The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.2196/53308
Soheil Hassanipour, Sandeep Nayak, Ali Bozorgi, Mohammad-Hossein Keivanlou, Tirth Dave, Abdulhadi Alotaibi, Farahnaz Joukar, Parinaz Mellatdoust, Arash Bakhshi, Dona Kuriyakose, Lakshmi D Polisetty, Mallika Chimpiri, Ehsan Amini-Salehi
{"title":"The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis.","authors":"Soheil Hassanipour, Sandeep Nayak, Ali Bozorgi, Mohammad-Hossein Keivanlou, Tirth Dave, Abdulhadi Alotaibi, Farahnaz Joukar, Parinaz Mellatdoust, Arash Bakhshi, Dona Kuriyakose, Lakshmi D Polisetty, Mallika Chimpiri, Ehsan Amini-Salehi","doi":"10.2196/53308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of ChatGPT by OpenAI has garnered significant attention. Among its capabilities, paraphrasing stands out.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the satisfactory levels of plagiarism in the paraphrased text produced by this chatbot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three texts of varying lengths were presented to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was then instructed to paraphrase the provided texts using five different prompts. In the subsequent stage of the study, the texts were divided into separate paragraphs, and ChatGPT was requested to paraphrase each paragraph individually. Lastly, in the third stage, ChatGPT was asked to paraphrase the texts it had previously generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average plagiarism rate in the texts generated by ChatGPT was 45% (SD 10%). ChatGPT exhibited a substantial reduction in plagiarism for the provided texts (mean difference -0.51, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.48; P<.001). Furthermore, when comparing the second attempt with the initial attempt, a significant decrease in the plagiarism rate was observed (mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03; P<.001). The number of paragraphs in the texts demonstrated a noteworthy association with the percentage of plagiarism, with texts consisting of a single paragraph exhibiting the lowest plagiarism rate (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ChatGPT demonstrates a notable reduction of plagiarism within texts, the existing levels of plagiarism remain relatively high. This underscores a crucial caution for researchers when incorporating this chatbot into their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"10 ","pages":"e53308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of ChatGPT by OpenAI has garnered significant attention. Among its capabilities, paraphrasing stands out.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the satisfactory levels of plagiarism in the paraphrased text produced by this chatbot.

Methods: Three texts of varying lengths were presented to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was then instructed to paraphrase the provided texts using five different prompts. In the subsequent stage of the study, the texts were divided into separate paragraphs, and ChatGPT was requested to paraphrase each paragraph individually. Lastly, in the third stage, ChatGPT was asked to paraphrase the texts it had previously generated.

Results: The average plagiarism rate in the texts generated by ChatGPT was 45% (SD 10%). ChatGPT exhibited a substantial reduction in plagiarism for the provided texts (mean difference -0.51, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.48; P<.001). Furthermore, when comparing the second attempt with the initial attempt, a significant decrease in the plagiarism rate was observed (mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03; P<.001). The number of paragraphs in the texts demonstrated a noteworthy association with the percentage of plagiarism, with texts consisting of a single paragraph exhibiting the lowest plagiarism rate (P<.001).

Conclusions: Although ChatGPT demonstrates a notable reduction of plagiarism within texts, the existing levels of plagiarism remain relatively high. This underscores a crucial caution for researchers when incorporating this chatbot into their work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 在转述文本和减少抄袭方面的能力:描述性分析
背景:OpenAI 推出的 ChatGPT 备受关注。其中,转述功能尤为突出:本研究旨在调查该聊天机器人生成的转述文本中令人满意的抄袭水平:方法:向 ChatGPT 演示三篇长短不一的文章。方法:向 ChatGPT 演示三篇长短不一的文章,然后指示 ChatGPT 使用五种不同的提示对所提供的文章进行转述。在随后的研究阶段,文本被分成不同的段落,要求 ChatGPT 对每个段落进行单独转述。最后,在第三阶段,要求 ChatGPT 对其之前生成的文本进行转述:结果:ChatGPT 生成的文本的平均抄袭率为 45%(SD 10%)。ChatGPT 显著降低了所提供文本的抄袭率(平均差值为-0.51,95% CI 为-0.54 至-0.48;PC 结论:虽然 ChatGPT 降低了所提供文本的抄袭率,但抄袭率并没有因此而降低:尽管 ChatGPT 显著减少了课文中的抄袭现象,但现有的抄袭水平仍然相对较高。这就强调了研究人员在将该聊天机器人应用到工作中时的重要注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study. Leveraging Open-Source Large Language Models for Data Augmentation in Hospital Staff Surveys: Mixed Methods Study. Virtual Reality Simulation in Undergraduate Health Care Education Programs: Usability Study. Correction: Psychological Safety Competency Training During the Clinical Internship From the Perspective of Health Care Trainee Mentors in 11 Pan-European Countries: Mixed Methods Observational Study. ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1