{"title":"How fluency-enhancing conditions reduce stuttering. A unified explanation","authors":"Torsten Hesse","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Developmental stuttering is a speech disorder that affects about one percent of the adult population worldwide. The cause is still unknown, but not a few researchers have suspected poor auditory-motor integration to be a causal factor. Almost all people who stutter are more or totally fluent in certain conditions, for instance, when speaking in chorus or alone to themselves, in time with the clicking of a metronome, or with delayed or frequency-altered auditory feedback. Understanding why stuttering disappears in these specific conditions could help understand why it occurs in normal speaking conditions. Here, the first unified account for the effect is proposed, based on evidence that receptive speech processing depends on attention to the speech signal. It is proposed that fluency-enhancing conditions re-allocate the speaker’s attention, that is, the perceptual and processing capacities, by drawing attention to the auditory feedback of speech. This improves auditory-motor integration, which reduces stuttering. The hypothesis is discussed for all well-known fluency-enhancing conditions, and consequences for therapy are outlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 111415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724001580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Developmental stuttering is a speech disorder that affects about one percent of the adult population worldwide. The cause is still unknown, but not a few researchers have suspected poor auditory-motor integration to be a causal factor. Almost all people who stutter are more or totally fluent in certain conditions, for instance, when speaking in chorus or alone to themselves, in time with the clicking of a metronome, or with delayed or frequency-altered auditory feedback. Understanding why stuttering disappears in these specific conditions could help understand why it occurs in normal speaking conditions. Here, the first unified account for the effect is proposed, based on evidence that receptive speech processing depends on attention to the speech signal. It is proposed that fluency-enhancing conditions re-allocate the speaker’s attention, that is, the perceptual and processing capacities, by drawing attention to the auditory feedback of speech. This improves auditory-motor integration, which reduces stuttering. The hypothesis is discussed for all well-known fluency-enhancing conditions, and consequences for therapy are outlined.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.