Transdiagnostic Psychological Interventions for Symptoms of Common Mental Disorders Delivered by Non-Specialist Providers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Depression and Anxiety Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1155/2024/5037662
Éanna Ó hAnrachtaigh, Gary Brown, Andrew Beck, Rebecca Conway, Hattie Jones, Ioannis Angelakis
{"title":"Transdiagnostic Psychological Interventions for Symptoms of Common Mental Disorders Delivered by Non-Specialist Providers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Éanna Ó hAnrachtaigh,&nbsp;Gary Brown,&nbsp;Andrew Beck,&nbsp;Rebecca Conway,&nbsp;Hattie Jones,&nbsp;Ioannis Angelakis","doi":"10.1155/2024/5037662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>There is a treatment gap for Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as non-specific psychological distress (NPD) in low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC), due to the lack of available clinicians and locally appropriate interventions. Task-shifting using non-specialist providers (NSP) and transdiagnostic approaches may address this. Transdiagnostic approaches can be effective at treating CMDs and NPD in high-income countries (HIC), but currently, there is no comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding their effectiveness in LAMICs. This review addressed this gap by examining the effectiveness of transdiagnostic psychological interventions for symptoms of CMDs and NPD delivered by NSPs in LAMICs. Three databases were searched (Embase, PsycInfo, and PubMed). Hedge’s <i>g</i>’s were calculated using random-effect models to correct for small sample bias. Twenty-one transdiagnostic interventions across 20 studies were included. Moderate reductions at posttreatment were found in psychological distress (g = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.81 to −0.46), symptoms of anxiety (g = −0.61; 95% CI: −0.80 to −0.42), depression (g = −0.59; 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.44), and PTSD/trauma (g = −0.38; 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.16), with significant small reductions maintained at follow-up ranging from 13 to 26 weeks for NPD (SMD = − 0.37; 95% CI: −0.57 to −0.17), anxiety (g = − 0.41; 95% CI: −0.91 to 0.09), depression (g = −0.38; 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.16), and trauma symptoms (g = −0.23; 95% CI: −0.42 to −0.05). These findings are important and suggest that transdiagnostic approaches delivered by NSPs are effective at treating symptoms of CMDs and NPD in LAMICs. Future research should consider comparing task-shifting approaches with disorder-specific interventions and explore the effectiveness of longer sessions across various mental health conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5037662","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5037662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a treatment gap for Common Mental Disorders (CMDs) such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as non-specific psychological distress (NPD) in low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC), due to the lack of available clinicians and locally appropriate interventions. Task-shifting using non-specialist providers (NSP) and transdiagnostic approaches may address this. Transdiagnostic approaches can be effective at treating CMDs and NPD in high-income countries (HIC), but currently, there is no comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding their effectiveness in LAMICs. This review addressed this gap by examining the effectiveness of transdiagnostic psychological interventions for symptoms of CMDs and NPD delivered by NSPs in LAMICs. Three databases were searched (Embase, PsycInfo, and PubMed). Hedge’s g’s were calculated using random-effect models to correct for small sample bias. Twenty-one transdiagnostic interventions across 20 studies were included. Moderate reductions at posttreatment were found in psychological distress (g = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.81 to −0.46), symptoms of anxiety (g = −0.61; 95% CI: −0.80 to −0.42), depression (g = −0.59; 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.44), and PTSD/trauma (g = −0.38; 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.16), with significant small reductions maintained at follow-up ranging from 13 to 26 weeks for NPD (SMD = − 0.37; 95% CI: −0.57 to −0.17), anxiety (g = − 0.41; 95% CI: −0.91 to 0.09), depression (g = −0.38; 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.16), and trauma symptoms (g = −0.23; 95% CI: −0.42 to −0.05). These findings are important and suggest that transdiagnostic approaches delivered by NSPs are effective at treating symptoms of CMDs and NPD in LAMICs. Future research should consider comparing task-shifting approaches with disorder-specific interventions and explore the effectiveness of longer sessions across various mental health conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中低收入国家非专科医生对常见精神障碍症状的跨诊断心理干预:系统回顾与元分析
在中低收入国家(LAMIC),焦虑症、抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等常见精神障碍(CMDs)以及非特异性心理困扰(NPD)的治疗存在缺口,原因是缺乏可用的临床医生和适合当地的干预措施。利用非专科医生提供者(NSP)和跨诊断方法进行任务转移可以解决这一问题。在高收入国家(HIC),跨诊断方法可以有效治疗慢性阻塞性肺病和非传染性肺病,但目前还没有关于这些方法在拉美和加勒比海地区的有效性的全面综合证据。本综述针对这一空白,研究了在拉美与加勒比海地区,由国家心理咨询师提供的跨诊断心理干预治疗慢性精神萎缩性疾病和非传染性精神疾病症状的有效性。我们检索了三个数据库(Embase、PsycInfo 和 PubMed)。使用随机效应模型计算赫氏 g 值,以纠正小样本偏差。共纳入了 20 项研究中的 21 项跨诊断干预措施。研究发现,治疗后心理压力(g = -0.64;95% CI:-0.81 至 -0.46)、焦虑症状(g = -0.61;95% CI:-0.80 至 -0.42)、抑郁(g = -0.59;95% CI:-0.75 至 -0.44)和创伤后应激障碍/创伤(g = -0.38;95% CI:-0.59 至 -0.16)均有适度减轻。16),在 13 至 26 周的随访中,NPD(SMD = - 0.37;95% CI:-0.57 至 -0.17)、焦虑(g = - 0.41;95% CI:-0.91 至 0.09)、抑郁(g = -0.38;95% CI:-0.59 至 -0.16)和创伤症状(g = -0.23;95% CI:-0.42 至 -0.05)均有明显的小幅下降。这些发现非常重要,表明非营利组织提供的跨诊断方法能够有效治疗 LAMICs 中的 CMD 和 NPD 症状。未来的研究应考虑将任务转移法与针对特定疾病的干预措施进行比较,并探讨在各种精神健康状况下延长疗程的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional–Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer Associations of Changes in Alcohol Consumption on the Risk of Depression/Suicide Among Initial Nondrinkers Effectiveness of a Saffron and Withania Supplement on Mood in Women With Mild-to-Moderate Anxiety During the COVID-19 Lockdown Correlation Between Anxiety and Serum Thyroid Hormone Levels in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Undergoing Microwave Ablation The Bridge Symptoms of Work–Family Conflict, Sleep Disorder, and Job Burnout: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1