[Value of modified ROX index in predicting the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy].

Xueting Wang, Zhiming Zhang, Wen Cao
{"title":"[Value of modified ROX index in predicting the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy].","authors":"Xueting Wang, Zhiming Zhang, Wen Cao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240228-00171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the value of the modified ROX (mROX) index in predicting the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted, including 57 patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection who required HFNC treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Lanzhou University Second Hospital from December 2022 to June 2023. The patients were divided into HFNC failure group and HFNC success group according to whether they were successfully weaned from HFNC. Laboratory tests, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) in the first 24 hours of ICU admission were recorded in both groups, vital signs and arterial blood gas analysis immediately and after 6 hours of HFNC treatment, treatment regimen, length of ICU stay, and total length of hospital stay were recorded in both groups, and patients' outcomes at 28 days and 90 days were followed up by telephone. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the above indexes, and the significant indexes were included in the binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis to analyze the influencing factors of HFNC failure in patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to analyze the 28-day and 90-day outcomes of patients in both groups. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to analyze the value of treatment 6-hour mROX index and 6-hour ROX index in predicting the success of HFNC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 patients with ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled, including 34 patients in the HFNC success group and 23 patients in the HFNC failure group. Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactic acid (Lac) and the proportion of vasopressors, the proportion of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the APACHE II score and the SOFA score, the respiratory rate (RR) immediately and 6 hours after treatment were significantly higher in the HFNC failure group compared with the HFNC success group. The length of ICU stay was significantly longer, and oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) at the time of treatment, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), ROX index, and mROX index at the time of treatment and at 6 hours after treatment were significantly lower in the HFNC failure group compared with the HFNC success group (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the 28-day cumulative survival rates (100% vs. 26.1%) and 90-day cumulative survival rates (85.3% vs. 21.7%) of patients in the HFNC success group were significantly higher than those in the HFNC failure group (both P < 0.001). On binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis, Lac [odds ratio (OR) = 0.129, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.020-0.824], SOFA score (OR = 0.382, 95%CI was 0.158-0.925), 6-hour ROX index (OR = 0.099, 95%CI was 0.011-0.920), and 6-hour mROX index (OR = 23.703, 95%CI was 1.415-396.947) were associated with HFNC treatment outcome (all P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the 6-hour mROX index and the 6-hour ROX index for predicting the success of HFNC were both higher (0.809 and 0.714, respectively), and the AUC of 6-hour mROX index was significantly higher than that of 6-hour ROX index (P < 0.01), and the sensitivity was 88.2% and the specificity was 52.2% when the cut-off value of 6-hour mROX index was 4.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive value of the 6-hour mROX index in the treatment of patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher than that of the 6-hour ROX index, and the 6-hour mROX index is greater than 4.5, which is more likely to predict the success of HFNC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240228-00171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of the modified ROX (mROX) index in predicting the outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC).

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including 57 patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection who required HFNC treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Lanzhou University Second Hospital from December 2022 to June 2023. The patients were divided into HFNC failure group and HFNC success group according to whether they were successfully weaned from HFNC. Laboratory tests, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) in the first 24 hours of ICU admission were recorded in both groups, vital signs and arterial blood gas analysis immediately and after 6 hours of HFNC treatment, treatment regimen, length of ICU stay, and total length of hospital stay were recorded in both groups, and patients' outcomes at 28 days and 90 days were followed up by telephone. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the above indexes, and the significant indexes were included in the binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis to analyze the influencing factors of HFNC failure in patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to analyze the 28-day and 90-day outcomes of patients in both groups. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to analyze the value of treatment 6-hour mROX index and 6-hour ROX index in predicting the success of HFNC.

Results: A total of 57 patients with ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled, including 34 patients in the HFNC success group and 23 patients in the HFNC failure group. Procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactic acid (Lac) and the proportion of vasopressors, the proportion of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the APACHE II score and the SOFA score, the respiratory rate (RR) immediately and 6 hours after treatment were significantly higher in the HFNC failure group compared with the HFNC success group. The length of ICU stay was significantly longer, and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) at the time of treatment, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), ROX index, and mROX index at the time of treatment and at 6 hours after treatment were significantly lower in the HFNC failure group compared with the HFNC success group (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the 28-day cumulative survival rates (100% vs. 26.1%) and 90-day cumulative survival rates (85.3% vs. 21.7%) of patients in the HFNC success group were significantly higher than those in the HFNC failure group (both P < 0.001). On binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis, Lac [odds ratio (OR) = 0.129, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.020-0.824], SOFA score (OR = 0.382, 95%CI was 0.158-0.925), 6-hour ROX index (OR = 0.099, 95%CI was 0.011-0.920), and 6-hour mROX index (OR = 23.703, 95%CI was 1.415-396.947) were associated with HFNC treatment outcome (all P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the 6-hour mROX index and the 6-hour ROX index for predicting the success of HFNC were both higher (0.809 and 0.714, respectively), and the AUC of 6-hour mROX index was significantly higher than that of 6-hour ROX index (P < 0.01), and the sensitivity was 88.2% and the specificity was 52.2% when the cut-off value of 6-hour mROX index was 4.5.

Conclusions: The predictive value of the 6-hour mROX index in the treatment of patients with ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is higher than that of the 6-hour ROX index, and the 6-hour mROX index is greater than 4.5, which is more likely to predict the success of HFNC treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[改良ROX指数在预测因感染SARS-CoV-2导致的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者接受高流量鼻插管氧疗的预后中的价值]。
目的研究改良ROX(mROX)指数在预测SARS-CoV-2感染所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者接受高流量鼻插管氧疗(HFNC)的预后中的价值:方法:进行了一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了2022年12月至2023年6月在兰州大学第二医院重症监护室(ICU)接受高流量鼻套管氧疗的57例SARS-CoV-2感染所致ARDS患者。根据患者是否成功脱离 HFNC,将其分为 HFNC 失败组和 HFNC 成功组。记录两组患者入ICU后24小时内的实验室检查、急性生理学和慢性健康评估II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA),HFNC治疗后6小时内和6小时后的生命体征和动脉血气分析、治疗方案、ICU住院时间和总住院时间,并电话随访患者28天和90天的预后。采用单变量分析对上述指标进行分析,并将显著指标纳入二元多变量 Logistic 回归分析,以分析患者 HFNC 失败的影响因素。绘制 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线,分析两组患者 28 天和 90 天的预后。绘制接收者操作特征曲线(ROC曲线),分析治疗6小时mROX指数和6小时ROX指数在预测HFNC成功率方面的价值:结果:共纳入57例因感染SARS-CoV-2导致的ARDS患者,其中HFNC成功组34例,HFNC失败组23例。与 HFNC 成功组相比,HFNC 失败组患者的降钙素原 (PCT)、C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、乳酸 (Lac) 和使用血管加压剂的比例、持续肾脏替代治疗 (CRRT) 的比例、APACHE II 评分和 SOFA 评分、治疗后即刻和 6 小时后的呼吸频率 (RR) 均显著升高。与HFNC成功组相比,HFNC失败组的ICU住院时间明显更长,治疗时的氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)、治疗时和治疗后6小时的脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2)、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、ROX指数和mROX指数明显更低(均P<0.05)。卡普兰-米尔生存曲线显示,HFNC成功组患者的28天累积生存率(100% vs. 26.1%)和90天累积生存率(85.3% vs. 21.7%)明显高于HFNC失败组(均为P < 0.001)。在二元多变量逻辑回归分析中,Lac [几率比(OR)= 0.129,95% 置信区间(95%CI)为 0.020-0.824]、SOFA 评分(OR = 0.382,95%CI 为 0.158-0.925)、6小时ROX指数(OR = 0.099,95%CI为0.011-0.920)和6小时mROX指数(OR = 23.703,95%CI为1.415-396.947)与HFNC治疗结果相关(均P < 0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,6小时mROX指数和6小时ROX指数预测HFNC成功率的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)均较高(分别为0.809和0.714),且6小时mROX指数的AUC显著高于6小时ROX指数(P<0.01),当6小时mROX指数的临界值为4.5时,敏感性为88.2%,特异性为52.2%:6小时mROX指数对SARS-CoV-2感染引起的ARDS患者治疗的预测价值高于6小时ROX指数,且6小时mROX指数大于4.5更有可能预测HFNC治疗的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Annexin A1 activates the G protein-coupled formyl peptide receptor type 2-dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathway to alleviate sepsis associated acute lung injury]. [Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with renal replacement therapy in the treatment of war traumatic sepsis]. [Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis of dengue fever incidence in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province in 2023]. [Design and application of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-specific line fixation device]. [Early diagnostic and prognosis prediction of circ_0054633 for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in children with severe pneumonia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1