Ultrasound-based airway assessment in obese patients as a valuable tool for predicting difficult airway: an observational study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844539
{"title":"Ultrasound-based airway assessment in obese patients as a valuable tool for predicting difficult airway: an observational study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Difficult airway, characterized by difficult mask ventilation and intubation, is common in obese patients undergoing surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic efficiency of ultrasound-measured anterior cervical soft tissue parameters as an indicator of difficult airway during anesthesia induction in obese patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective, double-blind, observational study was conducted at Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between March 2020 and March 2022. A total of 157 patients age ≥ 18 (BMI ≥ 30 kg.m<sup>-2</sup>), without previous head and neck surgery were included in the study. Anterior cervical soft tissue measurements were performed at three levels; minimum distance between the hyoid bone and skin at the level of the hyoid bone; (DSHB), distance between the midpoint of the epiglottis and skin at the level of the thyrohyoid membrane; (DSE), distance between the anterior commissure of vocal cords and skin at the vocal cord level; (DSV). The Han scale was used to assess difficult mask ventilation and the Cormack-Lehane scale was used to assess difficult laryngoscopy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the difficult laryngoscopy group, the mean values of DSHB, DSE and DSV were 18.5 ± 3.5, 18.3 ± 3.8, and 18.6 ± 3.4, respectively. The AUC values for DSHB, DSE, and DSV were 0.845, 0.827, and 0.850, respectively. Anterior cervical measurements showed a better predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy compared to difficult mask ventilation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Ultrasonographic measurements were predictive for difficult laryngoscopy and ventilation with better correlation in laryngoscopy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000617/pdfft?md5=1445ea1d75c66de18707cb5017702d61&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000617-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Difficult airway, characterized by difficult mask ventilation and intubation, is common in obese patients undergoing surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic efficiency of ultrasound-measured anterior cervical soft tissue parameters as an indicator of difficult airway during anesthesia induction in obese patients.

Methods

This prospective, double-blind, observational study was conducted at Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between March 2020 and March 2022. A total of 157 patients age ≥ 18 (BMI ≥ 30 kg.m-2), without previous head and neck surgery were included in the study. Anterior cervical soft tissue measurements were performed at three levels; minimum distance between the hyoid bone and skin at the level of the hyoid bone; (DSHB), distance between the midpoint of the epiglottis and skin at the level of the thyrohyoid membrane; (DSE), distance between the anterior commissure of vocal cords and skin at the vocal cord level; (DSV). The Han scale was used to assess difficult mask ventilation and the Cormack-Lehane scale was used to assess difficult laryngoscopy.

Results

In the difficult laryngoscopy group, the mean values of DSHB, DSE and DSV were 18.5 ± 3.5, 18.3 ± 3.8, and 18.6 ± 3.4, respectively. The AUC values for DSHB, DSE, and DSV were 0.845, 0.827, and 0.850, respectively. Anterior cervical measurements showed a better predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy compared to difficult mask ventilation.

Conclusion

Ultrasonographic measurements were predictive for difficult laryngoscopy and ventilation with better correlation in laryngoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖患者的超声气道评估是预测困难气道的重要工具:一项观察性研究。
背景:气道困难是接受手术的肥胖患者的常见病,其特征是面罩通气和插管困难。本研究旨在评估和比较超声测量的颈前软组织参数作为肥胖患者麻醉诱导期间气道困难指标的预后效果:这项前瞻性、双盲、观察性研究于 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在巴利克赛尔大学医学院附属医院进行。研究共纳入 157 名年龄≥ 18 岁(体重指数≥ 30 kg.m-2)、既往未接受过头颈部手术的患者。颈前软组织测量在三个层面进行:舌骨与舌骨水平皮肤之间的最小距离(DSHB)、会厌中点与甲状舌骨膜水平皮肤之间的距离(DSE)、声带前会厌与声带水平皮肤之间的距离(DSV)。采用 Han 量表评估喉罩通气困难程度,采用 Cormack-Lehane 量表评估喉镜检查困难程度:结果:在喉镜检查困难组,DSHB、DSE 和 DSV 的平均值分别为 18.5 ± 3.5、18.3 ± 3.8 和 18.6 ± 3.4。DSHB、DSE 和 DSV 的 AUC 值分别为 0.845、0.827 和 0.850。与喉罩通气困难相比,颈前测量对喉镜检查困难的预测价值更高:结论:超声波测量可预测喉镜检查和通气困难,喉镜检查的相关性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes? Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1