Skills and cautiousness predict performance in difficult search

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Attention Perception & Psychophysics Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.3758/s13414-024-02923-5
Zoe Jing Xu, Simona Buetti, Yan Xia, Alejandro Lleras
{"title":"Skills and cautiousness predict performance in difficult search","authors":"Zoe Jing Xu,&nbsp;Simona Buetti,&nbsp;Yan Xia,&nbsp;Alejandro Lleras","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02923-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People differ in how well they search. What are the factors that might contribute to this variability? We tested the contribution of two cognitive abilities: visual working memory (VWM) capacity and object recognition ability. Participants completed three tasks: a difficult inefficient visual search task, where they searched for a target letter <i>T</i> among skewed <i>L</i> distractors; a VWM task, where they memorized a color array and then identified whether a probed color belonged to the previous array; and the Novel Object Memory Test (NOMT), where they learnt complex novel objects and then identified them amongst objects that closely resembled them. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that there are two latent factors that explain the shared variance among these three tasks: a factor indicative of the level of caution participants exercised during the challenging visual search task, and a factor representing their visual cognitive abilities. People who score high on the search cautiousness tend to perform a more accurate but slower search. People who score high on the visual cognitive ability factor tend to have a higher VWM capacity, a better object recognition ability, and a faster search speed. The results reflect two points: (1) Visual search tasks share components with visual working memory and object recognition tasks. (2) Search performance is influenced not only by the search display’s properties but also by individual predispositions such as caution and general visual abilities. This study introduces new factors for consideration when interpreting variations in visual search behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"86 6","pages":"1897 - 1912"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02923-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People differ in how well they search. What are the factors that might contribute to this variability? We tested the contribution of two cognitive abilities: visual working memory (VWM) capacity and object recognition ability. Participants completed three tasks: a difficult inefficient visual search task, where they searched for a target letter T among skewed L distractors; a VWM task, where they memorized a color array and then identified whether a probed color belonged to the previous array; and the Novel Object Memory Test (NOMT), where they learnt complex novel objects and then identified them amongst objects that closely resembled them. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that there are two latent factors that explain the shared variance among these three tasks: a factor indicative of the level of caution participants exercised during the challenging visual search task, and a factor representing their visual cognitive abilities. People who score high on the search cautiousness tend to perform a more accurate but slower search. People who score high on the visual cognitive ability factor tend to have a higher VWM capacity, a better object recognition ability, and a faster search speed. The results reflect two points: (1) Visual search tasks share components with visual working memory and object recognition tasks. (2) Search performance is influenced not only by the search display’s properties but also by individual predispositions such as caution and general visual abilities. This study introduces new factors for consideration when interpreting variations in visual search behaviors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技能和谨慎程度可预测困难搜索中的表现。
人们的搜索能力各不相同。造成这种差异的因素有哪些?我们测试了两种认知能力的贡献:视觉工作记忆(VWM)能力和物体识别能力。受试者完成了三项任务:一项难度较高的低效视觉搜索任务,受试者在倾斜的L干扰物中寻找目标字母T;一项视觉工作记忆任务,受试者记住一个颜色阵列,然后辨别探测到的颜色是否属于之前的颜色阵列;以及一项新奇物体记忆测试(NOMT),受试者学习复杂的新奇物体,然后在与之非常相似的物体中辨别它们。探索性和确认性因素分析表明,有两个潜在因素可以解释这三个任务之间的共同差异:一个因素表明参与者在具有挑战性的视觉搜索任务中的谨慎程度,另一个因素则代表他们的视觉认知能力。搜索谨慎程度得分高的人往往会进行更准确但更缓慢的搜索。在视觉认知能力因子上得分高的人往往具有更高的 VWM 容量、更好的物体识别能力和更快的搜索速度。这些结果反映了两点:(1)视觉搜索任务与视觉工作记忆和物体识别任务有共同的成分。(2)搜索表现不仅受搜索显示属性的影响,还受个人倾向(如谨慎和一般视觉能力)的影响。本研究为解释视觉搜索行为的变化引入了新的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the neural underpinnings of attention in the real world via co-registration of eye movements and EEG/MEG: An introduction to the special issue. Distractor-response binding influences visual search. The haptic cues humans use to sense small numbers of objects in a box. A SNARC-like effect for visual speed. Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1