Homogeneous selection and stochasticity overrule heterogeneous selection across biotic taxa and ecosystems

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oikos Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1111/oik.10517
Janne Soininen, Caio Graco‐Roza
{"title":"Homogeneous selection and stochasticity overrule heterogeneous selection across biotic taxa and ecosystems","authors":"Janne Soininen, Caio Graco‐Roza","doi":"10.1111/oik.10517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deterministic factors including homogeneous and heterogeneous selection and stochastic factors jointly shape ecological communities. However, a quantitative synthesis of the factors underlying the balance among different assembly processes is lacking. Here, we synthesized data from 149 datasets covering major biotic groups and ecosystem types globally. We used a null model approach based on Raup–Crick dissimilarities and Bayesian meta‐regression to analyze the data. We found that communities were more under homogeneous selection than heterogeneous selection across biotic taxa and ecosystems. Environment selected species homogeneously more often at small scales while heterogeneously more often at large scales. Stochasticity also showed scale‐dependence as stochastic community assembly increased with study scale. Homogeneous and heterogeneous selection were strongest at high latitudes while stochastic factors were strongest in tropics. Marine systems had the highest degree of homogeneous selection and the lowest stochasticity. We provide the first analysis of community assembly across taxa and ecosystems which should be important for a better understanding of how communities respond to environmental change.","PeriodicalId":19496,"journal":{"name":"Oikos","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oikos","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deterministic factors including homogeneous and heterogeneous selection and stochastic factors jointly shape ecological communities. However, a quantitative synthesis of the factors underlying the balance among different assembly processes is lacking. Here, we synthesized data from 149 datasets covering major biotic groups and ecosystem types globally. We used a null model approach based on Raup–Crick dissimilarities and Bayesian meta‐regression to analyze the data. We found that communities were more under homogeneous selection than heterogeneous selection across biotic taxa and ecosystems. Environment selected species homogeneously more often at small scales while heterogeneously more often at large scales. Stochasticity also showed scale‐dependence as stochastic community assembly increased with study scale. Homogeneous and heterogeneous selection were strongest at high latitudes while stochastic factors were strongest in tropics. Marine systems had the highest degree of homogeneous selection and the lowest stochasticity. We provide the first analysis of community assembly across taxa and ecosystems which should be important for a better understanding of how communities respond to environmental change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物分类群和生态系统中的同质选择和随机性压倒了异质选择
包括同质和异质选择在内的决定性因素和随机因素共同塑造了生态群落。然而,目前还缺乏对不同组合过程之间的平衡因素的定量综合研究。在此,我们综合了来自 149 个数据集的数据,涵盖了全球主要生物类群和生态系统类型。我们采用基于 Raup-Crick 差异性和贝叶斯元回归的无效模型方法来分析数据。我们发现,在不同的生物类群和生态系统中,群落的同质选择多于异质选择。在小尺度上,环境对物种的同质选择更多,而在大尺度上,环境对物种的异质选择更多。随机性也表现出尺度依赖性,因为随机群落组合随着研究尺度的增加而增加。高纬度地区的同质和异质选择最强,而热带地区的随机因素最强。海洋系统的同质选择程度最高,随机性最低。我们首次对不同类群和生态系统的群落组合进行了分析,这对于更好地理解群落如何应对环境变化非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oikos
Oikos 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
152
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Oikos publishes original and innovative research on all aspects of ecology, defined as organism-environment interactions at various spatiotemporal scales, so including macroecology and evolutionary ecology. Emphasis is on theoretical and empirical work aimed at generalization and synthesis across taxa, systems and ecological disciplines. Papers can contribute to new developments in ecology by reporting novel theory or critical empirical results, and "synthesis" can include developing new theory, tests of general hypotheses, or bringing together established or emerging areas of ecology. Confirming or extending the established literature, by for example showing results that are novel for a new taxon, or purely applied research, is given low priority.
期刊最新文献
Linking fine‐root diameter across root orders with climatic, biological and edaphic factors in the Northern Hemisphere Do plants respond to multi‐year disturbance rhythms and are we missing the beat? Importance of accounting for imperfect detection of plants in the estimation of population growth rates Landscape structures and stand attributes jointly regulate forest productivity Evolutionary cycles in a model of nestmate recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1