Patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of LCS pulmonary nodule results.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89581
Daoyue Wang, Rui Shi, Lili Hu, Ran Chen, Jun Sun, Wei Huang, Hongyang Zhou, Feng Rong
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of LCS pulmonary nodule results.","authors":"Daoyue Wang, Rui Shi, Lili Hu, Ran Chen, Jun Sun, Wei Huang, Hongyang Zhou, Feng Rong","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of lung cancer screening (LCS) pulmonary nodule results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective randomized controlled trial of LCS between May and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants came from a prospective randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule results in LCS with low-dose CT (LDCT) to analyze patient satisfaction, perception of information received via letters, preferred methods of receiving results, and dissatisfaction-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 153 patients were detected to have pulmonary nodules among 600 recruited participants in the lung cancer high-risk group screened using LDCT. Most of the patients were satisfied with receiving pulmonary nodule results via letters (78.4%; n = 120) and agreed that the letters contained an appropriate amount of information (83.7%; n = 128). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that satisfaction was related to age (OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.832-0.985), education level (OR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.041-3.250), no family history of cancer (OR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.011-0.914), and the number of nodules (OR, 6.028; 95% CI, 1.641-22.141). Of the patients who reported dissatisfaction with letter-based communication (7.2%; n = 11), the most common reasons cited were that they contained insufficient patient education materials and that it was difficult to comprehend the medical terminology. The majority of participants (61.4%; n = 94) reported that they would prefer the letter-based communication. No correlation was identified between satisfaction and gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, risk factors, nodule size, or nodule location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients were generally satisfied with receiving their LCS pulmonary nodule results via letters, reporting that the letters included adequate information about their diagnosis and follow-up steps. This may provide a basis for feasible result communication via letters for cancer screening programs in underdeveloped regions in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of lung cancer screening (LCS) pulmonary nodule results.

Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial of LCS between May and December 2019.

Methods: All participants came from a prospective randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule results in LCS with low-dose CT (LDCT) to analyze patient satisfaction, perception of information received via letters, preferred methods of receiving results, and dissatisfaction-related characteristics.

Results: A total of 153 patients were detected to have pulmonary nodules among 600 recruited participants in the lung cancer high-risk group screened using LDCT. Most of the patients were satisfied with receiving pulmonary nodule results via letters (78.4%; n = 120) and agreed that the letters contained an appropriate amount of information (83.7%; n = 128). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that satisfaction was related to age (OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.832-0.985), education level (OR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.041-3.250), no family history of cancer (OR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.011-0.914), and the number of nodules (OR, 6.028; 95% CI, 1.641-22.141). Of the patients who reported dissatisfaction with letter-based communication (7.2%; n = 11), the most common reasons cited were that they contained insufficient patient education materials and that it was difficult to comprehend the medical terminology. The majority of participants (61.4%; n = 94) reported that they would prefer the letter-based communication. No correlation was identified between satisfaction and gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, risk factors, nodule size, or nodule location.

Conclusions: Patients were generally satisfied with receiving their LCS pulmonary nodule results via letters, reporting that the letters included adequate information about their diagnosis and follow-up steps. This may provide a basis for feasible result communication via letters for cancer screening programs in underdeveloped regions in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对 LCS 肺结节结果信件沟通的满意度。
目的:分析患者对肺癌筛查(LCS)肺结节结果信件沟通的满意度:分析患者对肺癌筛查(LCS)肺结节结果信件沟通的满意度:2019年5月至12月期间进行的肺癌筛查前瞻性随机对照试验:所有参与者均来自低剂量CT(LDCT)肺癌筛查(LCS)肺结节结果的前瞻性随机对照研究,以分析患者满意度、对通过信件接收信息的感知、接收结果的首选方法以及与不满意相关的特征:在使用低剂量 CT 筛查的 600 名肺癌高危人群中,共有 153 名患者被检测出患有肺结节。大多数患者对通过信件收到肺结节结果表示满意(78.4%;n = 120),并认为信件包含的信息量适当(83.7%;n = 128)。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,满意度与年龄(OR,0.905;95% CI,0.832-0.985)、教育程度(OR,0.367;95% CI,0.041-3.250)、无癌症家族史(OR,0.100;95% CI,0.011-0.914)和结节数量(OR,6.028;95% CI,1.641-22.141)有关。在对信件沟通表示不满意的患者中(7.2%;n = 11),最常见的原因是信件中包含的患者教育资料不足以及难以理解医学术语。大多数参与者(61.4%;n = 94)表示,他们更喜欢信件沟通方式。满意度与性别、吸烟状况、饮酒量、风险因素、结节大小或结节位置之间没有相关性:患者对通过信件接收 LCS 肺结节结果普遍表示满意,并称信件中包含了有关诊断和后续步骤的充分信息。这可能为中国欠发达地区的癌症筛查项目通过信件传达结果提供了可行的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Management strategies for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Accountable care organizations and HPV vaccine uptake: a multilevel analysis. Cost savings from an mHealth tool for improving medication adherence. Hospital stays and probable dementia as predictors of relocation to long-term care facilities. Impact of functional recovery on patients having heart surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1