Coverage with evidence development program on stereotactic body radiotherapy in Belgium (2013–2019): a nationwide registry-based prospective study

IF 13.6 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Lancet Regional Health-Europe Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100992
Yolande Lievens , Sharon Janssens , Maarten Lambrecht , Hilde Engels , Xavier Geets , Nicolas Jansen , Luigi Moretti , Vincent Remouchamps , Sander Roosens , Karin Stellamans , Dirk Verellen , Caroline Weltens , Reinhilde Weytjens , Nancy Van Damme , Belgian College for Physicians of Radiation Oncology Centres
{"title":"Coverage with evidence development program on stereotactic body radiotherapy in Belgium (2013–2019): a nationwide registry-based prospective study","authors":"Yolande Lievens ,&nbsp;Sharon Janssens ,&nbsp;Maarten Lambrecht ,&nbsp;Hilde Engels ,&nbsp;Xavier Geets ,&nbsp;Nicolas Jansen ,&nbsp;Luigi Moretti ,&nbsp;Vincent Remouchamps ,&nbsp;Sander Roosens ,&nbsp;Karin Stellamans ,&nbsp;Dirk Verellen ,&nbsp;Caroline Weltens ,&nbsp;Reinhilde Weytjens ,&nbsp;Nancy Van Damme ,&nbsp;Belgian College for Physicians of Radiation Oncology Centres","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was progressively adopted in clinical practice in Belgium, a reimbursement request in 2011 was not granted because of remaining clinical and economic uncertainty. A coverage with evidence development (CED) program on SBRT started in 2013, with the aim to assess clinical and technical patterns-of-care in Belgium and monitor survival per indication, in view of supporting inclusion in the reimbursement system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) initiated this prospective observational registry. Participating departments, using SBRT in clinical practice, signed the ‘NIHDI convention’. Eligible patients had a primary tumour (PT) or oligometastatic disease (OMD). Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected through an online module of the Belgian Cancer Registry, prerequisite for financing. Five-year overall survival (5YOS) and 30- and 90-days mortality were primary outcomes, derived from vital status information.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between 10/2013 and 12/2019, 20 of the 24 accredited radiotherapy departments participated, 6 were academic. Registered cases per department ranged from 21 to 867. Of 5675 registrations analysed, the majority had good performance status and limited number of lesions. Enrolment of PTs remained stable over time, OMDs almost doubled. Peripheral lung lesions dominated in PTs as in OMDs. Other metastases were (para)spinal, ‘non-standard’ and hepatic. Thirty- and 90-days mortalities remained below 0.5% [95% CI 0.3%–0.8%] respectively 2.1% [95% CI 1.6%–2.7%]. 5YOS varied by indication, primary prostate patients performing best (85%, 95% CI [76%, 96%]), those with liver metastases worst (19%, 95% CI [15%, 24%]). Better OS was observed in academic departments, department size did not significantly impact survival. OMD survival was better in 2018–19.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>CED can be used to define patterns-of-care and real-life outcome of innovative radiotherapy. As the observed survival for different indications was in line with outcome in emerging literature, SBRT was included in the Belgian reimbursement system as of January 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p><span>NIHDI</span> financed participating departments per registered case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224001595/pdfft?md5=d867b6ebd6819c863ea2d9f47c7f50b3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666776224001595-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776224001595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was progressively adopted in clinical practice in Belgium, a reimbursement request in 2011 was not granted because of remaining clinical and economic uncertainty. A coverage with evidence development (CED) program on SBRT started in 2013, with the aim to assess clinical and technical patterns-of-care in Belgium and monitor survival per indication, in view of supporting inclusion in the reimbursement system.

Methods

The Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) initiated this prospective observational registry. Participating departments, using SBRT in clinical practice, signed the ‘NIHDI convention’. Eligible patients had a primary tumour (PT) or oligometastatic disease (OMD). Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected through an online module of the Belgian Cancer Registry, prerequisite for financing. Five-year overall survival (5YOS) and 30- and 90-days mortality were primary outcomes, derived from vital status information.

Findings

Between 10/2013 and 12/2019, 20 of the 24 accredited radiotherapy departments participated, 6 were academic. Registered cases per department ranged from 21 to 867. Of 5675 registrations analysed, the majority had good performance status and limited number of lesions. Enrolment of PTs remained stable over time, OMDs almost doubled. Peripheral lung lesions dominated in PTs as in OMDs. Other metastases were (para)spinal, ‘non-standard’ and hepatic. Thirty- and 90-days mortalities remained below 0.5% [95% CI 0.3%–0.8%] respectively 2.1% [95% CI 1.6%–2.7%]. 5YOS varied by indication, primary prostate patients performing best (85%, 95% CI [76%, 96%]), those with liver metastases worst (19%, 95% CI [15%, 24%]). Better OS was observed in academic departments, department size did not significantly impact survival. OMD survival was better in 2018–19.

Interpretation

CED can be used to define patterns-of-care and real-life outcome of innovative radiotherapy. As the observed survival for different indications was in line with outcome in emerging literature, SBRT was included in the Belgian reimbursement system as of January 2020.

Funding

NIHDI financed participating departments per registered case.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时立体定向体放射治疗证据开发计划的覆盖范围(2013-2019 年):一项基于全国登记的前瞻性研究
背景虽然立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在比利时的临床实践中逐步得到采用,但由于临床和经济方面仍存在不确定性,2011年的报销申请未获批准。2013年,比利时开始实施一项关于SBRT的证据开发覆盖计划(CED),旨在评估比利时的临床和技术护理模式,并监测每个适应症的存活率,以支持将其纳入报销体系。在临床实践中使用 SBRT 的参与部门签署了 "NIHDI 公约"。符合条件的患者均患有原发性肿瘤(PT)或少转移性疾病(OMD)。通过比利时癌症登记处的在线模块收集患者、肿瘤和治疗特征,这是获得资助的前提条件。五年总生存期(5YOS)以及30天和90天死亡率为主要结果,由生命体征信息得出。研究结果在2013年10月至2019年12月期间,24个获得认证的放疗科室中有20个参与了研究,其中6个为学术科室。每个科室登记的病例从21例到867例不等。在分析的 5675 例登记病例中,大多数表现良好,病变数量有限。随着时间的推移,PT 的注册人数保持稳定,OMD 的注册人数几乎翻了一番。与 OMD 一样,肺外周病变在 PT 中占主导地位。其他转移灶为(脊柱旁)、"非标准 "和肝转移灶。30天和90天的死亡率仍分别低于0.5% [95% CI 0.3%-0.8%] 和2.1% [95% CI 1.6%-2.7%] 。5年生存期因适应症而异,原发性前列腺癌患者的生存期最好(85%,95% CI [76%,96%]),肝转移患者的生存期最差(19%,95% CI [15%,24%])。在学术部门观察到更好的 OS,部门规模对生存率没有显著影响。2018-19年的OMD生存率更高。释义CED可用于定义创新放疗的护理模式和实际结果。由于观察到的不同适应症的生存率与新兴文献中的结果一致,自2020年1月起,SBRT被纳入比利时的报销体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
260
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.
期刊最新文献
Blood-based biomarkers in the oldest old: towards Alzheimer's disease detection in primary care Emerging data on SGLT2 benefits in acute coronary syndromes Ultra-processed foods and type 2 diabetes: more fundamental research is needed Getting to the heart of it: sex and gender considerations in the management of cardiovascular disease Blood microRNA testing in participants with suspicious low-dose CT findings: follow-up of the BioMILD lung cancer screening trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1