Variable Duration Trial as an Alternative Design for Continuous Endpoints.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutical Statistics Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1002/pst.2418
Jitendra Ganju, Julie Guoguang Ma
{"title":"Variable Duration Trial as an Alternative Design for Continuous Endpoints.","authors":"Jitendra Ganju, Julie Guoguang Ma","doi":"10.1002/pst.2418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials with continuous primary endpoints typically measure outcomes at baseline, at a fixed timepoint (denoted T<sub>min</sub>), and at intermediate timepoints. The analysis is commonly performed using the mixed model repeated measures method. It is sometimes expected that the effect size will be larger with follow-up longer than T<sub>min</sub>. But extending the follow-up for all patients delays trial completion. We propose an alternative trial design and analysis method that potentially increases statistical power without extending the trial duration or increasing the sample size. We propose following the last enrolled patient until T<sub>min</sub>, with earlier enrollees having variable follow-up durations up to a maximum of T<sub>max</sub>. The sample size at T<sub>max</sub> will be smaller than at T<sub>min</sub>, and due to staggered enrollment, data missing at T<sub>max</sub> will be missing completely at random. For analysis, we propose an alpha-adjusted procedure based on the smaller of the p values at T<sub>min</sub> and T<sub>max</sub>, termed <math> <semantics><mrow><mtext>minP</mtext></mrow> <annotation>$$ minP $$</annotation></semantics> </math> . This approach can provide the highest power when the powers at T<sub>min</sub> and T<sub>max</sub> are similar. If the power at T<sub>min</sub> and T<sub>max</sub> differ significantly, the power of <math> <semantics><mrow><mtext>minP</mtext></mrow> <annotation>$$ minP $$</annotation></semantics> </math> is modestly reduced compared with the larger of the two powers. Rare disease trials, due to the limited size of the patient population, may benefit the most with this design.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials with continuous primary endpoints typically measure outcomes at baseline, at a fixed timepoint (denoted Tmin), and at intermediate timepoints. The analysis is commonly performed using the mixed model repeated measures method. It is sometimes expected that the effect size will be larger with follow-up longer than Tmin. But extending the follow-up for all patients delays trial completion. We propose an alternative trial design and analysis method that potentially increases statistical power without extending the trial duration or increasing the sample size. We propose following the last enrolled patient until Tmin, with earlier enrollees having variable follow-up durations up to a maximum of Tmax. The sample size at Tmax will be smaller than at Tmin, and due to staggered enrollment, data missing at Tmax will be missing completely at random. For analysis, we propose an alpha-adjusted procedure based on the smaller of the p values at Tmin and Tmax, termed minP $$ minP $$ . This approach can provide the highest power when the powers at Tmin and Tmax are similar. If the power at Tmin and Tmax differ significantly, the power of minP $$ minP $$ is modestly reduced compared with the larger of the two powers. Rare disease trials, due to the limited size of the patient population, may benefit the most with this design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可变持续时间试验作为连续终点的替代设计
具有连续性主要终点的临床试验通常在基线、固定时间点(Tmin)和中间时间点测量结果。分析通常采用混合模型重复测量法。有时,人们会期望随访时间长于 Tmin 时的效应大小会更大。但延长所有患者的随访时间会延误试验的完成。我们提出了另一种试验设计和分析方法,这种方法有可能在不延长试验时间或增加样本量的情况下提高统计能力。我们建议对最后一名入组患者进行随访,直至 Tmin,而对较早入组患者的随访时间则不固定,直至最大随访时间 Tmax。Tmax时的样本量将小于Tmin时的样本量,而且由于交错入组,Tmax时缺失的数据将完全随机缺失。在分析时,我们建议采用基于 Tmin 和 Tmax 时 p 值中较小者的阿尔法调整程序,称为 minP $$ minP $$。当 Tmin 和 Tmax 的功率相近时,这种方法可提供最高的功率。如果 Tmin 和 Tmax 时的功率相差很大,则 minP $$ minP $$ 的功率会比两个功率中较大的功率略低。罕见病试验由于患者人数有限,采用这种设计可能会受益最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian Solutions for Assessing Differential Effects in Biomarker Positive and Negative Subgroups. Pre-Posterior Distributions in Drug Development and Their Properties. Beyond the Fragility Index. A Model-Based Trial Design With a Randomization Scheme Considering Pharmacokinetics Exposure for Dose Optimization in Oncology. Potential Bias Models With Bayesian Shrinkage Priors for Dynamic Borrowing of Multiple Historical Control Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1