Pharmacist roles in the medication use Process: Qualitative analysis of stakeholder perceptions

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American Pharmacists Association Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.japh.2024.102186
Eunhee Kim, Marcia M. Worley, Samantha Yum, Anandi V. Law
{"title":"Pharmacist roles in the medication use Process: Qualitative analysis of stakeholder perceptions","authors":"Eunhee Kim,&nbsp;Marcia M. Worley,&nbsp;Samantha Yum,&nbsp;Anandi V. Law","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pharmacist roles in the Medication Use Process (MUP) have advanced along with new healthcare delivery models and interprofessional collaborative practice. It is unclear whether stakeholder perceptions of pharmacist roles have evolved simultaneously.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Examine patient, pharmacist, and physician perceptions of pharmacist roles in the MUP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This institutional review board-approved study used a cross-sectional design with Qualtrics panels of patients, pharmacists, and physicians. Role Theory was used as a framework to develop 12-item surveys to study pharmacist role perceptions in the MUP: prescribing, transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring. Content analysis was performed on the responses to open-ended questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 1004 patients, a total of 7217 comments were obtained on 9 questions (740-1004 comments), resulting in an average of 802 comments per question or 0.8 comments per question per respondent (CQR). Similarly, 1620 comments from 205 pharmacists on 11 questions (121-205 comments) averaged 0.72 CQR; and 1561 comments from 200 physicians on 11 questions (136-200 comments) equated to 0.74 CQR. Content analysis revealed recurring themes across the stakeholders: “pharmacists,” “physicians,” “insurance,” “technology,” “collaboration,” “time,” “communication,” and “patient’s responsibility.” Some role congruence was seen regarding pharmacist roles by all 3 stakeholders; noting pharmacist roles in improving all steps of the MUP, except <em>transcribing</em>. Pharmacists highlighted professional challenges such as staffing issues, burnout, and competing demands; which were not acknowledged by patients and physicians indicating the need to increase awareness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed increased visibility and awareness of pharmacist roles in the MUP by all stakeholders, compared to previous research showing pharmacist roles limited to dispensing. Known barriers to pharmacy practice such as lack of provider status and reimbursement were not reported by any of the stakeholders in this study. There is a need to continuously inform stakeholders about pharmacists’ expanding roles in the MUP through advocacy and marketing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 102186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124002061/pdfft?md5=76605327120622d4e76ef7a316cca0b1&pid=1-s2.0-S1544319124002061-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124002061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pharmacist roles in the Medication Use Process (MUP) have advanced along with new healthcare delivery models and interprofessional collaborative practice. It is unclear whether stakeholder perceptions of pharmacist roles have evolved simultaneously.

Objectives

Examine patient, pharmacist, and physician perceptions of pharmacist roles in the MUP.

Methods

This institutional review board-approved study used a cross-sectional design with Qualtrics panels of patients, pharmacists, and physicians. Role Theory was used as a framework to develop 12-item surveys to study pharmacist role perceptions in the MUP: prescribing, transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring. Content analysis was performed on the responses to open-ended questions.

Results

From 1004 patients, a total of 7217 comments were obtained on 9 questions (740-1004 comments), resulting in an average of 802 comments per question or 0.8 comments per question per respondent (CQR). Similarly, 1620 comments from 205 pharmacists on 11 questions (121-205 comments) averaged 0.72 CQR; and 1561 comments from 200 physicians on 11 questions (136-200 comments) equated to 0.74 CQR. Content analysis revealed recurring themes across the stakeholders: “pharmacists,” “physicians,” “insurance,” “technology,” “collaboration,” “time,” “communication,” and “patient’s responsibility.” Some role congruence was seen regarding pharmacist roles by all 3 stakeholders; noting pharmacist roles in improving all steps of the MUP, except transcribing. Pharmacists highlighted professional challenges such as staffing issues, burnout, and competing demands; which were not acknowledged by patients and physicians indicating the need to increase awareness.

Conclusion

This study showed increased visibility and awareness of pharmacist roles in the MUP by all stakeholders, compared to previous research showing pharmacist roles limited to dispensing. Known barriers to pharmacy practice such as lack of provider status and reimbursement were not reported by any of the stakeholders in this study. There is a need to continuously inform stakeholders about pharmacists’ expanding roles in the MUP through advocacy and marketing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师在药物使用过程中的作用:利益相关者看法的定性分析。
背景:药剂师在药物使用过程(MUP)中的角色随着新的医疗保健服务模式和跨专业合作实践的发展而不断进步。目前尚不清楚利益相关者对药剂师角色的看法是否也在同步发展:研究患者、药剂师和医生对药剂师在 MUP 中角色的看法:这项经 IRB 批准的研究采用横断面设计,通过 Qualtrics 小组对患者、药剂师和医生进行调查。以角色理论为框架,开发了 12 个项目的调查问卷,研究药剂师在医保中的角色认知:处方、转录、配药、管理和监控。对开放式问题的回答进行了内容分析:在 1004 名患者中,共有 7217 人对 9 个问题发表了意见(740-1004 条意见),平均每个问题有 802 条意见,即每个受访者对每个问题发表 0.8 条意见(CQR)。同样,205 名药剂师就 11 个问题(121-205 条评论)发表了 1620 条评论,平均每条评论的 CQR 为 0.72;200 名医生就 11 个问题(136-200 条评论)发表了 1561 条评论,平均每条评论的 CQR 为 0.74。内容分析揭示了利益相关者之间反复出现的主题:"药剂师"、"医生"、"保险"、"技术"、"合作"、"时间"、"沟通 "和 "患者责任"。所有 3 位利益相关者都认为药剂师的角色具有一定的一致性;他们注意到药剂师在改进 MUP 所有步骤(除转录外)中的作用。药剂师强调了职业挑战,如人员配备问题、职业倦怠和相互竞争的需求;而患者和医生并未认识到这一点,这表明有必要提高对药剂师的认识:这项研究表明,与以往研究显示药剂师的作用仅限于配药相比,所有利益相关者对药剂师在医保中的作用都有了更多的了解和认识。在这项研究中,所有利益相关者都没有提到药剂师执业的已知障碍,如缺乏提供者地位和报销问题。有必要通过宣传和营销,不断向利益相关者介绍药剂师在医保中不断扩大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Implementing a Telemedicine-led Heart Failure Medication Regimen Optimization Clinic in Medically Underserved Heart Failure Populations. Exploring the pharmacist role in insomnia management and care provision: A scoping review. Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Older Adults: Incidence and Risk Factors Related to Patient Characteristics and Initial Opioid Dispensed. Pharmacists Enhance National Security through Medical Countermeasure Program Leadership. Barriers to and Facilitators of Buprenorphine Dispensing for Opioid Use Disorder: Evidence from Focus Groups in Appalachian Kentucky.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1