Cost savings from an mHealth tool for improving medication adherence.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89621
Chad Stecher, Sebastian Linnemayr, Peter Reaven, Sara Cloonan, Peter Huckfeldt
{"title":"Cost savings from an mHealth tool for improving medication adherence.","authors":"Chad Stecher, Sebastian Linnemayr, Peter Reaven, Sara Cloonan, Peter Huckfeldt","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the health care cost savings from the Wellth app, a mobile health intervention that uses financial incentives to increase medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational study of members in one of Arizona's Medicaid managed care plans, part of Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), using the Wellth app from March 28, 2020, to January 12, 2021. One-to-one matching was used to identify comparable nonparticipants, and a difference-in-differences approach was used to estimate the impact of the Wellth intervention on outcomes defined over the 9 months before and after using Wellth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An AHCCCS managed care health plan provided claims data that contained drug prescription, health care utilization, and health care cost information for all participants, and Wellth provided app usage data and contextual information about the Wellth intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the Wellth intervention increased medication adherence by 5.0 percentage points (95% CI, 2.9-7.1; P = .008) and reduced emergency department (-0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01; P = .002), inpatient (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.02; P = .001), and mental health clinic (-0.06; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01; P = .013) visits relative to nonparticipants over 9 months. Short-term reductions in utilization had an estimated mean cost savings over 9 months of $88.15 (95% CI, $31.07-$136.40), with greater reductions for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, or major depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Given the relatively low cost of the Wellth intervention, our findings provide preliminary evidence of cost savings from implementing Wellth among adults with several common chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"30 10","pages":"e289-e296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the health care cost savings from the Wellth app, a mobile health intervention that uses financial incentives to increase medication adherence.

Study design: An observational study of members in one of Arizona's Medicaid managed care plans, part of Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), using the Wellth app from March 28, 2020, to January 12, 2021. One-to-one matching was used to identify comparable nonparticipants, and a difference-in-differences approach was used to estimate the impact of the Wellth intervention on outcomes defined over the 9 months before and after using Wellth.

Methods: An AHCCCS managed care health plan provided claims data that contained drug prescription, health care utilization, and health care cost information for all participants, and Wellth provided app usage data and contextual information about the Wellth intervention.

Results: On average, the Wellth intervention increased medication adherence by 5.0 percentage points (95% CI, 2.9-7.1; P = .008) and reduced emergency department (-0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01; P = .002), inpatient (-0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.02; P = .001), and mental health clinic (-0.06; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01; P = .013) visits relative to nonparticipants over 9 months. Short-term reductions in utilization had an estimated mean cost savings over 9 months of $88.15 (95% CI, $31.07-$136.40), with greater reductions for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, or major depression.

Conclusions:  Given the relatively low cost of the Wellth intervention, our findings provide preliminary evidence of cost savings from implementing Wellth among adults with several common chronic conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用移动医疗工具改善服药依从性可节约成本。
研究目的研究设计:对亚利桑那州医疗补助管理式医疗计划(亚利桑那州医疗成本控制体系 (AHCCCS) 的一部分)的成员进行观察研究,研究对象为 2020 年 3 月 28 日至 2021 年 1 月 12 日期间使用 Wellth 应用程序的成员。采用一对一配对的方法确定可比的非参与者,并采用差异法估算 Wellth 干预对使用 Wellth 前后 9 个月的结果的影响:AHCCCS 管理式医疗保健计划提供了包含所有参与者的药物处方、医疗保健使用和医疗保健成本信息的索赔数据,Wellth 提供了应用程序使用数据和有关 Wellth 干预的背景信息:平均而言,Wellth 干预措施将用药依从性提高了 5.0 个百分点(95% CI,2.9-7.1;P = .008),并在 9 个月内减少了急诊就诊率(-0.02;95% CI,-0.03 至 -0.01;P = .002)、住院就诊率(-0.04;95% CI,-0.06 至 -0.02;P = .001)和心理健康诊所就诊率(-0.06;95% CI,-0.10 至 -0.01;P = .013)。据估计,9 个月内短期减少的就诊次数平均可节省 88.15 美元(95% CI,31.07-136.40 美元),慢性阻塞性肺病患者、精神分裂症患者或重度抑郁症患者减少的就诊次数更多: 鉴于 Wellth 干预措施的成本相对较低,我们的研究结果提供了初步证据,证明在患有几种常见慢性疾病的成年人中实施 Wellth 可以节约成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Association between screening for suspected COVID-19 cases and outcomes of patients revisiting the emergency department. Cancellations in primary care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Collaboration to transition members to preferred formulary dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor. Effects of individualized nurse-led care plans on olaparib treatment duration. High-intensity home-based rehabilitation in a Medicare accountable care organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1