Cybernetic States: Communication, Control, and State-Space in the Advanced Research Projects Agency

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103160
Brian Jordan Jefferson
{"title":"Cybernetic States: Communication, Control, and State-Space in the Advanced Research Projects Agency","authors":"Brian Jordan Jefferson","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While political geographers have researched state restructuring extensively over the past forty years, few have explored the role of cybernetics in this process. Conversely, although a wide spectrum of scholars outside of geography have shed light on aspects of cybernetic governance, they have yet to incorporate insights from political geography. In both cases, the political geography of cybernetic state power remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, the article explores the nexus of cybernetics and state restructuring in the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), a Cold War US defense research agency, circa 1958 to 1969. It analyzes Congressional testimonies by ARPA-sponsored scientists and engineers alongside their academic publications and other papers to grasp how they conceived of and actively sought to transform state-space. The article makes two arguments. First, while geographers treat state restructuring as a function of neoliberalization or War on Terror securitization, the process was set in motion near the start of the Cold War. It was then that ARPA's appeal to cybernetics to resolve geopolitical conflicts cemented the <em>logical, organizational, and technical foundations for neoliberal and War on Terror state mutations</em>. Second, the main thrust of ARPA responses to Cold War crises involved restructuring state-power in the mode of a cybernetic feedback control system. These efforts bring into relief a distinct object of analysis, the <em>state control system</em> (SCS), which offers geographers fresh perspectives on state restructuring and opens new pathways for interdisciplinary research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001094/pdfft?md5=c250b16e21e7271e883f863ca04e8b5a&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824001094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While political geographers have researched state restructuring extensively over the past forty years, few have explored the role of cybernetics in this process. Conversely, although a wide spectrum of scholars outside of geography have shed light on aspects of cybernetic governance, they have yet to incorporate insights from political geography. In both cases, the political geography of cybernetic state power remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, the article explores the nexus of cybernetics and state restructuring in the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), a Cold War US defense research agency, circa 1958 to 1969. It analyzes Congressional testimonies by ARPA-sponsored scientists and engineers alongside their academic publications and other papers to grasp how they conceived of and actively sought to transform state-space. The article makes two arguments. First, while geographers treat state restructuring as a function of neoliberalization or War on Terror securitization, the process was set in motion near the start of the Cold War. It was then that ARPA's appeal to cybernetics to resolve geopolitical conflicts cemented the logical, organizational, and technical foundations for neoliberal and War on Terror state mutations. Second, the main thrust of ARPA responses to Cold War crises involved restructuring state-power in the mode of a cybernetic feedback control system. These efforts bring into relief a distinct object of analysis, the state control system (SCS), which offers geographers fresh perspectives on state restructuring and opens new pathways for interdisciplinary research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
控制论状态:高级研究计划局的通信、控制和国家空间
过去四十年来,政治地理学家对国家重组进行了广泛研究,但很少有人探讨控制论在这一过程中的作用。相反,尽管地理学以外的众多学者对控制论治理的各个方面进行了深入研究,但他们尚未将政治地理学的见解纳入其中。在这两种情况下,控制论国家权力的政治地理学在很大程度上仍未被探索。为了弥补这一空白,文章探讨了大约 1958 年至 1969 年冷战时期美国国防研究机构高级研究计划局(ARPA)中控制论与国家重组之间的联系。文章分析了 ARPA 赞助的科学家和工程师的国会证词以及他们的学术出版物和其他论文,以了解他们是如何构想并积极寻求改造国家空间的。文章提出了两个论点。首先,虽然地理学家将国家结构调整视为新自由主义化或反恐战争安全化的一种功能,但这一进程是在冷战即将开始时启动的。正是在那个时候,ARPA 呼吁用控制论来解决地缘政治冲突,这为新自由主义和反恐战争的国家突变奠定了逻辑、组织和技术基础。其次,ARPA 应对冷战危机的主旨涉及以控制论反馈控制系统的模式重组国家权力。这些努力凸显了一个独特的分析对象--国家控制系统(SCS),它为地理学家提供了关于国家重组的新视角,并为跨学科研究开辟了新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
‘I felt’: Intimate geographies of sentient diplomacy Knowledge popularization in a technocratic-populist context, or how the Israeli state shaped media coverage of large-scale urban plans Introduction to the special issue – Frontiers of property: promises, pitfalls, and ambivalences of ‘resurgent collectivisation’ in global land and resource governance Checkpoints, competing ‘sovereignties’, and everyday life in Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1