Modulating taste and trigeminal sensations in food models to assess individual variations in sensory and hedonic responses to food

Angelica Lippi , Caterina Dinnella , Sara Spinelli , Agnès Giboreau , Véronique Mourier , Erminio Monteleone
{"title":"Modulating taste and trigeminal sensations in food models to assess individual variations in sensory and hedonic responses to food","authors":"Angelica Lippi ,&nbsp;Caterina Dinnella ,&nbsp;Sara Spinelli ,&nbsp;Agnès Giboreau ,&nbsp;Véronique Mourier ,&nbsp;Erminio Monteleone","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>Adoption and maintenance of healthy diets among vulnerable populations, such as cancer patients, can be challenging. The preliminary study of sensory-hedonic responses through the modulation of key sensory properties in food models in healthy participants, could contribute to explore a new method to answer to nutrition in cancer's issue. Sensory and hedonic responses are affected, among other factors, by sensory responsiveness and psychological traits.</p><p>With the perspective of using the approach to investigate individual differences in sensory and hedonic responses in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy experiencing taste alterations, two food models were designed and pre-tested with healthy participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>223 healthy participants (68% women, 18–70 y.o., 40 mean age; 118 from France and 105 from Italy) participated in the study. Sensory-hedonic responses to four apple juice samples, spiked with four increasing concentrations of mint syrup corresponding to variations in perceived coolness, and to four chickpea cream samples, spiked with glucose-fructose syrup to modulate the perception of sweetness in contrast to the sourness induced by citric acid, were measured. Food neophobia, disgust sensitivity, sensitivity to reward and PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) responsiveness were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sensory-hedonic responses to the food models were found to vary across participants and allowed to identify different groups. Two clusters were established for the apple juice differing in liking for the coolest sample: Moderate and Extreme Coolness Dislikers. Instead, three clusters were identified for the chickpea cream: 1) Sweet Likers – perceiving sweet as less intense in all samples and showing liking increments with increasing sweetness and decreasing sourness; 2) Sweet Dislikers – tended to perceive higher sweetness intensity and liking raised with increasing sourness and decreasing sweetness; 3) Inverted U-Shaped – with an optimum liking corresponding to intermediate concentrations. Clusters' differences were found in age and in sensitivity to reward, with Sweet Likers being the youngest and the most sensitive to reward. The approach allowed identifying the level of sensory properties that minimized rejection and maximized liking within and across clusters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The two food models will be adopted to study the effect of cancer therapy on taste perception and liking responses, for the development of tailor-made products well accepted by patients experiencing taste alterations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 212-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266726852400055X/pdfft?md5=507282128294f5aa3b048548bdd18679&pid=1-s2.0-S266726852400055X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266726852400055X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

Adoption and maintenance of healthy diets among vulnerable populations, such as cancer patients, can be challenging. The preliminary study of sensory-hedonic responses through the modulation of key sensory properties in food models in healthy participants, could contribute to explore a new method to answer to nutrition in cancer's issue. Sensory and hedonic responses are affected, among other factors, by sensory responsiveness and psychological traits.

With the perspective of using the approach to investigate individual differences in sensory and hedonic responses in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy experiencing taste alterations, two food models were designed and pre-tested with healthy participants.

Methods

223 healthy participants (68% women, 18–70 y.o., 40 mean age; 118 from France and 105 from Italy) participated in the study. Sensory-hedonic responses to four apple juice samples, spiked with four increasing concentrations of mint syrup corresponding to variations in perceived coolness, and to four chickpea cream samples, spiked with glucose-fructose syrup to modulate the perception of sweetness in contrast to the sourness induced by citric acid, were measured. Food neophobia, disgust sensitivity, sensitivity to reward and PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) responsiveness were measured.

Results

Sensory-hedonic responses to the food models were found to vary across participants and allowed to identify different groups. Two clusters were established for the apple juice differing in liking for the coolest sample: Moderate and Extreme Coolness Dislikers. Instead, three clusters were identified for the chickpea cream: 1) Sweet Likers – perceiving sweet as less intense in all samples and showing liking increments with increasing sweetness and decreasing sourness; 2) Sweet Dislikers – tended to perceive higher sweetness intensity and liking raised with increasing sourness and decreasing sweetness; 3) Inverted U-Shaped – with an optimum liking corresponding to intermediate concentrations. Clusters' differences were found in age and in sensitivity to reward, with Sweet Likers being the youngest and the most sensitive to reward. The approach allowed identifying the level of sensory properties that minimized rejection and maximized liking within and across clusters.

Conclusions

The two food models will be adopted to study the effect of cancer therapy on taste perception and liking responses, for the development of tailor-made products well accepted by patients experiencing taste alterations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在食物模型中调节味觉和三叉神经感觉,以评估对食物的感觉和享乐反应的个体差异
背景& 目标在癌症患者等弱势人群中采用和保持健康饮食可能具有挑战性。通过调节健康参与者食物模型的关键感官特性,对感官-享乐反应进行初步研究,有助于探索一种新方法来解决癌症患者的营养问题。感官和享乐反应受感官反应能力和心理特征等因素的影响。为了利用这种方法研究正在接受化疗的癌症患者因味觉改变而产生的感官和享乐反应的个体差异,我们设计了两种食物模型,并在健康参与者中进行了预先测试。研究人员测量了对四种苹果汁样品和四种鹰嘴豆奶油样品的感官麻痹反应,前者添加了四种浓度递增的薄荷糖浆,以适应不同的凉爽感;后者添加了葡萄糖-果糖糖浆,以调节甜味感,与柠檬酸引起的酸味形成对比。结果发现,不同的参与者对食物模型的感觉-声调反应各不相同,因此可以确定不同的组别。对苹果汁的喜好不同,对最凉样品的喜好也不同:中度和极度不喜欢凉爽者。鹰嘴豆奶油则有三个群组:1)甜味喜欢者--在所有样品中甜味强度都较低,随着甜味的增加和酸味的减少,喜欢程度也随之增加;2)甜味厌恶者--倾向于认为甜味强度较高,随着酸味的增加和甜味的减少,喜欢程度也随之增加;3)倒 U 型--中间浓度对应最佳喜欢程度。在年龄和对奖赏的敏感度方面发现了群组差异,甜味喜欢者最年轻,对奖赏最敏感。结论 这两种食品模型将用于研究癌症治疗对味觉感知和喜好反应的影响,以开发出深受味觉改变患者欢迎的定制产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing conflict of interests/consent statements in previously published articles A six-month randomized controlled pilot study evaluating the effects of an oral nutrition supplement on children's growth patterns Risk factors of postoperative infections in patients with iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Adherence, tolerance, and patterns of use of an oral adapted texture nutritional formula in malnourished patients with dysphagia Continuum of Care - Building bridges between different phases of the patient's pathway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1