Development of Data Quality Indicators for Improving Hospital International Classification of Diseases-Coded Health Data Quality Globally.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002024
Lucía Otero-Varela, Namneet Sandhu, Robin L Walker, Danielle A Southern, Hude Quan, Cathy A Eastwood
{"title":"Development of Data Quality Indicators for Improving Hospital International Classification of Diseases-Coded Health Data Quality Globally.","authors":"Lucía Otero-Varela, Namneet Sandhu, Robin L Walker, Danielle A Southern, Hude Quan, Cathy A Eastwood","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital inpatient data, coded using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), is widely used to monitor diseases, allocate resources and funding, and evaluate patient outcomes. As such, hospital data quality should be measured before use; however, currently, there is no standard and international approach to assess ICD-coded data quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a standardized method for assessing hospital ICD-coded data quality that could be applied across countries: Data quality indicators (DQIs).</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>To identify a set of candidate DQIs, we performed an environmental scan, reviewing gray and academic literature on data quality frameworks and existing methods to assess data quality. Indicators from the literature were then appraised and selected through a 3-round Delphi process. The first round involved face-to-face group and individual meetings for idea generation, while the second and third rounds were conducted remotely to collect online ratings. Final DQIs were selected based on the panelists' quantitative and qualitative feedback.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Participants included international experts with expertise in administrative health data, data quality, and ICD coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting 24 DQIs encompass 5 dimensions of data quality: relevance, accuracy and reliability; comparability and coherence; timeliness; and Accessibility and clarity. These will help stakeholders (eg, World Health Organization) to assess hospital data quality using the same standard across countries and highlight areas in need of improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel area of research will facilitate international comparisons of ICD-coded data quality and be valuable to future studies and initiatives aimed at improving hospital administrative data quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital inpatient data, coded using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), is widely used to monitor diseases, allocate resources and funding, and evaluate patient outcomes. As such, hospital data quality should be measured before use; however, currently, there is no standard and international approach to assess ICD-coded data quality.

Objective: To develop a standardized method for assessing hospital ICD-coded data quality that could be applied across countries: Data quality indicators (DQIs).

Research design: To identify a set of candidate DQIs, we performed an environmental scan, reviewing gray and academic literature on data quality frameworks and existing methods to assess data quality. Indicators from the literature were then appraised and selected through a 3-round Delphi process. The first round involved face-to-face group and individual meetings for idea generation, while the second and third rounds were conducted remotely to collect online ratings. Final DQIs were selected based on the panelists' quantitative and qualitative feedback.

Subjects: Participants included international experts with expertise in administrative health data, data quality, and ICD coding.

Results: The resulting 24 DQIs encompass 5 dimensions of data quality: relevance, accuracy and reliability; comparability and coherence; timeliness; and Accessibility and clarity. These will help stakeholders (eg, World Health Organization) to assess hospital data quality using the same standard across countries and highlight areas in need of improvement.

Conclusions: This novel area of research will facilitate international comparisons of ICD-coded data quality and be valuable to future studies and initiatives aimed at improving hospital administrative data quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定数据质量指标,提高全球医院国际疾病分类健康数据质量。
背景:使用《国际疾病分类》(ICD)编码的医院住院患者数据被广泛用于监测疾病、分配资源和资金以及评估患者疗效。因此,在使用前应衡量医院数据的质量;然而,目前还没有标准的国际方法来评估 ICD 编码数据的质量:目的:制定一种可在各国适用的评估医院 ICD 编码数据质量的标准化方法:数据质量指标(DQIs):为了确定一套候选的 DQIs,我们进行了环境扫描,查阅了有关数据质量框架和现有数据质量评估方法的灰色文献和学术文献。然后,我们对文献中的指标进行了评估,并通过三轮德尔菲程序选出了指标。第一轮是面对面的小组和个人会议,以产生想法;第二轮和第三轮是远程进行的,以收集在线评分。根据小组成员的定量和定性反馈,选出了最终的 DQI:参与者包括在行政健康数据、数据质量和 ICD 编码方面拥有专业知识的国际专家:结果:得出的 24 个 DQI 包含数据质量的 5 个方面:相关性、准确性和可靠性;可比性和一致性;及时性;可获取性和清晰性。这将有助于利益相关方(如世界卫生组织)使用相同的标准评估各国医院的数据质量,并突出需要改进的领域:这一新颖的研究领域将促进 ICD 编码数据质量的国际比较,并对未来旨在提高医院管理数据质量的研究和倡议具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Homelessness With Primary Care and Acute Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth. Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study. Children and Youth Are a Critical Part of the American Story of Homelessness. Trajectories and Transitions in Service Use Among Older Veterans at High Risk of Long-Term Institutional Care. Conduct of Large, Multisite, Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research Studies: Learnings From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Palliative Care Learning Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1