Surgical care bundles for surgical site infection prevention in high-income and low-to-middle-income countries: A comparative review

Sara C. Chaker , Andrew J. James , Galen Perdikis , Peter Nthumba
{"title":"Surgical care bundles for surgical site infection prevention in high-income and low-to-middle-income countries: A comparative review","authors":"Sara C. Chaker ,&nbsp;Andrew J. James ,&nbsp;Galen Perdikis ,&nbsp;Peter Nthumba","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Surgical site infections (SSIs) are infections of the incision site or organ space following a surgical procedure. The ramifications of an SSI extend beyond individual patient morbidity; SSIs lead to a substantial strain on healthcare systems, irrespective of the economic standing of the country. The utilization of a “care bundle” is a recommended approach for reducing the incidence of SSIs. These bundles typically involve the integration of evidence-based interventions, spanning preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care, which aim to standardize healthcare delivery and infection prevention practices. While there is evidence supporting the efficacy of various care bundles, comparisons between specific bundles implemented in high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) remain largely unreported. Understanding variations in implemented care bundles in these settings is central to optimize approaches for SSI risk reduction on a global scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are infections of the incision site or organ space following a surgical procedure. The ramifications of an SSI extend beyond individual patient morbidity; SSIs lead to a substantial strain on healthcare systems, irrespective of the economic standing of the country. The utilization of a “care bundle” is a recommended approach for reducing the incidence of SSIs. These bundles typically involve the integration of evidence-based interventions, spanning preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care, which aim to standardize healthcare delivery and infection prevention practices. While there is evidence supporting the efficacy of various care bundles, comparisons between specific bundles implemented in high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs) remain largely unreported. Understanding variations in implemented care bundles in these settings is central to optimize approaches for SSI risk reduction on a global scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高收入国家和中低收入国家预防手术部位感染的手术护理捆绑方案:比较综述
手术部位感染(SSI)是指外科手术后切口部位或器官间隙的感染。SSI 的影响不仅限于个别病人的发病率,无论国家的经济状况如何,SSI 都会给医疗系统带来巨大的压力。采用 "护理捆绑 "是降低 SSI 发生率的一种推荐方法。这些护理包通常涉及以证据为基础的干预措施的整合,横跨术前、术中和术后护理阶段,旨在实现医疗服务和感染预防实践的标准化。虽然有证据支持各种护理捆绑包的有效性,但对高收入国家(HICs)和中低收入国家(LMICs)实施的特定捆绑包之间的比较在很大程度上仍未见报道。要在全球范围内优化降低 SSI 风险的方法,了解在这些环境中实施的护理捆绑方案的差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
期刊最新文献
A study of the relationship between professional autonomy and professional quality of life among operating room personnel: A cross-sectional study Postoperative mechanical ventilation after corrective Tetralogy of Fallot surgery in infants: Assessment of perioperative factors and radiographic severity scores Compliance evaluation in post-anesthesia care units at teaching hospitals in Alborz Province, Iran Anaesthetic management of caesarean section in a primigravida with pre-eclampsia, pleural effusion, consolidation, and lung collapse – a case report The effect of surgical smoke on operating room workers, attitudes towards risks, and the implementation of preventive measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1