Eficacia de las prácticas inclusivas para compensar los resultados académicos de escolares con dificultades del lenguaje oral y escrito

Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla, Mario Valera-Pozo, Lucía Buil-Legaz, Jorge Luis Guirado-Moreno, Daniel Adrover-Roig
{"title":"Eficacia de las prácticas inclusivas para compensar los resultados académicos de escolares con dificultades del lenguaje oral y escrito","authors":"Eva Aguilar-Mediavilla,&nbsp;Mario Valera-Pozo,&nbsp;Lucía Buil-Legaz,&nbsp;Jorge Luis Guirado-Moreno,&nbsp;Daniel Adrover-Roig","doi":"10.1016/j.rlfa.2024.100500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Previous studies have shown lower academic results in school children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and/or reading difficulties (RD). This paper aims to evaluate whether some of the measures proposed by the inclusive school to enrich the teaching-learning processes have a positive effect on the grades of school children with DLD or RD. Inclusive education measures that foster individualized communication skills are expected to exert a compensatory effect on pupils with difficulties.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The official academic history of 103 students (26 with DLD, 36 with RD, and 41 with typical development; TD) attending 10 schools from Balearic Islands were collected. Inclusive school indicators were evaluated with ACADI's questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significative correlations were found between official grades and school inclusivity scores for the DLD and TD groups, while three indicators of inclusivity showed correlations with the academic results in the RD group. The ANOVA (Group x Inclusivity) on the mean grade of the primary school revealed significant results of the Group factor, a tendency in the Inclusivity factor, but the interaction was non-significant. Grade retention frequency was similar between centers with indicators of high or low inclusivity, and higher in the DLD group compared to the RD and TD groups.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><p>Worse academic results were found in the DLD and RD groups. Inclusion measures appear to partially compensate school children with RD, but not the DLD group. In conclusion, inclusive schools must continue looking for measures to compensate for the learning difficulties of students with DLD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56174,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460324000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Previous studies have shown lower academic results in school children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and/or reading difficulties (RD). This paper aims to evaluate whether some of the measures proposed by the inclusive school to enrich the teaching-learning processes have a positive effect on the grades of school children with DLD or RD. Inclusive education measures that foster individualized communication skills are expected to exert a compensatory effect on pupils with difficulties.

Method

The official academic history of 103 students (26 with DLD, 36 with RD, and 41 with typical development; TD) attending 10 schools from Balearic Islands were collected. Inclusive school indicators were evaluated with ACADI's questionnaire.

Results

No significative correlations were found between official grades and school inclusivity scores for the DLD and TD groups, while three indicators of inclusivity showed correlations with the academic results in the RD group. The ANOVA (Group x Inclusivity) on the mean grade of the primary school revealed significant results of the Group factor, a tendency in the Inclusivity factor, but the interaction was non-significant. Grade retention frequency was similar between centers with indicators of high or low inclusivity, and higher in the DLD group compared to the RD and TD groups.

Discussion and conclusions

Worse academic results were found in the DLD and RD groups. Inclusion measures appear to partially compensate school children with RD, but not the DLD group. In conclusion, inclusive schools must continue looking for measures to compensate for the learning difficulties of students with DLD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包容性做法在补偿有口头和书面语言困难的学童的学习成绩方面的有效性
背景和目的以往的研究表明,有发展性语言障碍(DLD)和/或阅读困难(RD)的学童学习成绩较差。本文旨在评估全纳学校为丰富教与学过程而提出的一些措施是否对有发展性语言障碍或阅读困难的学童的成绩产生积极影响。方法收集了巴利阿里群岛 10 所学校 103 名学生(26 名患有 DLD,36 名患有 RD,41 名患有典型发育障碍)的正式学业成绩。结果在 DLD 组和 TD 组的正式成绩和学校包容性得分之间没有发现显著的相关性,而在 RD 组,有三项包容性指标与学习成绩存在相关性。关于小学平均成绩的方差分析(组别 x 包容性)显示,组别因素的结果显著,包容性因素有倾向性,但交互作用不显著。具有高或低包容性指标的中心的留级率相似,而 DLD 组的留级率高于 RD 组和 TD 组。全纳措施似乎可以部分补偿 RD 儿童,但不能补偿 DLD 组儿童。总之,全纳学校必须继续寻找措施,以弥补有 DLD 的学生的学习困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Estilos de afrontamiento de padres de niños con fisura labio-alveolo-palatina en los Andes Centrales del Ecuador (Cuenca-Ambato) Dos medidas de producción fonológica para la identificación de comorbilidad en los trastornos de los sonidos del habla en niños mexicanos Marc Monfort o la centralidad psicológica del lenguaje en la Logopedia (y viceversa) M. Monfort: hacer y enseñar logopedia Reading comprehension skills in children with language development disorder—Systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1