Do irrigated and rainfed agrosystems change aboveground and root carbon and nitrogen stocks in a semiarid environment?

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Arid Environments Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105223
Mônica Silva Santana , Vanderlise Giongo , Everardo Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio , Eunice Maia de Andrade
{"title":"Do irrigated and rainfed agrosystems change aboveground and root carbon and nitrogen stocks in a semiarid environment?","authors":"Mônica Silva Santana ,&nbsp;Vanderlise Giongo ,&nbsp;Everardo Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio ,&nbsp;Eunice Maia de Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining shoot and root biomass and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks in different ecosystems is crucial to propose adaptative measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Data on systems of semiarid areas are scarce, especially irrigated ones. We compared biomasses of four irrigated (bean, maize, grapevine, and mango) and four rainfed livestock systems (buffel grass, prickly pear, gliricidia and leucaena) with those of a preserved and an open tropical dry forest (Caatinga) used as pasture. Caatinga biomass was estimated by allometry and biomasses of the other systems by the destructive method. Root biomasses were determined in layers down to 100 cm. Mango had the highest aboveground and root biomasses: 34.2 and 91.3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Preserved Caatinga was the second in aboveground biomass: 25.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>, compared 9–14.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> of the open Caatinga and permanent crops and 3.0–11.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> of the grass and annual crops. Preserved Caatinga, gliricidia and buffel grass formed the second group in root biomass (23.7–25.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>), while all other systems had less than 13.5 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Preserved and open Caatinga, annual crops and prickly pear had root:shoot ratios below 1, while the other systems had ratios &gt;1, especially mango (2.7). Most systems had roots concentrated in the 0–15 cm layer, but the permanent crops, except prickly pear, concentrated about half of their roots in deeper layers. C (34.2–46.6%) and N (0.6–3.4%) concentrations varied less than biomasses. Root biomass was the plant factor mostly correlated with soil C and N stocks. Therefore, irrigated crops can accumulate more biomass than the native forest, but substitution by mango led to a severe depletion in soil C and N stocks, and all other systems also lost soil C and N. Management strategies such as green manure and crop diversification should be adopted to maintain plant and soil C and N stocks similar to those of the original vegetation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arid Environments","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 105223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arid Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196324001034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining shoot and root biomass and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks in different ecosystems is crucial to propose adaptative measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission. Data on systems of semiarid areas are scarce, especially irrigated ones. We compared biomasses of four irrigated (bean, maize, grapevine, and mango) and four rainfed livestock systems (buffel grass, prickly pear, gliricidia and leucaena) with those of a preserved and an open tropical dry forest (Caatinga) used as pasture. Caatinga biomass was estimated by allometry and biomasses of the other systems by the destructive method. Root biomasses were determined in layers down to 100 cm. Mango had the highest aboveground and root biomasses: 34.2 and 91.3 Mg ha−1. Preserved Caatinga was the second in aboveground biomass: 25.1 Mg ha−1, compared 9–14.1 Mg ha−1 of the open Caatinga and permanent crops and 3.0–11.8 Mg ha−1 of the grass and annual crops. Preserved Caatinga, gliricidia and buffel grass formed the second group in root biomass (23.7–25.1 Mg ha−1), while all other systems had less than 13.5 Mg ha−1. Preserved and open Caatinga, annual crops and prickly pear had root:shoot ratios below 1, while the other systems had ratios >1, especially mango (2.7). Most systems had roots concentrated in the 0–15 cm layer, but the permanent crops, except prickly pear, concentrated about half of their roots in deeper layers. C (34.2–46.6%) and N (0.6–3.4%) concentrations varied less than biomasses. Root biomass was the plant factor mostly correlated with soil C and N stocks. Therefore, irrigated crops can accumulate more biomass than the native forest, but substitution by mango led to a severe depletion in soil C and N stocks, and all other systems also lost soil C and N. Management strategies such as green manure and crop diversification should be adopted to maintain plant and soil C and N stocks similar to those of the original vegetation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在半干旱环境中,灌溉和雨水灌溉农业系统是否会改变地上和根部的碳储量和氮储量?
确定不同生态系统的根茎生物量、碳(C)和氮(N)储量对于提出减少温室气体排放的适应性措施至关重要。有关半干旱地区生态系统的数据很少,尤其是灌溉系统。我们比较了四种灌溉系统(豆类、玉米、葡萄树和芒果)和四种雨水灌溉牲畜系统(水牛草、刺梨、鹅掌楸和鹅掌楸)的生物量,以及作为牧场的保护林和开放式热带干旱林(Caatinga)的生物量。Caatinga 的生物量是通过比重测定法估算的,而其他系统的生物量则是通过破坏法估算的。根的生物量是在 100 厘米以下的层中测定的。芒果的地上生物量和根系生物量最高:34.2 兆克/公顷和 91.3 兆克/公顷。受保护的 Caatinga 的地上生物量位居第二:25.1 毫克/公顷-1,而开放的 Caatinga 和永久性作物的地上生物量为 9-14.1 毫克/公顷-1,草地和一年生作物的地上生物量为 3.0-11.8 毫克/公顷-1。在根系生物量方面,受保护的卡廷加、鹅掌楸和水牛草排在第二位(23.7-25.1 兆克/公顷-1),而所有其他系统的根系生物量都低于 13.5 兆克/公顷-1。保留和开放的卡廷加、一年生作物和刺梨的根茎比低于 1,而其他系统的根茎比为 1,尤其是芒果(2.7)。大多数系统的根系集中在 0-15 厘米层,但除刺梨外,永久性作物的根系约有一半集中在较深层。碳(34.2-46.6%)和氮(0.6-3.4%)浓度的变化小于生物量的变化。根系生物量是与土壤碳储量和氮储量最相关的植物因子。因此,灌溉作物可以积累比原始森林更多的生物量,但芒果的替代会导致土壤碳储量和氮储量的严重消耗,所有其他系统也会损失土壤碳储量和氮储量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arid Environments
Journal of Arid Environments 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arid Environments is an international journal publishing original scientific and technical research articles on physical, biological and cultural aspects of arid, semi-arid, and desert environments. As a forum of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue it addresses research on all aspects of arid environments and their past, present and future use.
期刊最新文献
Projectiles from Yemen? A unique discovery of geometric microliths in a mortuary site of the mid-first millennium BCE in the Negev Highlands, Israel Navigating climate shifts for an endemic lizard from a semi-arid environment Valuing drought impact mitigation on ecosystem services in a Mediterranean country Resource allocation below- and above-ground organs and their association to the environment in Mammillaria Haw. (Cactaceae) Think outside the road: Negev connectivity beyond the ‘Nabatean incense route’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1