Parents’ spatial talk predicts toddlers’ spatial language gains

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102107
Danielle S. Fox , Andrew Ribner , Joei Camarote , Elizabeth Vortuba-Drzal , Heather J. Bachman , Melissa E. Libertus
{"title":"Parents’ spatial talk predicts toddlers’ spatial language gains","authors":"Danielle S. Fox ,&nbsp;Andrew Ribner ,&nbsp;Joei Camarote ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Vortuba-Drzal ,&nbsp;Heather J. Bachman ,&nbsp;Melissa E. Libertus","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Young children who hear more frequent spatial language demonstrate better spatial skills (Casasola et al., 2020). Additionally, play contexts can influence how much spatial language parents use (Ferrara et al., 2011). However, most studies have focused on preschoolers and have not specifically analyzed how different types of spatial language within various play contexts relate to outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The present study investigates how parents' use of spatial relational language (e.g., \"next to,\" \"below\") and other spatial language during spatial and non-spatial play predicts toddlers’ concurrent and later verbal and non-verbal spatial skills.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>The study involved 169 socio-economically diverse 2-year-olds and their parents from the Northeastern United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dyads completed three structured play activities, including a spatial puzzle task and two non-spatial activities. At age 2 and 3, children completed modified versions of the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task (Casasola et al., 2020) and the Test of Spatial Assembly (Verdine et al., 2014).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Parents' use of spatial relational language during the puzzle task predicted better performance on the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task concurrently at age 2 (β = .24, p = .02) and one year later at age 3 (β = .19, p = .04). Parents' use of other spatial language and spatial relational language during non-spatial activities was not associated with children's spatial skills regardless of age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Frequent exposure to spatial relational language within a spatial play context supports toddlers' concurrent and later comprehension of spatial terms, highlighting the importance of providing specific learning opportunities that promote understanding of spatial language.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Young children who hear more frequent spatial language demonstrate better spatial skills (Casasola et al., 2020). Additionally, play contexts can influence how much spatial language parents use (Ferrara et al., 2011). However, most studies have focused on preschoolers and have not specifically analyzed how different types of spatial language within various play contexts relate to outcomes.

Aims

The present study investigates how parents' use of spatial relational language (e.g., "next to," "below") and other spatial language during spatial and non-spatial play predicts toddlers’ concurrent and later verbal and non-verbal spatial skills.

Sample

The study involved 169 socio-economically diverse 2-year-olds and their parents from the Northeastern United States.

Methods

Dyads completed three structured play activities, including a spatial puzzle task and two non-spatial activities. At age 2 and 3, children completed modified versions of the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task (Casasola et al., 2020) and the Test of Spatial Assembly (Verdine et al., 2014).

Results

Parents' use of spatial relational language during the puzzle task predicted better performance on the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task concurrently at age 2 (β = .24, p = .02) and one year later at age 3 (β = .19, p = .04). Parents' use of other spatial language and spatial relational language during non-spatial activities was not associated with children's spatial skills regardless of age.

Conclusions

Frequent exposure to spatial relational language within a spatial play context supports toddlers' concurrent and later comprehension of spatial terms, highlighting the importance of providing specific learning opportunities that promote understanding of spatial language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
The growth trajectories of oral and silent word reading fluency before and after COVID-19 Parents’ spatial talk predicts toddlers’ spatial language gains Do worked examples boost the spacing effect on lasting learning? Resilience research in learning disabilities: Guiding principles from developmental psychopathology How do teachers process technology-based formative assessment results in their daily practice? Results from process mining of think-aloud data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1