Expression of wound healing markers in gingival crevicular fluid following root-coverage procedures: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Archives of oral biology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106035
Vikender Singh Yadav , Kanika Makker , Nitesh Tewari , Nitika Monga , Rajiv Balachandran , Ujjal Kumar Bhawal , Ajay Mahajan
{"title":"Expression of wound healing markers in gingival crevicular fluid following root-coverage procedures: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Vikender Singh Yadav ,&nbsp;Kanika Makker ,&nbsp;Nitesh Tewari ,&nbsp;Nitika Monga ,&nbsp;Rajiv Balachandran ,&nbsp;Ujjal Kumar Bhawal ,&nbsp;Ajay Mahajan","doi":"10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.106035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Although several surgical techniques have been developed for treatment of gingival recession (GR), the underlying wound healing process remains relatively unexplored. This systematic review aimed to investigate the expression of wound healing markers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) before and after surgical treatment of GR.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting changes in the expression of GCF markers following any root coverage surgical procedure were identified from 4 electronic databases and manual searches followed by data extraction and result synthesis. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Overall certainty of evidence was summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four RCTs comprising 100 patients and investigating 15 biomarkers were included. Post-surgery, GCF levels of cytokines and inflammatory proteins were raised during the first 2–10 days of healing. MMP-8 levels increased during the first week followed by a gradual decline. RoB was found to be high for all studies and the overall certainty of evidence was very low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A limited number of studies with large methodological variations precluded reliable conclusions. Well-designed studies powered for GCF markers’ levels that follow a standardized protocol for GCF sampling and processing are needed to draw conclusive evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8288,"journal":{"name":"Archives of oral biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of oral biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003996924001560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Although several surgical techniques have been developed for treatment of gingival recession (GR), the underlying wound healing process remains relatively unexplored. This systematic review aimed to investigate the expression of wound healing markers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) before and after surgical treatment of GR.

Design

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting changes in the expression of GCF markers following any root coverage surgical procedure were identified from 4 electronic databases and manual searches followed by data extraction and result synthesis. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Overall certainty of evidence was summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.

Results

Four RCTs comprising 100 patients and investigating 15 biomarkers were included. Post-surgery, GCF levels of cytokines and inflammatory proteins were raised during the first 2–10 days of healing. MMP-8 levels increased during the first week followed by a gradual decline. RoB was found to be high for all studies and the overall certainty of evidence was very low.

Conclusion

A limited number of studies with large methodological variations precluded reliable conclusions. Well-designed studies powered for GCF markers’ levels that follow a standardized protocol for GCF sampling and processing are needed to draw conclusive evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙根覆盖术后牙龈缝液中伤口愈合标记物的表达:随机临床试验的系统回顾。
目的:尽管目前已开发出多种手术技术来治疗牙龈退缩(GR),但伤口愈合的基本过程仍相对缺乏研究。本系统综述旨在研究手术治疗牙龈退缩前后龈沟液(GCF)中伤口愈合标记物的表达:设计:从 4 个电子数据库中找到了报告任何牙根覆盖手术后 GCF 标记表达变化的随机临床试验 (RCT),并进行人工检索,然后提取数据并进行结果综合。使用 Cochrane RoB 2.0 工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具对证据的总体确定性进行总结:结果:共纳入了四项研究,包括 100 名患者和 15 个生物标志物。手术后,细胞因子和炎症蛋白的 GCF 水平在愈合的最初 2-10 天内升高。MMP-8 水平在第一周上升,随后逐渐下降。所有研究的RoB都很高,证据的总体确定性很低:结论:研究数量有限,方法差异较大,因此无法得出可靠的结论。要想获得确凿证据,需要进行设计良好的研究,对 GCF 标记物的水平进行检测,并遵循标准化的 GCF 采样和处理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of oral biology
Archives of oral biology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Oral Biology is an international journal which aims to publish papers of the highest scientific quality in the oral and craniofacial sciences. The journal is particularly interested in research which advances knowledge in the mechanisms of craniofacial development and disease, including: Cell and molecular biology Molecular genetics Immunology Pathogenesis Cellular microbiology Embryology Syndromology Forensic dentistry
期刊最新文献
Effects of loxoprofen on impaired water-evoked swallows in a pharyngitis rat model Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced autophagy exacerbates abnormal lung homeostasis: An in vivo and in vitro study Acidic/abrasive challenges on simulated non-carious cervical lesions development and morphology Effects of quercetin on mineralized dental tissues: A scoping review Allyl isothiocyanate suppressed periodontal tissue destruction in mice via bacteriostatic and anti-inflammatory activities against Porphyromonas gingivalis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1