Compassionate deception: An ethnographic study of how and why health professionals and family members lie when caring for people with dementia in Danish nursing homes

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100457
Sofie Smedegaard Skov , Anja M.B. Jensen , Gitte Rasmussen , Anna Paldam Folker , Sigurd Lauridsen
{"title":"Compassionate deception: An ethnographic study of how and why health professionals and family members lie when caring for people with dementia in Danish nursing homes","authors":"Sofie Smedegaard Skov ,&nbsp;Anja M.B. Jensen ,&nbsp;Gitte Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Anna Paldam Folker ,&nbsp;Sigurd Lauridsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article uses the concept of compassionate deception to understand the complexity and duality at stake when health professionals and family members lie when caring for people with dementia. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork at two Danish nursing homes, we argue that compassionate deception conceptually illustrates the fine balance we observed of using lies and deception, while simultaneously acting with recognition and care towards residents. Ethical standards in dementia care do not recommend lying. Nonetheless, based on the practices and perspectives of health professionals and family members we direct ethnographic attention towards the intersections of caring and lying. Focusing on everyday social interactions and negotiations in the nursing home context, this study emphasizes the delicate balance between employing lies and deception, and fostering recognition in the context of dementia care. The study underlines the importance of taking the mundane care practices, the interpersonal relationships, as well as the work conditions and institutional pressure of health professionals into account when discussing care ethics in dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000660/pdfft?md5=dbb52a03b1a21633571f54558e4a1b19&pid=1-s2.0-S2667321524000660-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses the concept of compassionate deception to understand the complexity and duality at stake when health professionals and family members lie when caring for people with dementia. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork at two Danish nursing homes, we argue that compassionate deception conceptually illustrates the fine balance we observed of using lies and deception, while simultaneously acting with recognition and care towards residents. Ethical standards in dementia care do not recommend lying. Nonetheless, based on the practices and perspectives of health professionals and family members we direct ethnographic attention towards the intersections of caring and lying. Focusing on everyday social interactions and negotiations in the nursing home context, this study emphasizes the delicate balance between employing lies and deception, and fostering recognition in the context of dementia care. The study underlines the importance of taking the mundane care practices, the interpersonal relationships, as well as the work conditions and institutional pressure of health professionals into account when discussing care ethics in dementia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富有同情心的欺骗:对丹麦养老院中医护人员和家庭成员在照顾痴呆症患者时如何以及为何撒谎的人种学研究
本文使用 "同情性欺骗 "这一概念来理解医护人员和家庭成员在照顾痴呆症患者时撒谎的复杂性和双重性。通过在丹麦两家疗养院进行人种学实地调查,我们认为,同情性欺骗从概念上说明了我们所观察到的使用谎言和欺骗的微妙平衡,同时又对住院患者给予认可和关怀。痴呆症护理的道德标准不建议说谎。然而,基于医疗专业人员和家庭成员的实践和观点,我们将人种学的注意力引向了关爱与谎言的交叉点。本研究以养老院中的日常社会互动和协商为重点,强调了在痴呆症护理中使用谎言和欺骗与促进认可之间的微妙平衡。本研究强调,在讨论痴呆症护理伦理问题时,必须考虑到医护人员的日常护理实践、人际关系以及工作条件和机构压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of sources of knowledge in individuals with hoarding disorder: The impact of media depictions and social comparisons Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank Factors affecting the implementation and sustainability of an Australian community-based doula service: A qualitative study “I am forced to just give it to her because she is the one who wants it”: A qualitative study of providers’ perspectives on contraceptive counseling in Tanzania Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1