Evaluating educational apps for preschoolers: Differences and agreements between the assessments of experts, parents, and their children

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108361
Astrid Wirth , Anna Mues , Efsun Birtwistle , Frank Niklas
{"title":"Evaluating educational apps for preschoolers: Differences and agreements between the assessments of experts, parents, and their children","authors":"Astrid Wirth ,&nbsp;Anna Mues ,&nbsp;Efsun Birtwistle ,&nbsp;Frank Niklas","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Educational apps offer a wide range of opportunities to foster children's early competency development during preschool age. However, due to inconsistent evaluation criteria, comparing the educational value of different apps is challenging, and conclusive data on children's and parent's preferences in choosing educational apps for preschoolers is lacking. In the present study, we analyse differences and agreements between the assessments of educational apps by scientific experts, parents, and their children, and compare their assessments with children's actual usage times. In sum, <em>N</em> = 400 children aged between 51 and 75 months (<em>M</em> = 60.9; <em>SD</em> = 4.5) obtained tablets to use at home for 10 consecutive months, with educational apps specifically developed to foster preschool children's cognitive, mathematical, and linguistic competences. Scientific experts rated children's apps according to the evaluation criteria by Hirsh-Pasek et al. (2015), while parents and children rated the respective apps with school grades, data was assessed at t1 (after 5 months) and t2 (after 10 months). Results show that children are less likely to play with apps with a higher educational value and rate them lower compared to ratings by scientific experts. Significant associations were found between the app ratings of parents and their children. With these findings, the present study provides insights into children's app preferences und usage behaviour especially in the context of family environment. The results highlight the importance of thoroughly researching and considering the perspectives of both parents and children to design apps that are enjoyable and played for extended periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002292/pdfft?md5=6a88950cb393603ab5acbc318a6b40b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224002292-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002292","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational apps offer a wide range of opportunities to foster children's early competency development during preschool age. However, due to inconsistent evaluation criteria, comparing the educational value of different apps is challenging, and conclusive data on children's and parent's preferences in choosing educational apps for preschoolers is lacking. In the present study, we analyse differences and agreements between the assessments of educational apps by scientific experts, parents, and their children, and compare their assessments with children's actual usage times. In sum, N = 400 children aged between 51 and 75 months (M = 60.9; SD = 4.5) obtained tablets to use at home for 10 consecutive months, with educational apps specifically developed to foster preschool children's cognitive, mathematical, and linguistic competences. Scientific experts rated children's apps according to the evaluation criteria by Hirsh-Pasek et al. (2015), while parents and children rated the respective apps with school grades, data was assessed at t1 (after 5 months) and t2 (after 10 months). Results show that children are less likely to play with apps with a higher educational value and rate them lower compared to ratings by scientific experts. Significant associations were found between the app ratings of parents and their children. With these findings, the present study provides insights into children's app preferences und usage behaviour especially in the context of family environment. The results highlight the importance of thoroughly researching and considering the perspectives of both parents and children to design apps that are enjoyable and played for extended periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估学龄前儿童教育应用程序:专家、家长及其子女的评估之间的差异与共识
教育应用程序为促进学龄前儿童早期能力发展提供了广泛的机会。然而,由于评价标准不一致,比较不同应用程序的教育价值具有挑战性,而且缺乏有关儿童和家长在选择学龄前儿童教育应用程序时的偏好的确凿数据。在本研究中,我们分析了科学专家、家长及其子女对教育应用程序评价的差异和一致之处,并将他们的评价与儿童的实际使用时间进行了比较。总之,N = 400 名年龄在 51 到 75 个月之间的儿童(M = 60.9;SD = 4.5)连续 10 个月在家中使用平板电脑,这些平板电脑装有专门为培养学龄前儿童的认知、数学和语言能力而开发的教育应用程序。科学专家根据 Hirsh-Pasek 等人(2015 年)的评价标准对儿童的应用程序进行评分,而家长和儿童则根据学校成绩对相应的应用程序进行评分,数据在 t1(5 个月后)和 t2(10 个月后)进行评估。结果显示,与科学专家的评分相比,儿童不太可能玩教育价值较高的应用程序,而且对这些应用程序的评分也较低。父母和子女对应用程序的评价之间存在显著关联。通过这些发现,本研究对儿童的应用程序偏好和使用行为,尤其是在家庭环境中的偏好和使用行为提供了深入的见解。研究结果凸显了深入研究并考虑家长和儿童双方观点的重要性,从而设计出令人愉悦并可长时间使用的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Theory of consumption value: A lens to examine the use and continual use intention of online game subscription services Smartphone's on, humanness's off: Phubbing breeds dehumanization via subjectivity uncertainty Editorial Board Personalized context-aware systems for sustainable agriculture development using ubiquitous devices and adaptive learning The affective and relational correlates of algorithmic beliefs among U.S. online daters: Extension of two previous studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1