Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with lupus in China: RELIABLE observational cohort study protocol.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lupus Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1136/lupus-2024-001144
Liya Fan, Zhiliu Tang, Xin He, Xintong He, Zhuoli Zhang, Patricia Juliao
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with lupus in China: RELIABLE observational cohort study protocol.","authors":"Liya Fan, Zhiliu Tang, Xin He, Xintong He, Zhuoli Zhang, Patricia Juliao","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy of belimumab in SLE has been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials, and its real-world effectiveness has been shown in studies in several countries. While belimumab was approved for treating SLE in China in 2019, data on its benefit in clinical practice are limited. This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in China, using practical clinical measures, such as Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), to add to the body of real-world evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The Real-world Effectiveness of beLImumAB in patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China (RELIABLE) is an ambidirectional, observational descriptive cohort study across approximately 15 centres in China. Adults with SLE newly initiating belimumab with ≥1 measure of all five LLDAS components (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000; no new lupus disease activity; Physician Global Assessment; prednisolone-equivalent dose; immunosuppressants/biologics use) in the 3 months preceding belimumab initiation (index date) will be eligible and retrospectively and/or prospectively enrolled, depending on data availability. The retrospective follow-up will be ≤6 months, and retrospective and prospective patients will have a maximum 24-month follow-up. The primary objectives will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS at 12 and 24 months post-index. The key secondary objective will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS and each component at 3, 6, 9 and 18 months post-index. All data will be analysed descriptively; a statistical estimand will be applied to account for intercurrent events expected in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study will comply with all applicable laws regarding patient privacy; institutional review board approval will be obtained before the study commencement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in patients with SLE initiating belimumab in clinical practice in China. Using LLDAS will provide clinicians with valuable insights into the impact of belimumab on the treat-to-target strategy with a relevant measure that can be repeated across the clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11243130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of belimumab in SLE has been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials, and its real-world effectiveness has been shown in studies in several countries. While belimumab was approved for treating SLE in China in 2019, data on its benefit in clinical practice are limited. This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in China, using practical clinical measures, such as Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), to add to the body of real-world evidence.

Methods and analysis: The Real-world Effectiveness of beLImumAB in patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China (RELIABLE) is an ambidirectional, observational descriptive cohort study across approximately 15 centres in China. Adults with SLE newly initiating belimumab with ≥1 measure of all five LLDAS components (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000; no new lupus disease activity; Physician Global Assessment; prednisolone-equivalent dose; immunosuppressants/biologics use) in the 3 months preceding belimumab initiation (index date) will be eligible and retrospectively and/or prospectively enrolled, depending on data availability. The retrospective follow-up will be ≤6 months, and retrospective and prospective patients will have a maximum 24-month follow-up. The primary objectives will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS at 12 and 24 months post-index. The key secondary objective will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS and each component at 3, 6, 9 and 18 months post-index. All data will be analysed descriptively; a statistical estimand will be applied to account for intercurrent events expected in a real-world setting.

Ethics and dissemination: This study will comply with all applicable laws regarding patient privacy; institutional review board approval will be obtained before the study commencement.

Conclusions: This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in patients with SLE initiating belimumab in clinical practice in China. Using LLDAS will provide clinicians with valuable insights into the impact of belimumab on the treat-to-target strategy with a relevant measure that can be repeated across the clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝利木单抗在中国狼疮患者中的实际疗效:RELIABLE观察性队列研究方案。
简介:贝利木单抗治疗系统性红斑狼疮的疗效已在随机临床试验中得到证实,其实际疗效也已在多个国家的研究中得到证实。虽然中国已于2019年批准贝利木单抗用于治疗系统性红斑狼疮,但有关其在临床实践中疗效的数据却十分有限。本研究将采用红斑狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)等实用临床指标,评估贝利木单抗在中国的疗效,以补充真实世界的证据:中国系统性红斑狼疮患者使用贝利莫司的真实世界疗效研究(RELIABLE)是一项跨中国约15个中心的双向观察性描述性队列研究。新近开始使用贝利木单抗的成人系统性红斑狼疮患者,如果在开始使用贝利木单抗前3个月(指标日期)的所有5项LLDAS指标(系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数-2000;无新的狼疮疾病活动;医生总体评估;泼尼松龙当量剂量;免疫抑制剂/生物制剂使用)中有≥1项指标符合条件,将根据数据可用性进行回顾性和/或前瞻性入组。回顾性随访时间≤6个月,回顾性和前瞻性患者的随访时间最长为24个月。主要目标是描述在指标发布后 12 个月和 24 个月达到 LLDAS 的患者比例。主要次要目标是描述在指标发布后 3、6、9 和 18 个月达到 LLDAS 及各组成部分要求的患者比例。将对所有数据进行描述性分析;将采用统计估算,以考虑真实世界环境中的预期并发症:本研究将遵守有关患者隐私的所有适用法律;研究开始前将获得机构审查委员会的批准:本研究将评估在中国临床实践中开始使用贝利木单抗的系统性红斑狼疮患者的贝利木单抗疗效。使用LLDAS将为临床医生提供有价值的见解,让他们了解贝利木单抗对 "靶向治疗 "策略的影响,并提供可在临床实践中重复使用的相关指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. Using photovoice to investigate patient experiences of lupus nephritis in Canada. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcome in patients with SLE: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving routine mental health screening for depression and anxiety in a paediatric lupus clinic: a quality improvement initiative for enhanced mental healthcare. Validating claims-based algorithms for a systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis in Medicare data for informed use of the Lupus Index: a tool for geospatial research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1