Establishing a surveillance programme for Salmonella Dublin in Austrian dairy herds by comparing herd-level vs. individual animal detection methods

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Preventive veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106277
Kerstin Hofer , Barbara Trockenbacher , Eva Sodoma , Johannes L. Khol , Michael Dünser , Thomas Wittek
{"title":"Establishing a surveillance programme for Salmonella Dublin in Austrian dairy herds by comparing herd-level vs. individual animal detection methods","authors":"Kerstin Hofer ,&nbsp;Barbara Trockenbacher ,&nbsp;Eva Sodoma ,&nbsp;Johannes L. Khol ,&nbsp;Michael Dünser ,&nbsp;Thomas Wittek","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to its increasing occurrence in cattle farms in various countries, leading to significant economic losses in affected livestock, <em>Salmonella enterica</em> subspecies <em>enterica</em> serovar Dublin (<em>S</em>. Dublin) has become a highly investigated pathogen in cattle production. In Austria, there have been occasional human cases of <em>S</em>. Dublin as well as an increase in laboratory-confirmed cases in cattle, indicating the need for a screening programme to determine the current status in Austria. The aims of this study were, firstly, to determine the seroprevalence of <em>S</em>. Dublin in dairy herds through bulk milk screenings in two federal states (Salzburg, Tyrol) of Austria. Secondly, the study aimed to identify the infection status of the herds through individual animal and herd level detection, comparing microbiological, molecular and serological detection methods. The results of the study will allow the development of a sampling strategy for a surveillance programme in Austria.</p><p>A total of 6973 dairy farms were tested through serological bulk milk screening. The seroprevalence for the federal state of Tyrol was 14.8 % and for Salzburg it was 18.2 %, resulting in an average seroprevalence of 16.5 %. At an individual animal level, 205 (11.3 %) animals tested positive for shedding of <em>S</em>. Dublin in the faeces through microbiological detection, and 268 (17.0 %) animals had positive values (ct value ≤ 38) by qPCR. The association between microbiological and molecular detection was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001), with a calculated kappa value of 0.65 ± 0.27 (p ≤ 0.001), assuming a substantial level of agreement. In 17 herds, where an individual animal tested positive for shedding of <em>S</em>. Dublin, environmental sampling and testing were carried out. At a herd level 16 (94.1 %) out of the 17 participating herds, tested positive for <em>S</em>. Dublin either microbiologically or by molecular assay in boot swab samples. Bulk milk samples from 14 out of the 17 participating herds were analysed for antibodies to <em>S</em>. Dublin and 12 samples (85.7 %) were positive. In total 111 (18.9 %) out of 587 blood samples tested positive for <em>S</em>. Dublin antibodies, demonstrating a statistically significant correlation (p &lt; 0.001) both with microbiological (κ = 0.32 ± 0.49; p ≤ 0.001) and molecular (κ=0.23 ± 0.06; p ≤ 0.001) findings.</p><p>It was possible to identify <em>S</em>. Dublin by culture from boot swabs in 14 (82.4 %) out of 17 herds and by molecular assay using qPCR in 15 (88.2 %) out of 17 herds, indicating a suitable sample type for screening on a herd level-basis for acute infections, but not for identifying chronic infections or asymptomatic carriers. Other environmental samples, such as sponge-sticks, are only suitable to a limited extent for the detection of <em>S</em>. Dublin. The results of this study demonstrate a moderate <em>S</em>. Dublin prevalence in dairy herds in the selected Austrian regions, signalling further screening and management programmes for the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 106277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587724001636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to its increasing occurrence in cattle farms in various countries, leading to significant economic losses in affected livestock, Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin) has become a highly investigated pathogen in cattle production. In Austria, there have been occasional human cases of S. Dublin as well as an increase in laboratory-confirmed cases in cattle, indicating the need for a screening programme to determine the current status in Austria. The aims of this study were, firstly, to determine the seroprevalence of S. Dublin in dairy herds through bulk milk screenings in two federal states (Salzburg, Tyrol) of Austria. Secondly, the study aimed to identify the infection status of the herds through individual animal and herd level detection, comparing microbiological, molecular and serological detection methods. The results of the study will allow the development of a sampling strategy for a surveillance programme in Austria.

A total of 6973 dairy farms were tested through serological bulk milk screening. The seroprevalence for the federal state of Tyrol was 14.8 % and for Salzburg it was 18.2 %, resulting in an average seroprevalence of 16.5 %. At an individual animal level, 205 (11.3 %) animals tested positive for shedding of S. Dublin in the faeces through microbiological detection, and 268 (17.0 %) animals had positive values (ct value ≤ 38) by qPCR. The association between microbiological and molecular detection was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with a calculated kappa value of 0.65 ± 0.27 (p ≤ 0.001), assuming a substantial level of agreement. In 17 herds, where an individual animal tested positive for shedding of S. Dublin, environmental sampling and testing were carried out. At a herd level 16 (94.1 %) out of the 17 participating herds, tested positive for S. Dublin either microbiologically or by molecular assay in boot swab samples. Bulk milk samples from 14 out of the 17 participating herds were analysed for antibodies to S. Dublin and 12 samples (85.7 %) were positive. In total 111 (18.9 %) out of 587 blood samples tested positive for S. Dublin antibodies, demonstrating a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) both with microbiological (κ = 0.32 ± 0.49; p ≤ 0.001) and molecular (κ=0.23 ± 0.06; p ≤ 0.001) findings.

It was possible to identify S. Dublin by culture from boot swabs in 14 (82.4 %) out of 17 herds and by molecular assay using qPCR in 15 (88.2 %) out of 17 herds, indicating a suitable sample type for screening on a herd level-basis for acute infections, but not for identifying chronic infections or asymptomatic carriers. Other environmental samples, such as sponge-sticks, are only suitable to a limited extent for the detection of S. Dublin. The results of this study demonstrate a moderate S. Dublin prevalence in dairy herds in the selected Austrian regions, signalling further screening and management programmes for the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过比较牛群与单个动物的检测方法,建立奥地利奶牛场都柏林沙门氏菌监测计划。
由于都柏林沙门氏菌(S. Dublin)在各国养牛场的发病率越来越高,给受影响的牲畜造成了巨大的经济损失,因此它已成为养牛生产中一个受到高度关注的病原体。在奥地利,人感染都柏林沙门氏菌的病例时有发生,实验室确诊的牛感染病例也在增加,这表明有必要开展一项筛查计划,以确定奥地利的现状。本研究的目的首先是通过对奥地利两个联邦州(萨尔茨堡州和蒂罗尔州)的散装牛奶进行筛查,确定都柏林氏嗜血杆菌在奶牛群中的血清流行率。其次,该研究旨在通过对微生物、分子和血清学检测方法的比较,对动物个体和牛群进行检测,从而确定牛群的感染状况。研究结果将有助于为奥地利的监测计划制定采样策略。通过血清学散装牛奶筛查,共对 6973 个奶牛场进行了检测。联邦蒂罗尔州的血清阳性率为 14.8%,萨尔茨堡州为 18.2%,平均血清阳性率为 16.5%。在动物个体层面,通过微生物检测,有 205 头(11.3%)动物的粪便中都柏林痢疾杆菌脱落呈阳性,通过 qPCR 检测,有 268 头(17.0%)动物的粪便中都柏林痢疾杆菌脱落呈阳性(ct 值 ≤ 38)。微生物检测和分子检测之间的关联具有显著的统计学意义(p < 0.001),计算得出的卡帕值为 0.65 ± 0.27(p ≤ 0.001),假定两者之间存在很大的一致性。在 17 个畜群中,如果个别动物的都柏林沙门氏菌脱落检测呈阳性,则进行环境采样和检测。在 17 个参与检测的牛群中,有 16 个牛群(94.1 %)的后备箱拭子样本经微生物检测或分子检测后都柏林氏菌呈阳性。对 17 个参试牧场中 14 个牧场的散装牛奶样本进行了都柏林沙门氏菌抗体分析,其中 12 个样本(85.7 %)呈阳性。在 587 份血液样本中,共有 111 份(18.9 %)样本的都柏林猪抗体检测呈阳性,与微生物学(κ = 0.32 ± 0.49;p ≤ 0.001)和分子检测(κ=0.23 ± 0.06;p ≤ 0.001)结果均有显著的统计学相关性(p < 0.001)。在 17 个畜群中,有 14 个(82.4%)畜群可以通过鞋拭子培养鉴定都柏林沙门氏菌,在 17 个畜群中,有 15 个(88.2%)畜群可以通过 qPCR 分子检测鉴定都柏林沙门氏菌。其他环境样本,如海绵棒,仅在一定程度上适用于检测都柏林沙门氏菌。这项研究结果表明,在选定的奥地利地区,都柏林沙门氏菌在奶牛群中的流行程度适中,这预示着未来将有进一步的筛查和管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
期刊最新文献
A dynamic framework for calculating the biomass of fattening pigs with an application in estimating the burden of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in the Netherlands Lifetime health care costs for dogs based on data from seven veterinary clinics in Denmark The global prevalence of microsporidia infection in rabbits as a neglected public health concern: A systematic review and meta-analysis Operational lessons learned from simulating an elimination response to a transboundary animal disease in wild animals Economic assessment of animal disease burden in Senegalese small ruminants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1