Pilot epinephrine dose-finding study to counter epidural-related blood pressure reduction

Olga C Nin, Andre Boezaart, Christopher Giordano, Steven J Hughes, Hari K Parvataneni, Miguel A Reina, Abigail Schirmer, Terrie Vasilopoulos
{"title":"Pilot epinephrine dose-finding study to counter epidural-related blood pressure reduction","authors":"Olga C Nin, Andre Boezaart, Christopher Giordano, Steven J Hughes, Hari K Parvataneni, Miguel A Reina, Abigail Schirmer, Terrie Vasilopoulos","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective An unwanted side effect associated with epidural analgesia is the reduction in blood pressure (BP) due to the sympathetic blockade. This study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of adding different epinephrine concentrations to epidurally injected local anesthetic solution to counteract sympathectomy. We hypothesized that epinephrine could mitigate the decrease in BP possibly caused by the local anesthetic, specifically decreasing the incidence of hypotension. Methods Sixty-six patients were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, quadruple-blinded prospective study into three groups: epidural ropivacaine 0.2% without epinephrine (control) or with 2 µg/mL or 5 µg/mL epinephrine. Our primary outcome was the assessment of differences in hypotension between groups, defined as a >20% decrease in hypotension from baseline to the end of the intraoperative period. Results Forty-seven patients completed the study, and 19 were withdrawn. Fifteen patients were in the control group, while 16 patients received 0.2% ropivacaine +2 µg/mL epinephrine, and 16 received 0.2% ropivacaine +5 µg/mL epinephrine. The overall rate of hypotension was 21.3% (10/47). There were no statistically significant differences in hypotension rates between the control group (33%) and groups receiving either +2 µg/mL (13%, p=0.165) or +5 µg/mL (19%, p=0.353) of epinephrine. In secondary analyses, respiratory rate showed greater decreases in control groups across the perioperative period compared with treatment groups (p=0.016) Conclusion Adding epinephrine to the epidural local anesthetic did not significantly decrease the rate of hypotension. However, epinephrine mitigated decreases in respiratory rate across the perioperative period. Future studies will focus on increasing group size and higher epinephrine concentrations (10 µg/mL). Trial registration number [NCT02722746][1]. No data are available. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02722746&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F07%2F11%2Frapm-2024-105406.atom","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective An unwanted side effect associated with epidural analgesia is the reduction in blood pressure (BP) due to the sympathetic blockade. This study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of adding different epinephrine concentrations to epidurally injected local anesthetic solution to counteract sympathectomy. We hypothesized that epinephrine could mitigate the decrease in BP possibly caused by the local anesthetic, specifically decreasing the incidence of hypotension. Methods Sixty-six patients were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, quadruple-blinded prospective study into three groups: epidural ropivacaine 0.2% without epinephrine (control) or with 2 µg/mL or 5 µg/mL epinephrine. Our primary outcome was the assessment of differences in hypotension between groups, defined as a >20% decrease in hypotension from baseline to the end of the intraoperative period. Results Forty-seven patients completed the study, and 19 were withdrawn. Fifteen patients were in the control group, while 16 patients received 0.2% ropivacaine +2 µg/mL epinephrine, and 16 received 0.2% ropivacaine +5 µg/mL epinephrine. The overall rate of hypotension was 21.3% (10/47). There were no statistically significant differences in hypotension rates between the control group (33%) and groups receiving either +2 µg/mL (13%, p=0.165) or +5 µg/mL (19%, p=0.353) of epinephrine. In secondary analyses, respiratory rate showed greater decreases in control groups across the perioperative period compared with treatment groups (p=0.016) Conclusion Adding epinephrine to the epidural local anesthetic did not significantly decrease the rate of hypotension. However, epinephrine mitigated decreases in respiratory rate across the perioperative period. Future studies will focus on increasing group size and higher epinephrine concentrations (10 µg/mL). Trial registration number [NCT02722746][1]. No data are available. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02722746&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F07%2F11%2Frapm-2024-105406.atom
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗硬膜外相关血压降低的肾上腺素剂量探索试验研究
目的 硬膜外镇痛的一个不良副作用是交感神经阻断导致的血压(BP)下降。本研究评估了在硬膜外注射局麻药溶液中加入不同浓度的肾上腺素以对抗交感神经切除术对血液动力学的影响。我们假设肾上腺素可减轻局麻药可能导致的血压下降,特别是降低低血压的发生率。方法 在一项随机、对照、四重盲法前瞻性研究中,66 名患者被分为三组:硬膜外罗哌卡因 0.2% 不含肾上腺素组(对照组)或含 2 µg/mL 或 5 µg/mL 肾上腺素组。我们的主要结果是评估组间低血压的差异,即从基线到术中结束时低血压下降>20%。结果 47名患者完成了研究,19名患者退出。15 名患者为对照组,16 名患者接受了 0.2% 罗哌卡因 +2 µg/mL 肾上腺素治疗,16 名患者接受了 0.2% 罗哌卡因 +5 µg/mL 肾上腺素治疗。低血压总发生率为 21.3%(10/47)。对照组(33%)与接受+2 µg/mL(13%,p=0.165)或+5 µg/mL(19%,p=0.353)肾上腺素的组别之间的低血压率差异无统计学意义。结论 在硬膜外局麻药中加入肾上腺素并不能显著降低低血压发生率。不过,肾上腺素可减轻围手术期呼吸频率的下降。未来的研究将侧重于扩大研究组规模和提高肾上腺素浓度(10 µg/mL)。试验注册号[NCT02722746][1]。无数据。[1]:/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02722746&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F07%2F11%2Frapm-2024-105406.atom
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1