Pub Date : 2024-11-24DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844575
Layana Vieira Nobre , Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro , Juscelino Afonso de Oliveira Júnior , Vitória Luiza Locatelli Winkeler , Luis Flávio França Vinhosa Muniz , Hiago Parreão Braga , Plínio da Cunha Leal
Background
Rebound pain is believed to involve both nociceptive pain due to insufficient analgesia and hyperalgesia induced by regional anesthesia. Adjuvant's addition could prevent rebound pain. This study aimed to determine if the addition of dexamethasone or clonidine to local anesthetic when performing interscalene block could prevent rebound pain.
Methods
This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel grouping, randomized clinical trial conducted with patients receiving a single injection of bupivacaine 0.375% in interscalene block ultrasound guided and general anesthesia for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to either no additives (control), clonidine (30 mcg), or dexamethasone (4 mg). The primary outcome was rebound pain, defined as sudden onset of pain, moderate to severe intensity (VAS ≥7) without improvement with oral medication, followed by VAS pain at rest, required rescue analgesia, the occurrence of adverse events or complications, and satisfaction survey assessments between groups. Rebound pain and pain at rest were assessed 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure.
Results
The incidence of rebound pain was not statistically different between groups (p-value = 0.22), with an observed incidence of 41.2% (95% CI 25.9‒57.9), 28.6% (95% CI 16.7‒43.3), and 23.3% (95% CI 12.6‒37.6) in the control, dexamethasone, and clonidine groups, respectively. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the groups in time, from anesthetic blockade to first complaint of pain or the severity of postoperative pain.
Conclusion
The administration of dexamethasone or clonidine as perineural adjuncts to local anesthesia in single-injection interscalene blocks did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain.
背景:反跳痛被认为包括镇痛不足引起的痛觉疼痛和区域麻醉引起的痛觉减退。添加辅助剂可预防反跳痛。本研究旨在确定在进行椎间孔阻滞时,在局麻药中添加地塞米松或氯硝西泮能否预防反跳痛:这是一项多中心、前瞻性、平行分组、随机临床试验,研究对象是在超声引导下接受椎间阻滞单次注射 0.375% 布比卡因和肩部手术全身麻醉的患者,他们被随机分配到无添加剂(对照组)、氯尼丁(30 微克)或地塞米松(4 毫克)组。主要结果是反跳痛,其定义为突然发作的疼痛、中度至重度疼痛(VAS ≥7)且口服药物后疼痛无改善,其次是休息时的 VAS 疼痛、所需的解救性镇痛、不良事件或并发症的发生以及组间满意度调查评估。术后2、4、6、12、24和48小时对反跳痛和休息时疼痛进行评估:对照组、地塞米松组和氯尼替丁组的反跳痛发生率分别为 41.2% (95% CI 25.9-57.9)、28.6% (95% CI 16.7-43.3) 和 23.3% (95% CI 12.6-37.6),组间无统计学差异(P 值 = 0.22)。此外,从麻醉阻滞到首次出现疼痛症状的时间或术后疼痛的严重程度在各组之间没有明显差异:结论:使用地塞米松或氯尼丁作为局部麻醉的硬膜外辅助用药进行单次椎间孔阻滞并不能显著降低反跳痛的发生率。
{"title":"Efficacy of dexamethasone or clonidine as adjuvants in interscalene brachial plexus block for preventing rebound pain after shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Layana Vieira Nobre , Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro , Juscelino Afonso de Oliveira Júnior , Vitória Luiza Locatelli Winkeler , Luis Flávio França Vinhosa Muniz , Hiago Parreão Braga , Plínio da Cunha Leal","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844575","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844575","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rebound pain is believed to involve both nociceptive pain due to insufficient analgesia and hyperalgesia induced by regional anesthesia. Adjuvant's addition could prevent rebound pain. This study aimed to determine if the addition of dexamethasone or clonidine to local anesthetic when performing interscalene block could prevent rebound pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel grouping, randomized clinical trial conducted with patients receiving a single injection of bupivacaine 0.375% in interscalene block ultrasound guided and general anesthesia for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to either no additives (control), clonidine (30 mcg), or dexamethasone (4 mg). The primary outcome was rebound pain, defined as sudden onset of pain, moderate to severe intensity (VAS ≥7) without improvement with oral medication, followed by VAS pain at rest, required rescue analgesia, the occurrence of adverse events or complications, and satisfaction survey assessments between groups. Rebound pain and pain at rest were assessed 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of rebound pain was not statistically different between groups (p-value = 0.22), with an observed incidence of 41.2% (95% CI 25.9‒57.9), 28.6% (95% CI 16.7‒43.3), and 23.3% (95% CI 12.6‒37.6) in the control, dexamethasone, and clonidine groups, respectively. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the groups in time, from anesthetic blockade to first complaint of pain or the severity of postoperative pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The administration of dexamethasone or clonidine as perineural adjuncts to local anesthesia in single-injection interscalene blocks did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844574
Luis Eduardo Ciconini , Theodoro Beck , Catreen Abouelsaad , Karandip Bains , Mauren F. Carbonar
Introduction
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks (ISBPB) are highly effective forms of anesthesia for surgeries involving the upper arm, shoulder, and neck. Recently, there has been a growing interest in comparing the advantages and limitations of the anterior and posterior approaches.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the anterior or posterior approach to ISBPB offers a clinical advantage regarding complete block rates and time to block completion. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the anterior and posterior techniques for ISBPB while excluding studies with overlapping populations, comparisons of blocks other than interscalene, and articles written in a non-English language.
Results
The search strategy identified 2229 articles, of which six Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A total of 414 patients were included, with 210 patients in the anterior group and 204 in the posterior group. The Odds Ratio (OR) for a complete sensory block between the two techniques did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.56 [0.20, 1.58], 95% CI, p = 0.27). Similarly, the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for the time to complete the block also did not reach statistical significance (SMD: -0.77 [-2.12, 0.59], 95% CI, p = 0.27). Heterogeneity for complete block was not significant (I2 = 0%), while procedure time showed high heterogeneity (I2 = 97%).
Conclusion
Both techniques have shown effectiveness in providing surgical analgesia. The choice of technique should be determined by the provider's comfort and proficiency, as well as ensuring the highest level of safety for the patient.
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of anterior and posterior approaches for interscalene brachial plexus block: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Luis Eduardo Ciconini , Theodoro Beck , Catreen Abouelsaad , Karandip Bains , Mauren F. Carbonar","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844574","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844574","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks (ISBPB) are highly effective forms of anesthesia for surgeries involving the upper arm, shoulder, and neck. Recently, there has been a growing interest in comparing the advantages and limitations of the anterior and posterior approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the anterior or posterior approach to ISBPB offers a clinical advantage regarding complete block rates and time to block completion. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the anterior and posterior techniques for ISBPB while excluding studies with overlapping populations, comparisons of blocks other than interscalene, and articles written in a non-English language.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search strategy identified 2229 articles, of which six Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A total of 414 patients were included, with 210 patients in the anterior group and 204 in the posterior group. The Odds Ratio (OR) for a complete sensory block between the two techniques did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.56 [0.20, 1.58], 95% CI, p = 0.27). Similarly, the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) for the time to complete the block also did not reach statistical significance (SMD: -0.77 [-2.12, 0.59], 95% CI, p = 0.27). Heterogeneity for complete block was not significant (I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), while procedure time showed high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 97%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both techniques have shown effectiveness in providing surgical analgesia. The choice of technique should be determined by the provider's comfort and proficiency, as well as ensuring the highest level of safety for the patient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844567
Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Júnior , Larissa Bianchini , Jakeline Neves Giovanetti , Luiz Marcelo Almeida de Araújo , Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa dos Santos , Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen , Marcelo Park
Background
Infection diagnosis in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) is a challenge given the spectrum of conditions that present with systemic inflammation, the illness severity and the delay and imprecision of existing diagnostic methods. We hence sought to analyze the prevalence and predictors of confirmed infection after empirical antimicrobials during ICU stay.
Methods
retrospective cohort of prospectively collected ICU data in an academic tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We included all adult patients given a new empirical antimicrobial during their ICU stay. We excluded patients using prophylactic or microbiologically guided antimicrobials. Primary outcome was infection status, defined as confirmed, probable, possible, or discarded. In a multivariable analysis, we explored variables associated with confirmed infection.
Results
After screening 1721 patients admitted to the ICU from November 2017 to November 2022, we identified 398 new antimicrobial prescriptions in 341 patients. After exclusions, 243 antimicrobial prescriptions for 206 patients were included. Infection was classified as confirmed in 61 (25.1%) prescriptions, probable in 39 (16.0%), possible in 103 (42.4%), and discarded in 40 (16.5%). The only factor associated with infection was deltaSOFA (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36, p = 0.022).
Conclusion
Suspected infection in the ICU is frequently not confirmed. Clinicians should be aware of the need to avoid premature closure and revise diagnosis after microbiological results. Development and implementation of new tools for faster infection diagnosis and guiding of antimicrobial prescription should be a research priority.
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of confirmed infection in patients receiving empiric antimicrobials in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Luis Carlos Maia Cardozo Júnior , Larissa Bianchini , Jakeline Neves Giovanetti , Luiz Marcelo Almeida de Araújo , Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa dos Santos , Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen , Marcelo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infection diagnosis in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) is a challenge given the spectrum of conditions that present with systemic inflammation, the illness severity and the delay and imprecision of existing diagnostic methods. We hence sought to analyze the prevalence and predictors of confirmed infection after empirical antimicrobials during ICU stay.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>retrospective cohort of prospectively collected ICU data in an academic tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We included all adult patients given a new empirical antimicrobial during their ICU stay. We excluded patients using prophylactic or microbiologically guided antimicrobials. Primary outcome was infection status, defined as confirmed, probable, possible, or discarded. In a multivariable analysis, we explored variables associated with confirmed infection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After screening 1721 patients admitted to the ICU from November 2017 to November 2022, we identified 398 new antimicrobial prescriptions in 341 patients. After exclusions, 243 antimicrobial prescriptions for 206 patients were included. Infection was classified as confirmed in 61 (25.1%) prescriptions, probable in 39 (16.0%), possible in 103 (42.4%), and discarded in 40 (16.5%). The only factor associated with infection was deltaSOFA (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36, p = 0.022).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Suspected infection in the ICU is frequently not confirmed. Clinicians should be aware of the need to avoid premature closure and revise diagnosis after microbiological results. Development and implementation of new tools for faster infection diagnosis and guiding of antimicrobial prescription should be a research priority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142514001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844565
Gustavo R.M. Wegner , Bruno F.M. Wegner , Henrik G. Oliveira , Luis A. Costa , Luigi W. Spagnol , Valentine W. Spagnol , Gilberto T.F. de Oliveira Filho
Background
Emergence agitation is a common complication after nasal surgeries, marked by increased agitation and a heightened risk of injuries. Factors like urinary catheter, endotracheal tube, postoperative pain, and younger age contribute to its occurrence. Due to the variety of preventive approaches reported in the literature, a network meta-analysis is essential.
Methods
This systematic review employs a network meta-analysis design, following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA-NMA criteria. Inclusion criteria involve randomized controlled studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing emergence agitation in nasal surgeries. Electronic searches, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, without language or date restrictions, were conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, and data extraction was performed using standardized tables. Bayesian NMA, MetaInsight web app, and Cochrane Foundation Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were applied for data analysis and bias assessment.
Results
After a rigorous selection process, 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing 2,122 patients and 14 interventions were included. The best ranked treatments identified were intraoperative dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg-1 for 10 minutes as a bolus, followed by 0.4 μg.kg-1.h-1), bilateral nasociliary and maxillary nerve block, ketamine (0.5 mg.kg-1 administered 20 minutes before the end of surgery), nasal compression for 40 minutes before anesthesia induction, and suction above the cuff of the endotracheal tube.
Conclusions
Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions emerged as effective strategies in mitigating emergence agitation after nasal surgeries, offering clinicians valuable options for improving postoperative outcomes in this patient population.
{"title":"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in patients undergoing nasal surgeries for prevention of emergence agitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Gustavo R.M. Wegner , Bruno F.M. Wegner , Henrik G. Oliveira , Luis A. Costa , Luigi W. Spagnol , Valentine W. Spagnol , Gilberto T.F. de Oliveira Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergence agitation is a common complication after nasal surgeries, marked by increased agitation and a heightened risk of injuries. Factors like urinary catheter, endotracheal tube, postoperative pain, and younger age contribute to its occurrence. Due to the variety of preventive approaches reported in the literature, a network meta-analysis is essential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review employs a network meta-analysis design, following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA-NMA criteria. Inclusion criteria involve randomized controlled studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing emergence agitation in nasal surgeries. Electronic searches, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, without language or date restrictions, were conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, and data extraction was performed using standardized tables. Bayesian NMA, MetaInsight web app, and Cochrane Foundation Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were applied for data analysis and bias assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After a rigorous selection process, 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing 2,122 patients and 14 interventions were included. The best ranked treatments identified were intraoperative dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg-<sup>1</sup> for 10 minutes as a bolus, followed by 0.4 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup>), bilateral nasociliary and maxillary nerve block, ketamine (0.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> administered 20 minutes before the end of surgery), nasal compression for 40 minutes before anesthesia induction, and suction above the cuff of the endotracheal tube.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions emerged as effective strategies in mitigating emergence agitation after nasal surgeries, offering clinicians valuable options for improving postoperative outcomes in this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844566
Matthanja Bieze , Amir Zabida , Eduarda Schutz Martinelli , Rebecca Caragata , Stella Wang , Jo Carroll , Markus Selzner , Stuart A McCluskey
Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) following Liver Transplantation (LT) is associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stay, increased risk of chronic renal disease, and decreased graft survival. Intraoperative hypotension is a modifiable risk factor associated with postoperative AKI. We aimed to determine in which phase of LT hypotension has the strongest association with AKI: the anhepatic or neohepatic phase.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing LT between January 2010 and June 2022. Exclusion criteria were re-do or combined transplantations, preoperative dialysis, and early graft failure or death. Primary outcome was AKI as defined by KDIGO. Hypotension was Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) below predefined thresholds in minutes. Risk adjusted logistic regression analysis considered hypotension in 3 periods: the total procedure, anhepatic phase, and neohepatic phase.
Results
Our cohort included 1153 patients. The median MELD-NA score was 19 (IQR 11–28), and 412 (35.9%) were living-related donations. AKI occurred in 544 patients (47.2%). The unadjusted model showed an association with AKI for MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.011 [1.0, 1.022], p = 0.047) and MAP < 55 mmHg (OR = 1.023 [1.002, 1.047], p = 0.040) in the anhepatic phase, and for MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.032 [1.01, 1.056], p = 0.006) in the neohepatic phase. The adjusted model did not reach significance in the subgroups but did in the total procedure: MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.005 [1.002, 1.008], p < 0.001) and MAP < 55 mmHg (OR = 1.008 [1.003–1.013], p = 0.004).
Conclusion
Intraoperative hypotension is independently associated with AKI following LT. This association is seen during the anhepatic phase. Maintaining MAP above 60 mmHg may improve kidney function after LT.
{"title":"Intraoperative hypotension during critical phases of liver transplantation and its impact on acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Matthanja Bieze , Amir Zabida , Eduarda Schutz Martinelli , Rebecca Caragata , Stella Wang , Jo Carroll , Markus Selzner , Stuart A McCluskey","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) following Liver Transplantation (LT) is associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stay, increased risk of chronic renal disease, and decreased graft survival. Intraoperative hypotension is a modifiable risk factor associated with postoperative AKI. We aimed to determine in which phase of LT hypotension has the strongest association with AKI: the anhepatic or neohepatic phase.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing LT between January 2010 and June 2022. Exclusion criteria were re-do or combined transplantations, preoperative dialysis, and early graft failure or death. Primary outcome was AKI as defined by KDIGO. Hypotension was Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) below predefined thresholds in minutes. Risk adjusted logistic regression analysis considered hypotension in 3 periods: the total procedure, anhepatic phase, and neohepatic phase.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our cohort included 1153 patients. The median MELD-NA score was 19 (IQR 11–28), and 412 (35.9%) were living-related donations. AKI occurred in 544 patients (47.2%). The unadjusted model showed an association with AKI for MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.011 [1.0, 1.022], <em>p</em> = 0.047) and MAP < 55 mmHg (OR = 1.023 [1.002, 1.047], <em>p</em> = 0.040) in the anhepatic phase, and for MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.032 [1.01, 1.056], <em>p</em> = 0.006) in the neohepatic phase. The adjusted model did not reach significance in the subgroups but did in the total procedure: MAP < 60 mmHg (OR = 1.005 [1.002, 1.008], <em>p</em> < 0.001) and MAP < 55 mmHg (OR = 1.008 [1.003–1.013], <em>p</em> = 0.004).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Intraoperative hypotension is independently associated with AKI following LT. This association is seen during the anhepatic phase. Maintaining MAP above 60 mmHg may improve kidney function after LT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"74 6","pages":"Article 844566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142482241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563
Maged Y. Argalious , Sven Halvorson , John Seif , Sandeep Khanna , Mi Wang , Jacek B. Cywinski
Background
Superior Vena Cava (SVC) diameter and collapsibility index, dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, have been successfully utilized as echocardiographic indices for fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Whether these measurements are correlated with Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurements in liver transplant patients is unknown. We sought to assess the correlation of maximum and minimum SVC diameter and SVC collapsibility index measurements obtained intraoperatively by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) with those of simultaneously recorded CVP measurements obtained through a right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between SVC measurements and simultaneously obtained thermodilution cardiac index measurements.
Methods
Single center prospective observational trial of patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in an academic tertiary care center.
Results
The minimum SVC exhibited a mild significant correlation with CVP as did the maximum SVC. The correlation between the SVC collapsibility index and CVP was not significantly different from zero. In our secondary analysis, the correlation between minimum SVC diameter and cardiac index was determined to be weak but non-zero as was the correlation between the maximum SVC diameter and cardiac index. The correlation between SVC collapsibility index and cardiac index was not different from zero.
Conclusion
While statistically significant, the weak clinical correlation of intraoperative SVC measurements obtained by TEE make them unsuitable as a replacement for central venous pressure or thermodilution cardiac index measurements in liver transplant recipients.
{"title":"Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study","authors":"Maged Y. Argalious , Sven Halvorson , John Seif , Sandeep Khanna , Mi Wang , Jacek B. Cywinski","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Superior Vena Cava (SVC) diameter and collapsibility index, dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, have been successfully utilized as echocardiographic indices for fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Whether these measurements are correlated with Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurements in liver transplant patients is unknown. We sought to assess the correlation of maximum and minimum SVC diameter and SVC collapsibility index measurements obtained intraoperatively by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) with those of simultaneously recorded CVP measurements obtained through a right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between SVC measurements and simultaneously obtained thermodilution cardiac index measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single center prospective observational trial of patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in an academic tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The minimum SVC exhibited a mild significant correlation with CVP as did the maximum SVC. The correlation between the SVC collapsibility index and CVP was not significantly different from zero. In our secondary analysis, the correlation between minimum SVC diameter and cardiac index was determined to be weak but non-zero as was the correlation between the maximum SVC diameter and cardiac index. The correlation between SVC collapsibility index and cardiac index was not different from zero.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While statistically significant, the weak clinical correlation of intraoperative SVC measurements obtained by TEE make them unsuitable as a replacement for central venous pressure or thermodilution cardiac index measurements in liver transplant recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"74 6","pages":"Article 844563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-26DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844562
Eduarda S. Martinelli , Stuart A. McCluskey , Keyvan Karkouti , Carla A. Luzzi , Matthanja Bieze , Luiz Marcelo S. Malbouisson , André P. Schmidt
{"title":"The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes?","authors":"Eduarda S. Martinelli , Stuart A. McCluskey , Keyvan Karkouti , Carla A. Luzzi , Matthanja Bieze , Luiz Marcelo S. Malbouisson , André P. Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844562","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"74 6","pages":"Article 844562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142333572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-19DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844561
Milena Vasconcelos Falcão, João Nogueira Neto, Ed Carlos Rey Moura, Caio Márcio Barros Oliveira, Rodrigo Pinto Diniz, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Plínio da Cunha Leal
{"title":"Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial","authors":"Milena Vasconcelos Falcão, João Nogueira Neto, Ed Carlos Rey Moura, Caio Márcio Barros Oliveira, Rodrigo Pinto Diniz, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho, Plínio da Cunha Leal","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844560
Yiru Wang , Kaizheng Chen , Min Ye, Xia Shen
Background
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common, transient postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. The relationship between POD and intraoperative hypotension remains unclear. This study aims to determine if intraoperative hypotension predicts POD in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy.
Methods
This study included male patients over 65 years old who underwent laryngectomy between April 2018 and January 2022. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to diagnose delirium. Intraoperative hypotension was defined as a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) during surgery that was less than 30% of the preoperative level for at least 30 minutes. The relationship between intraoperative hypotension and POD incidence was adjusted for patient demographics and surgery-related factors.
Results
Out of 428 male patients, 77 (18.0%) developed POD, and 166 (38.8%) experienced intraoperative hypotension. Surgery duration ≥ 300 minutes (OR = 1.873, 95% CI 1.041–3.241, p = 0.036), intraoperative hypotension (OR = 1.739, 95% CI 1.039–2.912, p = 0.035), and schooling (OR = 2.655, 95% CI 1.338–5.268) were independent risk factors for POD. The association between intraoperative hypotension and POD was significantly influenced by surgery duration (p for interaction = 0.008), with a stronger association in prolonged surgeries (adjusted OR = 4.902; 95% CI 1.816–13.230).
Conclusions
Intraoperative hypotension and low education level are associated with an increased risk of POD in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy, especially with prolonged surgery duration.
背景术后谵妄(POD)是老年患者术后常见的短暂认知功能障碍。POD 与术中低血压之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定术中低血压是否可预测接受喉切除术的老年男性患者的 POD。方法本研究纳入了 2018 年 4 月至 2022 年 1 月间接受喉切除术的 65 岁以上男性患者。采用意识模糊评估法(CAM)诊断谵妄。术中低血压定义为手术期间平均动脉压(MAP)低于术前水平的30%,持续时间至少30分钟。根据患者人口统计学和手术相关因素调整了术中低血压与 POD 发生率之间的关系。手术时间≥300分钟(OR = 1.873,95% CI 1.041-3.241,P = 0.036)、术中低血压(OR = 1.739,95% CI 1.039-2.912,P = 0.035)和学龄(OR = 2.655,95% CI 1.338-5.268)是POD的独立风险因素。结论术中低血压和低教育水平与接受喉切除术的老年男性患者发生 POD 的风险增加有关,尤其是在手术时间较长的情况下。
{"title":"Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yiru Wang , Kaizheng Chen , Min Ye, Xia Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844560","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common, transient postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. The relationship between POD and intraoperative hypotension remains unclear. This study aims to determine if intraoperative hypotension predicts POD in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included male patients over 65 years old who underwent laryngectomy between April 2018 and January 2022. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to diagnose delirium. Intraoperative hypotension was defined as a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) during surgery that was less than 30% of the preoperative level for at least 30 minutes. The relationship between intraoperative hypotension and POD incidence was adjusted for patient demographics and surgery-related factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 428 male patients, 77 (18.0%) developed POD, and 166 (38.8%) experienced intraoperative hypotension. Surgery duration ≥ 300 minutes (OR = 1.873, 95% CI 1.041–3.241, <em>p</em> = 0.036), intraoperative hypotension (OR = 1.739, 95% CI 1.039–2.912, <em>p</em> = 0.035), and schooling (OR = 2.655, 95% CI 1.338–5.268) were independent risk factors for POD. The association between intraoperative hypotension and POD was significantly influenced by surgery duration (<em>p</em> for interaction = 0.008), with a stronger association in prolonged surgeries (adjusted OR = 4.902; 95% CI 1.816–13.230).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative hypotension and low education level are associated with an increased risk of POD in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy, especially with prolonged surgery duration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000824/pdfft?md5=2c43dac3f5ea0851146aaa47a4586f7c&pid=1-s2.0-S0104001424000824-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142274605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-08DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844557
Joao Marcos Cansian , Angelo Zanin D'Angelo Giampaoli , Liege Caroline Immich , André Prato Schmidt , Andrei Sanson Dias
Background
This study compares dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine as potential adjuvants for spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine enhances sensory block and minimizes the need for pain medication, while buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid, exhibits a favorable safety profile compared to traditional opioids.
Methods
PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were systematically searched in December 2023. Eligibility criteria: RCTs with patients scheduled for lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgeries; undergoing spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine.
Results
Eight RCTs involving 604 patients were included. Compared with dexmedetomidine, buprenorphine significantly reduced time for sensory regression to S1 (Risk Ratio [RR = -131.28]; 95% CI -187.47 to -75.08; I2 = 99%) and motor block duration (RR = -118.58; 95% CI -170.08 to -67.09; I2 = 99%). Moreover, buprenorphine increased the onset time of sensory block (RR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.81; I2 = 93%) and increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.80 to 9.18; I² = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the duration of analgesia, onset time of motor block, time to achieve the highest sensory level, shivering, hypotension, or bradycardia.
Conclusions
The intrathecal administration of buprenorphine, when compared to dexmedetomidine, is linked to reduction in the duration of both sensory and motor blocks following spinal anesthesia. Conversely, buprenorphine was associated with an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a longer onset time of sensory block. Further high-quality RCTs are essential for a comprehensive understanding of buprenorphine's effects compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia.
背景:本研究比较了右美托咪定和丁丙诺啡作为脊髓麻醉的潜在辅助药物。右美托咪定能增强感觉阻滞,最大限度地减少对止痛药的需求,而丁丙诺啡作为一种长效阿片类药物,与传统阿片类药物相比具有良好的安全性:方法:2023 年 12 月对 PubMed、Cochrane 和 EMBASE 进行了系统检索:研究对象为计划接受下腹部、骨盆或下肢手术的患者;接受局部麻醉剂和丁丙诺啡或右美托咪定的脊髓麻醉:结果:共纳入了 8 项研究,涉及 604 名患者。与右美托咪定相比,丁丙诺啡可显著缩短感觉回退至 S1 的时间(风险比 [RR = -131.28]; 95% CI -187.47 to -75.08; I2 = 99%)和运动阻滞持续时间(RR = -118.58; 95% CI -170.08 to -67.09; I2 = 99%)。此外,丁丙诺啡增加了感觉阻滞的起始时间(RR = 0.42;95% CI 0.03 至 0.81;I2 = 93%),并增加了术后恶心和呕吐的发生率(RR = 4.06;95% CI 1.80 至 9.18;I² = 0%)。在镇痛持续时间、运动阻滞开始时间、达到最高感觉水平的时间、哆嗦、低血压或心动过缓方面未观察到明显差异:结论:与右美托咪定相比,鞘内注射丁丙诺啡可缩短脊髓麻醉后感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间。相反,丁丙诺啡会增加术后恶心和呕吐的风险,并延长感觉阻滞的开始时间。要全面了解丁丙诺啡与右美托咪定在脊髓麻醉中的效果比较,必须进一步进行高质量的研究性试验。
{"title":"The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Joao Marcos Cansian , Angelo Zanin D'Angelo Giampaoli , Liege Caroline Immich , André Prato Schmidt , Andrei Sanson Dias","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844557","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844557","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study compares dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine as potential adjuvants for spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine enhances sensory block and minimizes the need for pain medication, while buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid, exhibits a favorable safety profile compared to traditional opioids.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were systematically searched in December 2023. Eligibility criteria: RCTs with patients scheduled for lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgeries; undergoing spinal anesthesia with a local anesthetic and buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight RCTs involving 604 patients were included. Compared with dexmedetomidine, buprenorphine significantly reduced time for sensory regression to S1 (Risk Ratio [RR = -131.28]; 95% CI -187.47 to -75.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%) and motor block duration (RR = -118.58; 95% CI -170.08 to -67.09; I<sup>2</sup> = 99%). Moreover, buprenorphine increased the onset time of sensory block (RR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%) and increased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 4.06; 95% CI 1.80 to 9.18; I<sup>²</sup> = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the duration of analgesia, onset time of motor block, time to achieve the highest sensory level, shivering, hypotension, or bradycardia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The intrathecal administration of buprenorphine, when compared to dexmedetomidine, is linked to reduction in the duration of both sensory and motor blocks following spinal anesthesia. Conversely, buprenorphine was associated with an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a longer onset time of sensory block. Further high-quality RCTs are essential for a comprehensive understanding of buprenorphine's effects compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"74 6","pages":"Article 844557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}