Are you learning or performing? A comparison of students’ goal orientation during experimentation at an outreach science laboratory and at school using the CEAS model

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101972
Tim Kirchhoff , Matthias Wilde , Christoph Randler , Nadine Großmann
{"title":"Are you learning or performing? A comparison of students’ goal orientation during experimentation at an outreach science laboratory and at school using the CEAS model","authors":"Tim Kirchhoff ,&nbsp;Matthias Wilde ,&nbsp;Christoph Randler ,&nbsp;Nadine Großmann","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Many outreach science laboratories have been established in the fields of STEM to counteract negative developments in student motivation such as a decrease in mastery-approach goal orientation and an increase in avoidance-performance goal orientation. Studies to date have not yet addressed the question whether a visit to an outreach science laboratory could have a buffering or counteracting effect on these negative developments.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated differences in students’ state goal orientations, state of interest, perceived need satisfaction, and perceived pressure when conducting experiments in an outreach science laboratory or at school.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Participants were 358 German school students (age: <em>M</em> = 16.43 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.76 years; gender: 58% female).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a quasi-experimental study, the students conducted the same experiments at an outreach science laboratory (<em>n</em> = 186) or at school (<em>n</em> = 171) under local conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The students in the outreach science laboratory perceived themselves as more competent, more related, and less pressured than the students at school. Their state of interest and perceived autonomy were similarly high. Furthermore, we found no differences in their state mastery-approach goal orientation, while the students in the outreach science laboratory exhibited lower performance goal orientations than the students at school.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings support the assumption that students may be motivated to learn about biological content in outreach science laboratories as at school, but with more competence perception and beyond performance pressure. Regarding the recent negative developments of student motivation, outreach science laboratories might be valuable complements to formal biology education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999/pdfft?md5=c5191ffe79860aa89bf1be7eb77ab776&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000999-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many outreach science laboratories have been established in the fields of STEM to counteract negative developments in student motivation such as a decrease in mastery-approach goal orientation and an increase in avoidance-performance goal orientation. Studies to date have not yet addressed the question whether a visit to an outreach science laboratory could have a buffering or counteracting effect on these negative developments.

Aims

We investigated differences in students’ state goal orientations, state of interest, perceived need satisfaction, and perceived pressure when conducting experiments in an outreach science laboratory or at school.

Sample

Participants were 358 German school students (age: M = 16.43 years, SD = 0.76 years; gender: 58% female).

Methods

In a quasi-experimental study, the students conducted the same experiments at an outreach science laboratory (n = 186) or at school (n = 171) under local conditions.

Results

The students in the outreach science laboratory perceived themselves as more competent, more related, and less pressured than the students at school. Their state of interest and perceived autonomy were similarly high. Furthermore, we found no differences in their state mastery-approach goal orientation, while the students in the outreach science laboratory exhibited lower performance goal orientations than the students at school.

Conclusions

Our findings support the assumption that students may be motivated to learn about biological content in outreach science laboratories as at school, but with more competence perception and beyond performance pressure. Regarding the recent negative developments of student motivation, outreach science laboratories might be valuable complements to formal biology education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你是在学习还是在表演?使用 CEAS 模型比较学生在外联科学实验室和学校进行实验时的目标定位
背景在科学、技术、工程和数学领域建立了许多外展科学实验室,以抵消学生学习动机中的负面发展,如掌握-接近目标导向的减少和逃避-表现目标导向的增加。目的我们调查了学生在外延科学实验室和在学校做实验时,在状态目标取向、兴趣状态、感知需求满足和感知压力方面的差异。方法在一项准实验研究中,学生们在当地条件下分别在外联科学实验室(186 人)和学校(171 人)进行了相同的实验。他们的兴趣和自主感也同样很高。结论我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即学生在外联科学实验室学习生物内容的动机可能与在学校一样,但能力感知更强,成绩压力更小。鉴于最近学生学习动机的负面发展,外展科学实验室可能是正规生物教育的重要补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Competitive and non-competitive school climate and students’ well-being Comparison effects on self- and external ratings: Testing the generalizability of the 2I/E model to parents and teachers of academic track school students Testing the CONIC model: The interplay of conscientiousness and interest in predicting academic effort Metacognitive scaffolding for digital reading and mind-wandering in adults with and without ADHD Retrieval supports word learning in children with Down syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1