Danielle S. Fox , Andrew Ribner , Joei Camarote , Elizabeth Vortuba-Drzal , Heather J. Bachman , Melissa E. Libertus
{"title":"Parents’ spatial talk predicts toddlers’ spatial language gains","authors":"Danielle S. Fox , Andrew Ribner , Joei Camarote , Elizabeth Vortuba-Drzal , Heather J. Bachman , Melissa E. Libertus","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Young children who hear more frequent spatial language demonstrate better spatial skills (Casasola et al., 2020). Additionally, play contexts can influence how much spatial language parents use (Ferrara et al., 2011). However, most studies have focused on preschoolers and have not specifically analyzed how different types of spatial language within various play contexts relate to outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The present study investigates how parents' use of spatial relational language (e.g., \"next to,\" \"below\") and other spatial language during spatial and non-spatial play predicts toddlers’ concurrent and later verbal and non-verbal spatial skills.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>The study involved 169 socio-economically diverse 2-year-olds and their parents from the Northeastern United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dyads completed three structured play activities, including a spatial puzzle task and two non-spatial activities. At age 2 and 3, children completed modified versions of the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task (Casasola et al., 2020) and the Test of Spatial Assembly (Verdine et al., 2014).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Parents' use of spatial relational language during the puzzle task predicted better performance on the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task concurrently at age 2 (β = .24, p = .02) and one year later at age 3 (β = .19, p = .04). Parents' use of other spatial language and spatial relational language during non-spatial activities was not associated with children's spatial skills regardless of age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Frequent exposure to spatial relational language within a spatial play context supports toddlers' concurrent and later comprehension of spatial terms, highlighting the importance of providing specific learning opportunities that promote understanding of spatial language.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102107"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Young children who hear more frequent spatial language demonstrate better spatial skills (Casasola et al., 2020). Additionally, play contexts can influence how much spatial language parents use (Ferrara et al., 2011). However, most studies have focused on preschoolers and have not specifically analyzed how different types of spatial language within various play contexts relate to outcomes.
Aims
The present study investigates how parents' use of spatial relational language (e.g., "next to," "below") and other spatial language during spatial and non-spatial play predicts toddlers’ concurrent and later verbal and non-verbal spatial skills.
Sample
The study involved 169 socio-economically diverse 2-year-olds and their parents from the Northeastern United States.
Methods
Dyads completed three structured play activities, including a spatial puzzle task and two non-spatial activities. At age 2 and 3, children completed modified versions of the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task (Casasola et al., 2020) and the Test of Spatial Assembly (Verdine et al., 2014).
Results
Parents' use of spatial relational language during the puzzle task predicted better performance on the Point-to-Spatial-Relation task concurrently at age 2 (β = .24, p = .02) and one year later at age 3 (β = .19, p = .04). Parents' use of other spatial language and spatial relational language during non-spatial activities was not associated with children's spatial skills regardless of age.
Conclusions
Frequent exposure to spatial relational language within a spatial play context supports toddlers' concurrent and later comprehension of spatial terms, highlighting the importance of providing specific learning opportunities that promote understanding of spatial language.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.