Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience.
{"title":"Plate fixation of inferior ramus in pubis-ischium ramus improves mechanical stability in Tile B pelvic injures: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis and early clinical experience.","authors":"Zhongjie Pan, Lili Qin, Xiaorong Shi, Feng Hu, Yuquan Li, Muwen Li, Min Chen, Wengui Huang, Yuanjun Li, Zhi Yang, Jinmin Zhao, Wei Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12938-024-01262-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus remains controversial, and related research is sparse. The main intention of this study is to describe the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of pubis-ischium ramus fractures in Tile B pelvic injuries and to identify the feasibility and necessity of fixation of the inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study comprised two parts: a biomechanical test and a retrospective clinical study. For the biomechanical tests, Tile B-type pelvic injuries were modeled in six cadaver specimens by performing pubis-ischium osteotomies and disruption of the anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The superior and/or inferior rami of the pubis-ischium ramus were repaired with reconstruction plates and separated into three groups (A, B, and C). Specimens were placed in the standing position and were loaded axially with two-leg support for three cycles at 500 N. The displacements of sacroiliac joints at osteotomy were measured with Vernier calipers and compared using statistical software. To investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique, 26 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a superior ramus fixation group (Group D) and a combined superior and inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus fixation group (Group E). The main outcome measures were time of operation, blood loss, postoperative radiographic reduction grading, and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the vertical loading test, Group E showed better pelvic ring stability than Group D (P < 0.05). However, the shift of the sacroiliac joints was almost identical among the three groups. In our clinical case series, all fractures in Group E achieved bony union. Group E demonstrated earlier weight-bearing functional exercise (2.54 ± 1.45 vs 4.77 ± 2.09; P = 0.004), earlier bony union (13.23 ± 2.89 vs 16.55 ± 3.11; P = 0.013), and better functional outcomes (89.77 ± 7.27 vs 82.38 ± 8.81; P = 0.028) than Group D. The incidence of sexual dysfunction was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group D (2/13 vs 7/13; P = 0.039). Bone nonunion occurred in two patients in Group D, and two patients in Group E had heterotopic ossification. None of the patients exhibited wound complications, infections, implant failures, or bone-implant interface failures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fixation of the inferior ramus of a pubis-ischium ramus fracture based on conventional fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is mechanically superior in cadaveric Tile B pelvic injury and shows rapid recovery, good functional outcomes, and low incidence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"23 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11241975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01262-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Management of inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus remains controversial, and related research is sparse. The main intention of this study is to describe the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of pubis-ischium ramus fractures in Tile B pelvic injuries and to identify the feasibility and necessity of fixation of the inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus.
Methods: This study comprised two parts: a biomechanical test and a retrospective clinical study. For the biomechanical tests, Tile B-type pelvic injuries were modeled in six cadaver specimens by performing pubis-ischium osteotomies and disruption of the anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments. The superior and/or inferior rami of the pubis-ischium ramus were repaired with reconstruction plates and separated into three groups (A, B, and C). Specimens were placed in the standing position and were loaded axially with two-leg support for three cycles at 500 N. The displacements of sacroiliac joints at osteotomy were measured with Vernier calipers and compared using statistical software. To investigate the clinical outcomes of this technique, 26 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a superior ramus fixation group (Group D) and a combined superior and inferior ramus of the pubis-ischium ramus fixation group (Group E). The main outcome measures were time of operation, blood loss, postoperative radiographic reduction grading, and functional outcomes.
Results: In the vertical loading test, Group E showed better pelvic ring stability than Group D (P < 0.05). However, the shift of the sacroiliac joints was almost identical among the three groups. In our clinical case series, all fractures in Group E achieved bony union. Group E demonstrated earlier weight-bearing functional exercise (2.54 ± 1.45 vs 4.77 ± 2.09; P = 0.004), earlier bony union (13.23 ± 2.89 vs 16.55 ± 3.11; P = 0.013), and better functional outcomes (89.77 ± 7.27 vs 82.38 ± 8.81; P = 0.028) than Group D. The incidence of sexual dysfunction was significantly lower in Group E than that in Group D (2/13 vs 7/13; P = 0.039). Bone nonunion occurred in two patients in Group D, and two patients in Group E had heterotopic ossification. None of the patients exhibited wound complications, infections, implant failures, or bone-implant interface failures.
Conclusions: Fixation of the inferior ramus of a pubis-ischium ramus fracture based on conventional fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is mechanically superior in cadaveric Tile B pelvic injury and shows rapid recovery, good functional outcomes, and low incidence of complications.
耻骨-髂骨下横突的钢板固定提高了 Tile B 骨盆损伤的机械稳定性:尸体生物力学分析和早期临床经验。
背景:耻骨-髂骨下横突的处理仍存在争议,相关研究也很少。本研究的主要目的是描述 Tile B 骨盆损伤中耻骨-髂骨斜嵴骨折的生物力学和临床结果,并确定耻骨-髂骨斜嵴下端固定的可行性和必要性:本研究包括两部分:生物力学测试和回顾性临床研究。在生物力学测试中,通过对耻骨-髂骨进行截骨并破坏骶髂前韧带和骨间韧带,在六具尸体标本中模拟了泰勒 B 型骨盆损伤。耻骨-髂骨横突的上横突和(或)下横突用重建板修复,并分为三组(A、B 和 C)。用游标卡尺测量截骨处骶髂关节的位移,并用统计软件进行比较。为研究该技术的临床疗效,对 26 例患者进行了回顾性分析,并将其分为耻骨上匝肌固定组(D 组)和耻骨-髂骨上匝肌和耻骨-髂骨下匝肌联合固定组(E 组)。主要结果指标为手术时间、失血量、术后影像学缩小分级和功能结果:结果:在垂直加载试验中,E 组的骨盆环稳定性优于 D 组(P 结论:E 组的骨盆环稳定性优于 D 组):在尸体 Tile B 骨盆损伤中,基于传统骨盆前环固定的耻骨髂嵴骨折下嵴固定在力学上更具优势,且恢复快、功能效果好、并发症发生率低。
期刊介绍:
BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering.
BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
Bioinformatics-
Bioinstrumentation-
Biomechanics-
Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation-
Biomedical Signal Processing-
Healthcare Information Systems-
Human Dynamics-
Neural Engineering-
Rehabilitation Engineering-
Biomaterials-
Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing-
BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices-
Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies-
Biomolecular Engineering-
Biosensors-
Cardiovascular Systems Engineering-
Cellular Engineering-
Clinical Engineering-
Computational Biology-
Drug Delivery Technologies-
Modeling Methodologies-
Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine-
Respiratory Systems Engineering-
Robotics in Medicine-
Systems and Synthetic Biology-
Systems Biology-
Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine-
Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies-
Tissue Engineering