Clinical effects of perineural dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105355
Federica Alessandra Brioschi , Vanessa Rabbogliatti , Luigi Auletta , Giuliano Ravasio , Martina Amari , Luigi Elia , Ilaria Gritti , Francesco Ferrari
{"title":"Clinical effects of perineural dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy","authors":"Federica Alessandra Brioschi ,&nbsp;Vanessa Rabbogliatti ,&nbsp;Luigi Auletta ,&nbsp;Giuliano Ravasio ,&nbsp;Martina Amari ,&nbsp;Luigi Elia ,&nbsp;Ilaria Gritti ,&nbsp;Francesco Ferrari","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study aimed to compare the quality of perioperative analgesia, the motor block duration, and the effects on main cardiovascular parameters of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg/nerve block) or magnesium sulphate (2 mg/kg/nerve block) as adjuvants to 0.3% ropivacaine for sciatic and saphenous nerves block in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). Dogs randomly received perineural dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (D group), magnesium sulphate-ropivacaine (M group), or ropivacaine (C group). Fentanyl was administered in case of intraoperative nociception. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Short Form-Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (SF-GCMPS) and VAS scale. The duration of motor blockade and intra- and postoperative cardiovascular parameters were also recorded. Group M required significantly more fentanyl than D group (<em>p</em> = 0.04). Group M had a significantly higher SF-GCMPS score than group C at 4 (<em>p</em> = 0.002) and 5 h after extubation (<em>p</em> = 0.01), and a significantly higher VAS score than group D at 3 h after extubation (<em>p</em> = 0.03), and at 4 h if compared to group C (<em>p</em> = 0.009). No significant differences regarding the duration of motor blockade were detected between groups (<em>p</em> = 0.07). The heart rate was significantly lower in group D than in M and C groups intraoperatively and during the first 1.5 h post extubation. The addition of dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to perineural ropivacaine did not improve the quality of perioperative analgesia and did not prolong the motor blockade in dogs undergoing sciatic and saphenous nerves block for TPLO surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 105355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002212/pdfft?md5=d7e958cf5bf2a13d91779652624651e9&pid=1-s2.0-S0034528824002212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528824002212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the quality of perioperative analgesia, the motor block duration, and the effects on main cardiovascular parameters of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg/nerve block) or magnesium sulphate (2 mg/kg/nerve block) as adjuvants to 0.3% ropivacaine for sciatic and saphenous nerves block in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). Dogs randomly received perineural dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (D group), magnesium sulphate-ropivacaine (M group), or ropivacaine (C group). Fentanyl was administered in case of intraoperative nociception. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Short Form-Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (SF-GCMPS) and VAS scale. The duration of motor blockade and intra- and postoperative cardiovascular parameters were also recorded. Group M required significantly more fentanyl than D group (p = 0.04). Group M had a significantly higher SF-GCMPS score than group C at 4 (p = 0.002) and 5 h after extubation (p = 0.01), and a significantly higher VAS score than group D at 3 h after extubation (p = 0.03), and at 4 h if compared to group C (p = 0.009). No significant differences regarding the duration of motor blockade were detected between groups (p = 0.07). The heart rate was significantly lower in group D than in M and C groups intraoperatively and during the first 1.5 h post extubation. The addition of dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to perineural ropivacaine did not improve the quality of perioperative analgesia and did not prolong the motor blockade in dogs undergoing sciatic and saphenous nerves block for TPLO surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受胫骨平台平整截骨术的犬中,将硬膜外右美托咪定或硫酸镁作为罗哌卡因的辅助剂的临床效果
该研究旨在比较右美托咪定(1 μg/kg/神经阻滞)或硫酸镁(2 mg/kg/神经阻滞)作为 0.3% 罗哌卡因的辅助剂对接受胫骨平台平整截骨术(TPLO)的犬进行坐骨神经和隐神经阻滞时的围手术期镇痛质量、运动阻滞持续时间以及对主要心血管参数的影响。狗随机接受了硬膜外右美托咪定-阿哌卡因(D组)、硫酸镁-阿哌卡因(M组)或罗哌卡因(C组)。如果术中出现痛觉反应,则使用芬太尼。术后疼痛采用短表-格拉斯哥综合疼痛量表(SF-GCMPS)和 VAS 量表进行评估。此外,还记录了运动阻滞的持续时间以及术中和术后的心血管参数。M 组所需芬太尼明显多于 D 组(P = 0.04)。与 C 组相比,M 组在拔管后 4 小时(p = 0.002)和 5 小时(p = 0.01)的 SF-GCMPS 评分明显高于 C 组,在拔管后 3 小时(p = 0.03)和 4 小时(p = 0.009)的 VAS 评分明显高于 D 组。各组在运动阻滞持续时间方面没有发现明显差异(p = 0.07)。术中和拔管后 1.5 小时内,D 组的心率明显低于 M 组和 C 组。对于接受坐骨神经和隐神经阻滞治疗以进行 TPLO 手术的犬,在硬膜外罗哌卡因中添加右美托咪定或硫酸镁作为辅助剂并不能改善围术期镇痛的质量,也不能延长运动阻滞的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development of point-of-care immunodiagnostic test for Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs. Effects of Bacillus coagulans on kidney injury caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in rabbits. Investigation of surfactant apoproteins and Brucella sp. antigens in the lungs of aborted bovine fetuses and neonatal calves delivered weak Incidence of puerperal metritis and associated risk factors in dairy cows in Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia Treatment modalities for claw horn lesions and their effects on locomotion scores, gait properties, lesion progression, and nociceptive threshold in dairy cows: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1