Development and validation of the Peripartum depression scale

Sandra Nakić Radoš, Marijana Matijaš, Maja Brekalo, Maja Žutić
{"title":"Development and validation of the Peripartum depression scale","authors":"Sandra Nakić Radoš,&nbsp;Marijana Matijaš,&nbsp;Maja Brekalo,&nbsp;Maja Žutić","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Peripartum depression (PPD) is the most common peripartum mental health problem. However, none of the available questionnaires evaluates depressive symptoms according to the latest DSM-5-TR (APA, 2022). Peripartum Depression Scale (PDS) is a new measure of PPD developed according to DSM-5-TR full criteria and postpartum-specific symptoms described in the literature. The aim of this study was to validate a new scale to assess depression in pregnancy and postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this online cross-sectional study, 513 pregnant women and 751 women within the 12 months postpartum completed a new PDS consisting of 43 items from Criterion A, rated on a four-point scale, and seven items on the remaining DSM-5-TR criteria. They also completed Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), and General Data Questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the one-factor model had a poor fit, but the 9-factor with a second-order factor in postpartum sample and 10-factor model with a second-order factor in pregnant sample, on the same 42-item version of scale, had a good fit to the data. The reliability of McDonald's ω of .96 was very high in both pregnant and postpartum women. Convergent and known-groups validity was demonstrated; however, correlations with stress were high.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Clinical interview was not administered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Peripartum Depression Scale is a 42-item instrument which is shown to be a valid and reliable measure to assess depression symptoms both during pregnancy and the full postpartum year according to DSM-5-TR criteria and current literature on peripartum-specific symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001069/pdfft?md5=81705671e0158eecaa80f55f4e2f4d83&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Peripartum depression (PPD) is the most common peripartum mental health problem. However, none of the available questionnaires evaluates depressive symptoms according to the latest DSM-5-TR (APA, 2022). Peripartum Depression Scale (PDS) is a new measure of PPD developed according to DSM-5-TR full criteria and postpartum-specific symptoms described in the literature. The aim of this study was to validate a new scale to assess depression in pregnancy and postpartum.

Methods

In this online cross-sectional study, 513 pregnant women and 751 women within the 12 months postpartum completed a new PDS consisting of 43 items from Criterion A, rated on a four-point scale, and seven items on the remaining DSM-5-TR criteria. They also completed Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS), and General Data Questionnaire.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the one-factor model had a poor fit, but the 9-factor with a second-order factor in postpartum sample and 10-factor model with a second-order factor in pregnant sample, on the same 42-item version of scale, had a good fit to the data. The reliability of McDonald's ω of .96 was very high in both pregnant and postpartum women. Convergent and known-groups validity was demonstrated; however, correlations with stress were high.

Limitations

Clinical interview was not administered.

Conclusion

Peripartum Depression Scale is a 42-item instrument which is shown to be a valid and reliable measure to assess depression symptoms both during pregnancy and the full postpartum year according to DSM-5-TR criteria and current literature on peripartum-specific symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期抑郁量表的开发与验证
背景围产期抑郁症(PPD)是最常见的围产期心理健康问题。然而,现有的调查问卷都不能根据最新的 DSM-5-TR(美国心理学会,2022 年)评估抑郁症状。围产期抑郁量表(PDS)是根据 DSM-5-TR 的全部标准和文献中描述的产后特异性症状开发的一种新的 PPD 测量方法。本研究的目的是验证评估孕期和产后抑郁的新量表。方法在这项在线横断面研究中,513 名孕妇和 751 名产后 12 个月内的妇女完成了新的 PDS,该量表由标准 A 中的 43 个条目和 DSM-5-TR 标准中的其余 7 个条目组成,采用四点量表评分。结果确认性因子分析证实,单因子模型的拟合度较差,但在产后样本中使用的带有二阶因子的 9 因子模型和在怀孕样本中使用的带有二阶因子的 10 因子模型,在相同的 42 个项目的量表版本上,与数据的拟合度较好。孕妇和产后妇女的麦克唐纳ω信度均为0.96,信度非常高。结论:产后抑郁量表是一个由42个项目组成的量表,根据DSM-5-TR标准和目前有关围产期特异性症状的文献,该量表是评估孕期和整个产后抑郁症状的有效而可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1