and elbow movements and torques resulting from an induced shoulder strength deficit. We engaged 20 healthy participants in a reaching task with incrementally heavier dumbbells, analyzing arm and trunk movements via motion capture and joint torques through inverse dynamics. We simulated these movements using an optimal control model of a 3-degree-of-freedom upper body, contrasting three cost functions: traditional sum of squared torques, a force reserve function incorporating a nonlinear penalty, and a normalized torque function. Our results demonstrate a clear increase in trunk movement correlated with heavier dumbbell weights, with participants employing compensatory movements to maintain a shoulder force reserve of approximately 40% of maximum torque. Simulations showed that while traditional and reserve functions accurately predicted trunk compensation, only the reserve function effectively predicted joint torques under heavier weights. These findings suggest that compensatory movements are strategically employed to minimize shoulder effort and distribute load across multiple joints in response to weakness. We discuss the implications of the force reserve cost function in the context of optimal control of human movements and its relevance for understanding compensatory movements poststroke.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Our study reveals key findings on compensatory movements during upper limb reaching tasks under shoulder strength deficits, as observed poststroke. Using heavy dumbbells with healthy volunteers, we demonstrate how forward trunk displacement conserves around 40% of shoulder strength reserve during reaching. We show that an optimal controller employing a cost function combining squared motor torque and a nonlinear penalty for excessive muscle activation outperforms traditional controllers in predicting torques and compensatory movements in these scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00143.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following events such as fatigue or stroke, individuals often move their trunks forward during reaching, leveraging a broader muscle group even when only arm movement would suffice. In previous work, we showed the existence of a "force reserve": a phenomenon where individuals, when challenged with a heavy weight, adjusted their motor coordination to preserve approximately 40% of their shoulder's force. Here, we investigated if such reserve can predict hip, shoulder, and elbow movements and torques resulting from an induced shoulder strength deficit. We engaged 20 healthy participants in a reaching task with incrementally heavier dumbbells, analyzing arm and trunk movements via motion capture and joint torques through inverse dynamics. We simulated these movements using an optimal control model of a 3-degree-of-freedom upper body, contrasting three cost functions: traditional sum of squared torques, a force reserve function incorporating a nonlinear penalty, and a normalized torque function. Our results demonstrate a clear increase in trunk movement correlated with heavier dumbbell weights, with participants employing compensatory movements to maintain a shoulder force reserve of approximately 40% of maximum torque. Simulations showed that while traditional and reserve functions accurately predicted trunk compensation, only the reserve function effectively predicted joint torques under heavier weights. These findings suggest that compensatory movements are strategically employed to minimize shoulder effort and distribute load across multiple joints in response to weakness. We discuss the implications of the force reserve cost function in the context of optimal control of human movements and its relevance for understanding compensatory movements poststroke.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study reveals key findings on compensatory movements during upper limb reaching tasks under shoulder strength deficits, as observed poststroke. Using heavy dumbbells with healthy volunteers, we demonstrate how forward trunk displacement conserves around 40% of shoulder strength reserve during reaching. We show that an optimal controller employing a cost function combining squared motor torque and a nonlinear penalty for excessive muscle activation outperforms traditional controllers in predicting torques and compensatory movements in these scenarios.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
力储备可预测肩部力量不足情况下的伸展运动补偿。
在疲劳或中风等情况下,人在伸手时往往会将躯干向前移动,即使仅靠手臂运动就足够了,也会利用更广泛的肌肉群。在之前的研究中,我们发现了 "力量储备 "的存在--在面对重物时,个体会调整运动协调,以保留约 40% 的肩部力量。在此,我们研究了这种力量储备是否能预测髋、肩和肘关节的运动以及因肩部力量不足而产生的扭矩。我们让 20 名健康的参与者参与了一项用逐渐变重的哑铃伸手的任务,通过运动捕捉分析手臂和躯干的运动,并通过逆动力学分析关节扭矩。我们使用三自由度上半身优化控制模型模拟了这些动作,并对比了三种成本函数:传统的扭矩平方和、包含非线性惩罚的力储备函数和归一化扭矩函数。我们的结果表明,随着哑铃重量的增加,躯干运动明显增加,参与者通过补偿性运动来保持约为最大扭矩 40% 的肩部力量储备。模拟结果表明,虽然传统函数和储备函数能准确预测躯干补偿,但只有储备函数能有效预测较重重量下的关节扭矩。这些研究结果表明,在肩部无力的情况下,可以有策略地采用代偿动作来尽量减少肩部用力,并在多个关节之间分配负荷。我们讨论了力储备成本函数在人类运动优化控制中的意义,以及它对理解中风后代偿运动的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
A 5-week centrifuge-based G training with feedback on the magnitude of G force, does not improve the perception of roll tilt during simulated coordinated turns. ALTERED CONTROL OF BREATHING IN A RAT MODEL OF ALLERGIC LOWER AIRWAY INFLAMMATION. Ictal and interictal epileptic networks of 34 patients with Hypothalamic Hamartoma on scalp electroencephalography. Investigating premotor corticospinal excitability in fast and slow voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors. Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1