Car energy efficiency and emissions in the built environment

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10491-8
Chris Djie ten Dam, Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke, Dick Ettema, Gert Jan Kramer, Vinzenz Koning
{"title":"Car energy efficiency and emissions in the built environment","authors":"Chris Djie ten Dam, Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke, Dick Ettema, Gert Jan Kramer, Vinzenz Koning","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10491-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To mitigate climate change and safeguard energy security, it is necessary to limit car dependence, reduce car weights, and shift to alternative car powertrains. This study therefore looked into the real-world specific energy consumption and <span>\\(\\hbox {CO}_{{2}}\\)</span> emissions of cars in the Netherlands. Next, it analyzed how sociodemographic and built environment variables influence energy-relevant car type choices with a multilevel discrete choice modeling framework. At a first stage, this framework considered the number of cars owned. Conditional on that decision, it simultaneously considered choices between different car fuel types and weight categories. The results showed that small, lower-income households with few male or older members in non-green (urban) environments were more likely to own light (efficient) vehicles. Remote households had a preference for light and diesel vehicles. In contrast, households with private parking tended to own heavy and electric vehicles. Finally, owning multiple cars was correlated with both non-urban living and heavy car preferences. The combined effect was a mild preference for energy efficient vehicles in urban areas. Previous studies that omitted vehicle energy efficiency thus slightly underestimated urban planning’s environmental impact. However, our results indicate that the built environment has a greater effect on travel energy use through the number of cars owned than through car specific energy consumption. The bias in the official vehicle energy data was also much larger than the total influence of the built environment on car specific energy consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10491-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate climate change and safeguard energy security, it is necessary to limit car dependence, reduce car weights, and shift to alternative car powertrains. This study therefore looked into the real-world specific energy consumption and \(\hbox {CO}_{{2}}\) emissions of cars in the Netherlands. Next, it analyzed how sociodemographic and built environment variables influence energy-relevant car type choices with a multilevel discrete choice modeling framework. At a first stage, this framework considered the number of cars owned. Conditional on that decision, it simultaneously considered choices between different car fuel types and weight categories. The results showed that small, lower-income households with few male or older members in non-green (urban) environments were more likely to own light (efficient) vehicles. Remote households had a preference for light and diesel vehicles. In contrast, households with private parking tended to own heavy and electric vehicles. Finally, owning multiple cars was correlated with both non-urban living and heavy car preferences. The combined effect was a mild preference for energy efficient vehicles in urban areas. Previous studies that omitted vehicle energy efficiency thus slightly underestimated urban planning’s environmental impact. However, our results indicate that the built environment has a greater effect on travel energy use through the number of cars owned than through car specific energy consumption. The bias in the official vehicle energy data was also much larger than the total influence of the built environment on car specific energy consumption.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑环境中的汽车能效和排放
为了减缓气候变化和保障能源安全,有必要限制对汽车的依赖,减轻汽车重量,并转向替代性汽车动力系统。因此,本研究调查了荷兰汽车在现实世界中的具体能耗和(\hbox {CO}_{2}}\)排放量。接下来,研究采用多层次离散选择建模框架,分析了社会人口和建筑环境变量如何影响与能源相关的汽车类型选择。在第一阶段,该框架考虑了拥有汽车的数量。以这一决定为条件,它同时考虑了不同汽车燃料类型和重量类别之间的选择。结果显示,在非绿色(城市)环境中,男性或老年成员较少的低收入小家庭更有可能拥有轻型(高效)汽车。偏远地区的家庭则偏好轻型车和柴油车。相比之下,有私人停车场的家庭倾向于拥有重型车和电动车。最后,拥有多辆汽车与非城市生活和重型汽车偏好相关。综合来看,城市地区对节能汽车的偏好程度较低。因此,以往忽略车辆能效的研究略微低估了城市规划对环境的影响。然而,我们的研究结果表明,建筑环境通过汽车保有量对出行能耗的影响比通过汽车具体能耗对出行能耗的影响更大。官方汽车能耗数据的偏差也远远大于建筑环境对汽车具体能耗的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Spatial–temporal multi-task learning for short-term passenger inflow and outflow prediction on holidays in urban rail transit systems Comparing structural policies for relieving citywide traffic congestion: longitudinal evidence from 96 Chinese cities Identifying instant utility using psychophysiological indicators in a transport experiment with ecological validity Research on charging patterns of electric taxis based on high-dimensional cluster analysis: a case study of Hangzhou, China A panel analysis of change in personal air travel behaviour in England between 2012 and 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1