Marginals within the marginalised: Exploring the changes in occupational pattern among Adivasi women in the context of land alienation in India

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106715
John Kujur , Udaya S Mishra , S. Irudaya Rajan , Hrushikesh Mallick
{"title":"Marginals within the marginalised: Exploring the changes in occupational pattern among Adivasi women in the context of land alienation in India","authors":"John Kujur ,&nbsp;Udaya S Mishra ,&nbsp;S. Irudaya Rajan ,&nbsp;Hrushikesh Mallick","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the changes in occupational patterns and addresses the problem of transitioning from paid activities to unpaid activities among Adivasi women in the context of land alienation. We use data sources, viz. the 50th and 68th rounds of Employment and Unemployment Survey, the Periodic Labour Force Survey (2022–23) and the Time Use Survey (2019) of the NSSO. We apply simple descriptive statistics, binary and multinomial logistic regression models to derive reasonable inferences. The study reveals that between 1993–94 and 2011–12, Adivasi women’s labour force participation has declined more when compared to women from other social groups. However, between 2011–12 and 2023–24, their participation has increased which can be attributed to increase in their participation in unpaid family labour and own account works. The study deduces that landholding size determines their participation in the labour market, and quality of occupations. Larger landholding size is an enabling factor which enhances the propensity of Adivasi women to take up better-paid occupations, while lower landholding size increases the risk of taking up either employment in precarious occupations or unpaid domestic duties. The findings reinforce the argument that landholdings play a crucial role among Adivasis in maintaining the relative egalitarian values in their society. Finally, this study suggests measures to improve the LFPR of Adivasi women and the quality of their employment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106715"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24001852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the changes in occupational patterns and addresses the problem of transitioning from paid activities to unpaid activities among Adivasi women in the context of land alienation. We use data sources, viz. the 50th and 68th rounds of Employment and Unemployment Survey, the Periodic Labour Force Survey (2022–23) and the Time Use Survey (2019) of the NSSO. We apply simple descriptive statistics, binary and multinomial logistic regression models to derive reasonable inferences. The study reveals that between 1993–94 and 2011–12, Adivasi women’s labour force participation has declined more when compared to women from other social groups. However, between 2011–12 and 2023–24, their participation has increased which can be attributed to increase in their participation in unpaid family labour and own account works. The study deduces that landholding size determines their participation in the labour market, and quality of occupations. Larger landholding size is an enabling factor which enhances the propensity of Adivasi women to take up better-paid occupations, while lower landholding size increases the risk of taking up either employment in precarious occupations or unpaid domestic duties. The findings reinforce the argument that landholdings play a crucial role among Adivasis in maintaining the relative egalitarian values in their society. Finally, this study suggests measures to improve the LFPR of Adivasi women and the quality of their employment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘人中的边缘人:探索印度土地异化背景下阿迪瓦西妇女职业模式的变化
本研究探讨了职业模式的变化,并解决了阿迪瓦西妇女在土地让渡背景下从有偿活动过渡到无偿活动的问题。我们使用的数据来源包括第 50 轮和第 68 轮就业和失业调查、定期劳动力调查(2022-23 年)以及国家社会保险局的时间使用调查(2019 年)。我们运用简单的描述性统计、二元和多项式逻辑回归模型得出合理的推论。研究显示,在 1993-94 年至 2011-12 年期间,与其他社会群体的妇女相比,阿迪瓦西妇女的劳动力参与率下降幅度更大。然而,在 2011-12 年至 2023-24 年期间,她们的劳动力参与率有所上升,这可能是由于她们更多地参与了无报酬的家庭劳动和自营工作。研究推断,土地占有规模决定了她们在劳动力市场的参与程度和职业质量。土地保有量越大,阿迪瓦西妇女越倾向于从事报酬较高的职业,而土地保有量越小,她们从事不稳定职业或无报酬家务劳动的风险就越大。研究结果强化了这一论点,即在阿迪瓦西人中,土地保有量在维持其社会中相对平等的价值观方面发挥着至关重要的作用。最后,本研究提出了提高阿迪瓦西族妇女的长效劳动生产率及其就业质量的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
期刊最新文献
Restoring property rights: The effects of land restitution on credit access What do aid recipients want? Public attitudes toward foreign aid in developing countries Who are the “vanguard” women? Strategies for identifying women going against economic participation norms across 49 low- and middle-income countries Water affordability challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean: Accounting for coping costs due to reliance on multiple, non-exclusive sources Rethinking climate conflicts: The role of climate action and inaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1