Identification and dynamic evolution of land use conflict potentials in China, 2000–2020

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112340
Shanshan Zong , Shan Xu , Xinyao Jiang , Ci Song
{"title":"Identification and dynamic evolution of land use conflict potentials in China, 2000–2020","authors":"Shanshan Zong ,&nbsp;Shan Xu ,&nbsp;Xinyao Jiang ,&nbsp;Ci Song","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under the background of rapid urbanization, a series of urgent problems have emerged in China, such as tightening resource constraints and intensifying land use conflicts (LUCs). Based on the perspective of agricultural production – residents’ life – ecological security, this study took China as the study area, applied the multi-criteria evaluation analysis method to diagnose the LUC type based on spatial statistics, coupling relationship matrix, comprehensive conflict index, and spatial autocorrelation model, then divided the LUC risk changes into seven patterns, and analyzed their spatial evolution characteristics. The results demonstrated that the scale of competition for scarce land between agriculture, construction, and ecology increased by 3.4 % over the last 20-year period. High conflict zone was mainly located in the eastern plains, which was also the main distribution zone of agriculture-construction conflict, while the agriculture-ecology conflict zone was mainly located in the west. Over time, LUC risk grade changed in 14.3 % of the study area, with the largest area of transitions from no conflict to moderate conflict (34.78 %). High intensification zone coincided almost entirely with ecologically fragile regions of the Midwest, underscoring the critical importance of LUC perspectives in ecological conservation. We provided a new perspective for the study of LUC changes and a scientific reference for realizing sustainable land use management in China and other regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 112340"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24007970/pdfft?md5=9ab9bf4cfaed6e3f5cad711b438f7dd1&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X24007970-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24007970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the background of rapid urbanization, a series of urgent problems have emerged in China, such as tightening resource constraints and intensifying land use conflicts (LUCs). Based on the perspective of agricultural production – residents’ life – ecological security, this study took China as the study area, applied the multi-criteria evaluation analysis method to diagnose the LUC type based on spatial statistics, coupling relationship matrix, comprehensive conflict index, and spatial autocorrelation model, then divided the LUC risk changes into seven patterns, and analyzed their spatial evolution characteristics. The results demonstrated that the scale of competition for scarce land between agriculture, construction, and ecology increased by 3.4 % over the last 20-year period. High conflict zone was mainly located in the eastern plains, which was also the main distribution zone of agriculture-construction conflict, while the agriculture-ecology conflict zone was mainly located in the west. Over time, LUC risk grade changed in 14.3 % of the study area, with the largest area of transitions from no conflict to moderate conflict (34.78 %). High intensification zone coincided almost entirely with ecologically fragile regions of the Midwest, underscoring the critical importance of LUC perspectives in ecological conservation. We provided a new perspective for the study of LUC changes and a scientific reference for realizing sustainable land use management in China and other regions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2000-2020 年中国土地利用冲突潜力的识别与动态演变
在快速城镇化背景下,中国出现了资源约束趋紧、土地利用矛盾加剧等一系列亟待解决的问题。基于农业生产-居民生活-生态安全的视角,本研究以中国为研究区域,运用多准则评价分析方法,基于空间统计、耦合关系矩阵、综合冲突指数和空间自相关模型对土地利用类型进行诊断,将土地利用类型风险变化划分为七种模式,并分析其空间演变特征。结果表明,在过去 20 年中,农业、建设和生态之间对稀缺土地的竞争规模增加了 3.4%。高冲突区主要分布在东部平原,也是农业与建设冲突的主要分布区,而农业与生态冲突区主要分布在西部。随着时间的推移,14.3%的研究区域的土地利用变化风险等级发生了变化,从无冲突到中度冲突的过渡区域面积最大(34.78%)。高强度区几乎完全与中西部生态脆弱的地区重合,突出了土地利用变化视角在生态保护中的至关重要性。我们为研究土地利用变化提供了一个新的视角,为中国和其他地区实现可持续土地利用管理提供了科学参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Urban forest indicator assessment for nature-based solutions to connect biodiversity and people Drivers of prehistoric cultural evolution in the Chengdu Plain: Fire events and environmental changes during the middle and late Holocene A novel integrated socio-ecological-economic index for assessing heat health risk Long-term water quality dynamics and trend assessment reveal the effectiveness of ecological compensation: Insights from China’s first cross-provincial compensation watershed Tracking ecosystem stability across boreal Siberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1